Digital Culture and Social Networks of Plant-Based Meat Consumers on Social Media Ethnological Studies in Digital Communities
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is a qualitative research based on digital ethnology with the aim of studying the culture and social networks of consumers of meat substitutes on social media. The results showed that the digital culture of consumers of meat substitutes on social media has two issues: 1) Health. Consumers have a positive attitude towards plant-based meat substitutes because plant-based foods are of good quality, high nutritional value. Equivalent The consumption of plant-based meat products can reduce the destruction of the natural environment because animal husbandry causes carbon dioxide from the meat farming process and produces greenhouse gases that cause global warming. However, the consumption of plant-based meat does not cause environmental damage. In addition, a study of social networks of meat substitutes consumers on social media also found that consumers have created networks to communicate with groups who prefer to consume plant-based meat on knowledge sharing, health, and most of them focus on Interested in the same subject, network groups also follow the fan pages of groups that are socially connected or in their interests to exchange news on the consumption of plant-based meat.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Article Screening Policy
- All research and academic articles to be published must be considered and screened by three peer reviews in the relevant field / article.
- All articles, texts, illustrations and tables published in the journal are the personal opinions of the authors. Editors don't always have to agree. And no responsibility whatsoever is the sole responsibility of the author.
- The articles to be published must never be published. Where did you first publish? And not in the consideration of other journals If the audit found that there has been a duplicate publication It is the sole responsibility of the author.
- Any article that the reader sees as being plagiarized or impersonated without reference. Or mislead the work of the author Please let the journal editor know it will be your greatest blessing.
References
Attapol, p. (2016). A Critical Reflection of Digital Culture from Philosophy of Education of Paulo Freire’s. Panithan Journal, 12(1), 78-97
Benjarong, T. (2020). Netnography: Research Methodology in virtual space, Journal of Social Communication Innovation, 8(1), 76-88.
Chanajai, T. and Wongladda, W. (2022). Development Guidelines for Recreational Vehicles (RV) Tourism in Thailand. Siam Academic Review, 23(2), 1-19.
Cohen, L., and Manion, L. (1994). Research Methodsin Education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Jakrapan, K. (2021). Digital Ethnography: Challenges and Practices in Human Research Ethics. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Khon Kaen University.
Khemisara, C., and Nipat, L. 2022. Protein products from plants. Trends in modern consumption. Food Academic Article, 52(2), 5-15.
Kozinets, R.V. 2002. The field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1),61-72.
Krungthai. (2019). Plant base food. Retrieved 30 August 2022 from https://krungthai.com/Download/economyresources/
EconomyResourcesDownload _625Slide_Plant_Base_Food_24_11_63_1.pdf
Lang, M. (2020). Consumer acceptance of blending plant-based ingredients into traditional meat based foods: Evidence from the meat-mushroom blend. Food Quality and Preference,79, 103758. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103758
Namthip, W. (2015). Social Network in a Networked Society. TLA Research J, 8(2), 119-127.
Natalie R. Rubio, Ning, X., and David L. (2020). Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production. Nature Communications volume. p.1-11.
Nawaporn, N. (2020). Knowledge, Attitudes and Plant Meat Consumption Behavior of the Population in Bangkok (Master of Management Thesis). Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University.
Mananya, K. (2021). Approaches to Development of the Plants-Based Meat in Thailand. Journal of Research and Innovation in Science and Technology, 2(3), 1-13.
Peerakan, K. (2016). Netnography: Research Methodology to Find Community Truth and Online Culture of the postmodern era. Faculty of Communication Sciences, Prince of Songkla University.
Ploypailin, P., Saranthorn, S., and Warapan, A. (2022). The influence of online media and marketing mix factors to purchase intention of plant based meat consumers in bangkok. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 9(5), 147-160.
Sureerak, W. (2018). Social Networks: the online marketing communication strategies for attracting customers in the digital age. MUT Journal of Business Administration, 15(1), 22-36.
Thannaphat, S. (2022). Factors affecting purchase intention of plant-based meat substitutes for the health of health-conscious consumers in the Bangkok (Master of Management Thesis). Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University.
Uobam, D. (2002). Plant based meat. Retrieved 21 October 2022. from https://www.uobam.co.th/srcm/publication/mlqur5zik/r5/zi/o0x0/
UOBAM-ESG-Plant-based-meat-TH-Final.pdf. 21 กันยายน 2565.
Unileverfoodsolutions. (2022). Plant-based meat menu What is plant-based food. Retrieved 21 October 2022. from https://www.unileverfoodsolutions.co.th/th/chef-inspiration/plant-based/plant-based-meat.html