การบริหารจัดการกองทุนเงินให้กู้ยืมเพื่อการศึกษาในบริบทใหม่: สภาพปัจจุบันและความคาดหวังของมหาวิทยาลัยในจังหวัดสงขลา
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55164/ecbajournal.v18i2.283462คำสำคัญ:
การบริหารจัดการ, กองทุน กยศ., พ.ร.บ. กองทุนฯ (ฉบับ 2) พ.ศ. 2566, จังหวัดสงขลาบทคัดย่อ
กองทุนเงินให้กู้ยืมเพื่อการศึกษา (กยศ.) มีบทบาทสำคัญในการลดความเหลื่อมล้ำทางการศึกษา แต่การเปลี่ยนแปลงตามพระราชบัญญัติกองทุนฯ (ฉบับที่ 2) พ.ศ. 2566 ยังขาดงานวิจัยที่อธิบายการปรับตัวของระบบบริหารจัดการในสถาบันอุดมศึกษา โดยเฉพาะในบริบทพื้นที่ที่มีความแตกต่างด้านเศรษฐกิจและสังคม ข้อมูลดังกล่าวมีความจำเป็นต่อการออกแบบนโยบายให้สอดคล้องกับกฎหมายใหม่และความต้องการของผู้เกี่ยวข้อง การวิจัยนี้จึงมีวัตถุประสงค์เพื่อศึกษาสภาพปัจจุบันและความคาดหวังในการบริหารจัดการกองทุน กยศ. ของมหาวิทยาลัยในจังหวัดสงขลา กลุ่มตัวอย่างคือนักศึกษาผู้กู้ยืม 400 คนและผู้ปฏิบัติงานกองทุนฯ 10 คน จาก 5 มหาวิทยาลัย เครื่องมือวิจัยคือแบบสอบถามที่ผ่านการตรวจสอบคุณภาพด้วยค่า IOC และ Cronbach’s Alpha วิเคราะห์ข้อมูลด้วยสถิติพรรณนา ค่าเฉลี่ยและส่วนเบี่ยงเบนมาตรฐาน ผลการวิจัยพบว่า นักศึกษามีความคิดเห็นต่อสภาพปัจจุบันของการดำเนินงานในระดับมาก (เอกสารอ้างอิง
Armstrong, S., Dearden, L., Kobayashi, M., & Nagase, N. (2019). Student loans in Japan: Current problems and possible solutions. Economics of Education Review, 71, 120–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.10.012
Barr, N. (2019). The Economics of the Welfare State (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
Berlinger, E. (2009). An efficient student loan system: Case study of Hungary. Higher Education in Europe, 34(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720902867542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720902867542
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Bubphamala, M. (2017). Satisfaction of students of the College of Political Science and Public Administration, Mahasarakham University towards the student loan fund. Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, 7(2), 321–334.
Buraheang, A., Padohing, S., Laka, A., & Lateh, A. (2019). Analysis of factors and classification of delinquent borrowers of the student loan fund. Proceedings of the 3rd National Undergraduate Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences. Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341294918.
Chakkaew, W., Kangwon, S., & Sinnarong, N. (2018). A study on increasing opportunities and access to higher education for disadvantaged children in upper northern Thailand. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University (Humanities, Social Sciences and Arts), 11(3), 1767–1784.
Chansamut, T., & Lakkhanaphichanchat, N. (2023). Digital service systems for improving the efficiency of the student loan fund operations. Journal of Educational Administration and Management, 15(2), 45–60.
Chapman, B., & Ryan, C. (2005). The access implications of income-contingent charges for higher education: Lessons from Australia. Economics of Education Review, 24(5), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.08.009
Chapman, B., & Sinning, M. (2014). Student loan reforms for German higher education: Financing tuition fees. Education Economics, 22(6), 569–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2012.729327
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Faiyuea, R., Sirinakorn, C., Santiphanathon Prongjit, P. K., & Dokchan, P. (2021). Guidelines for resolving debt problems of the Student Loan Fund (SLF). Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 6(1), 199–213.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (Eds.). (1937). Papers on the Science of Administration. Institute of Public Administration.
Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment: An international text. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220191
Higgins, T., Britton, J., & van der Erve, L. (2019). Income-contingent student loan design: Lessons from around the world. Economics of Education Review, 71, 65–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.06.001
Homsuwan, S. (2015). Developing mechanisms for allocating scholarships and student loans responsive to students’ needs. Journal of Public Administration Academic, 13(1), 121–135.
Hongphothiphan, W. (2019). Factors affecting the success of restructuring non-performing loans of a commercial bank ([Master’s thesis]. Thammasat University.
