The Factors on the Successful Development of Eco-industrial Town: A Case Study of Bangpoo Industrial Estate

Main Article Content

Kittikun Sangnin
Prasopchai Pasunon
Thirawat Chantuk


This research aims to study the exploratory factor analysis of successful factors affecting success in the development of Eco-Industrial Town: A Case Study of Bangpoo Industrial Estate, by collecting data from the sample area of ​​Bangpoo Industrial Estate, surrounding area and related agencies including Bangpoo Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand, entrepreneurs within Bangpoo Industrial Estate, and surrounding community. The total of 574 samples used cluster sampling, principal component analysis and variable perimetric rotation by Varimax. Research has shown that the set of variables studied can be analyzed for 12 components. This can explain the cumulative variance of 58.760. The results show the key factors that influence the success of the development of eco-industrial town. If the key stakeholders are involved, these factors can be applied to the development strategies or strategies for managing the above development projects. It will be very useful. This will also benefit the successful project.


Article Details

How to Cite
Sangnin, K. ., Pasunon, P. ., & Chantuk, T. . (2020). The Factors on the Successful Development of Eco-industrial Town: A Case Study of Bangpoo Industrial Estate. Dusit Thani College Journal, 12(3), 463–481. Retrieved from
Research Article


1. Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand. 2012. The characteristics of criteria and criteria of being "Eco-Industrial City" was launched on November 28, 2015 from
2. The Federation of Thai Industries. 2012. The scope and definition of "eco-industrial cities". Founded on March 10, 2016, from
3. Boonchom Srisa-ard. (2011). Introduction to Research. Printed in the 9th Amendment. Bangkok: Suweeya Sarn.
4. Prasopchai, S. (2010). The teaching documents of Market research 1. Nakhon Pathom: Petchakasem Printing.
5. Chertow, Marian. 2000. “Industrial Symbiosis: A Review.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment Vol. 25.
6. Côté, R.P. & Cohen-Rosenthal, E. 1998. Designing eco-industrial parks: a synthesis of some experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production 6 (3–4), 181–188.
7. Eilering, J. & Vermeulen, W. 2004. Eco-industrial parks: toward industrial symbiosis and utility sharing in practice. Progress in Industrial Ecology 1 (1–3), 245–270.
8. Ehrenfeld, J. & Gertler, N. 1997. The evolution of inter-dependency at Kalundborg. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1 (1), 67–80.
9. Fichtner, W., Tietze-Stöckinger, I., Frank, M. & Rentz, O. 2005. Barriers of inter-organisational environmental management: two case studies on industrial symbiosis. Progress in Industrial Ecology – an International Journal 2 (1), 73–88.
10. Gibbs, D. & Deutz, P. 2004. Implementing industrial ecology? Planning for eco-industrial parks in the USA. Geoforum 36 (4), 452–464.
11. Heeres, R. R. 2004. Eco-Industrial Park Initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: First Lessons. Journal of Cleaner Production. 12: 985–995.
12. Pimpa, N. (2003) Development of an Instrument for Measuring Familial Influence on Thai Student’s Choices of International Education. International Education Journal, 4(1), 24-29.
13. Starlander, J.-E. 2003. Industrial Symbiosis: A Closer Look on Organisational Factors. A study based on the Industrial Symbiosis project in Landskrona, Sweden. IIIEE Reports 2003:4. Masters Thesis. The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics. Environmental Management and Policy. Lund, Sweden.
14. Wiersma, W. (1991). Research Methods in Education, (5th edition). Sydney: Allyn and Bacon.
15. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis. New York: Harper and Row.