Research and Model Development of a Healthy Balance to Reduce Risk Factors in Ergonomic for the Employees in the Kabinburi Industrial Zone
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of the research 1) to study the basic opinion information and needs for health’s balance to reduce the risk factors of ergonomics of the employees in Kabinburi Industrial zone 2) to study a model development and the health’s balance manual to reduce the risk factors of ergonomics of the employees in Kabinburi Industrial zone 3) to propose a pilot approach to make the health’s balance model to the reduce the risk factors of ergonomics. 4) To assess a satisfaction and improve the health’s balance model to the reduce the risk factors of ergonomics. The research had conducted in 4 steps by using the mixed method. The qualitative method use synthesis of in-depth interview. The quantitative method was a tool for confirmation and test. The result of research at 1st step from sample group of respondents 392 persons found that they had their opinions in a moderate level for the risk factors of ergonomic. They need to make the healthy balance in high level. This result comply with 8 experts. They gave an instruction to develop knowledge of human resource and standard of the ergonomics knowledge. Then 2nd step was the synthesis in the basic information of an academic paper, a research and in-depth interview .They can be 6 model/ configurations. It was called “KABINS Model” is the development of knowledge, risk assessment activity, behavior changing, Conditional adjustment, norm of natural balance creation and self - care holistic. The experts have agreed this with high level to confirm the configuration. 3rd step was the experimental prototypes .They were tested in the experiment study area with 60 samples. The results of the pre-tests by a questionnaire were low level. After the sample group joined the training the scores of post-tests were at a high level. 4th step was the evaluation of satisfaction. Overview was high level. The result from the focus group that will be a topic to improve and development. From the trainees and the experts they suggested that the creation of healthy balance for holistic health will reduce the risk factors of ergonomics and it can promote development into the human resource for health.
Article Details
Article Screening Policy
- All research and academic articles to be published must be considered and screened by three peer reviews in the relevant field / article.
- All articles, texts, illustrations and tables published in the journal are the personal opinions of the authors. Editors don't always have to agree. And no responsibility whatsoever is the sole responsibility of the author.
- The articles to be published must never be published. Where did you first publish? And not in the consideration of other journals If the audit found that there has been a duplicate publication It is the sole responsibility of the author.
- Any article that the reader sees as being plagiarized or impersonated without reference. Or mislead the work of the author Please let the journal editor know it will be your greatest blessing.
References
2. Nikom Tanomseng.(2007) Quality Questionnaire Survey." Department of Statistics and Demography Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University
3. Suthida kungkaiwong.(2013) Ergonomics in the workplace. Bangkok: Institute for Safety in Work. Department of Labour Protection and Welfare.
4. Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health. Office of Policy and Strategy. (2016) Strategic Plan Bureau of Policy and Strategy, Fiscal Year 2016
5. Anne Chiraphong Suwan (2013). "Health Threats, Work Environment, and Enterprise Surveys." Journal of Public Health 27, 3 (September): 106-114.
6. Anderson, C.A. et al. (2000). Temperature and aggression. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advance in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
7. Combach, L. J. (2003). Essential of Psychology Testing. New York: Hanpercollishes.
8. De Loose and Cambier. (2007). “Individual and work related risk factor for neck pain among office Workers: a cross sectional study.” Published online.
9. Harter, James K. et al. (2003). “Well-Being in the workplace and its Relationship to Business Outcomes: A review of the Gallup Studies.” In Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the life well-lived. 205-244. Edited by Corey L.M. Keyes and Jonathan Haidt, eds. Washing, DC: American Psychological Association.
10. Health and Safety Executive. (2003). “Health and safety statistics highlights, Health and safety Executive, HSE, ST Tistic.” Hemphill and Westie (1900): 325-342.
11. Hignett, S. and L. Mc Atamney. (2000). “Rapid entire body assessment, REBA.”
The journal Applied ergonomics 31: 201-205.
12. HSE statistics. (2004). “Offshore Injury, ILL Health and Incident Statistics 2004/2005 HID Statistics Report HSR 2005 001.” Health and Safety Executive, HSE
13. National cancer institute. (2003). U.S National institute of health theory at a glance: A guild for Health promotion U.S. National institute of health. NCI: National cancer institute.
14. Punnett and Wegman. (2004). “Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic Evidence and the debate” PMID 14759746, PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE.
15. Robbins, S. P. and T. A. Judge. (2009). Organization. New Jersey: Prentice hall.
16. Robert, L., Mathis John and H. Jackson. (2007). Human resource management. 12th ed. USA: Thomson south - western.