Jittinan, S. (2020). Reducing educational inequality through the student loan program in Thailand. Thai Journal of Education, 17(1), 45–60.
Ketumongkonphong, P., Boonyapho, K., Siriphuriphalangkorn, K., & Sa-udom, P. (2020). Factors affecting digital technology acceptance and decision-making in the work of personnel in private companies in Bangkok. Journal of Local Administration and Innovation, 4(3), 141–156.
Kim, A., & Lee, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology on loan management systems: Reducing costs, enhancing efficiency, and promoting transparency. Journal of Financial Technology, 15(2), 101–115.
Kongsomboon, P. (2022). Challenges in developing information systems to comply with changing policies and laws. https://yri.mbu.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/วิจัยฉบับสมบูรณ์-จิตร.pdf
Koomson, I., Koomson, P., & Abdul-Mumuni, A. (2023). Trust in banks, financial inclusion and the mediating role of borrower discouragement. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 88, 1418–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.090
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Lambert, R., & Pennell, H. (2008). Equity in higher education: The impact of transparent selection criteria on reducing bias and enhancing access to scholarships. Journal of Educational Finance, 34(2), 123–145.
Lertsirimongkolchai, S. (2020). Factors affecting the efficiency of public sector services in the 4.0 era: A case study of the Bangkok Land Office [Master’s thesis]. Thammasat University.
Lochner, L., & Monge-Naranjo, A. (2016). Student loans and repayment: Theory, evidence and policy. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 5, 397–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63459-7.00008-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63459-7.00008-7
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.
Lueangwongngam, S., Prawatrungreung, P., & Phangnirun, B. (2015). Strategic management of the monitoring system of the student loan fund. Journal of Education, 26(3), 217–228.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Phromsaka Na Sakonnakhon, A. (2018). A study of budget planning variables influencing the effectiveness of the procurement management system of Mahidol University personnel. Mahidol R2R e-Journal, 5(1), 33–42.
Phannarai, T. (2022). Factors affecting the performance efficiency of personnel in Songkhla Provincial Administrative Organization (Independent study, Master of Public Administration). Prince of Songkla University.
Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2004). Returns to investment in education: A further update. Education Economics, 12(2), 111–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0964529042000239140
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
Schultz, T. W. (1971). Investment in human capital: The role of education and of research. Free Press.
Singh, R., Johnson, K., & Patel, A. (2021). Financial responsibility and behavioral eligibility in student loan systems: International evidence and lessons. Journal of Educational Finance and Policy, 16(3), 289–310.
Skyttner, L. (2005). General systems theory: Problems, perspectives, practice. World Scientific. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/5871
Somkheaw, P. (2021). Human resource development in the digital age civil service system of Kokko Subdistrict Municipality, Mueang Lopburi District, Lopburi Province [Independent study]. Thepsatri Rajabhat University.
Student Loan Fund. (2022). Status of the Student Loan Fund. https://www.studentloan.or.th/th/aboutus/1561454106
Student Loan Fund. (2023). Student Loan Fund collaborates with the Office of the Private Education Commission to pilot short-term Reskill/Upskill loan programs. https://www.studentloan.or.th/th/news/1701340995
Tatiyalapha, D., Srichaliang, E., & Tosanguan, C. (2022). Survey of user satisfaction with the operations of the student loan fund. Journal of Social Science Research, 17(2), 88–102.
ThaiPublica. (2018). Lessons learned from the student loan fund in terms of legal fairness and the proposal to abolish the guarantor system. https://thaipublica.org/2018/08/student-loan-guarantee-justice/
Thanaphonrit, T., & Burakhom, P. (2021). Student satisfaction and benefit distribution of the student loan fund: A case study of higher education institutions. Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University Journal of Research and Development, 13(1), 45–59.
Tilak, J. B. G. (2002). Education and poverty. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 3(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880220147301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880220147301
Tumthong, D., & Sirisunthorn, P. (2020). Educational equity: A case study of the Student Loan Fund (SLF) in vocational education in Northeastern Thailand. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 190–202.
Udon Thani Rajabhat University. (2023). Final report of the lifelong learning and future skills development (Upskill/Reskill) project, 2023. https://technology.udru.ac.th/Upskill_Reskill/file/01.Lifelong_learning_and_developing_skills_for_the_future_2566.pdf
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wongprasert, C. (2021). Development of a secure information system for public sector organizations [Independent study]. Thammasat University.
Yamane, T. (1970). Statistics: An introductory analysis. (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2026 Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Thaksin University
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
