Su Ji Pu Li: Development of English Competency for Student Teachers of Faculty of Education, Mahamakut Buddhist University
Keywords:
English competency development, Student teachers, Su Ji Pu LiAbstract
The objectives of this research were to: 1) develop the English language competency of teaching practicum students using the Su Ji Pu Li principles with a target efficiency criterion of 75/75 2) investigate and compare the academic achievement in English competency of teaching practicum students before and after the application of the Su Ji Pu Li principles 3) study the satisfaction level regarding the development of English competency of teaching practicum students utilizing the Su Ji Pu Li principles. The research employed a quasi-experimental methodology. The participants consisted of 69 undergraduate students during the 2023 academic year. Research instruments included English competency development exercise sets, academic achievement tests, and satisfaction questionnaires. Data analysis utilized multiple statistical techniques: mean and percentage calculations, t-test, satisfaction analysis using mean and standard deviation, content validity assessment yielding an IOC, reliability testing resulting in a coefficient, and item analysis through difficulty Index and discrimination Index.
The results of this research found that:
- The English competency exercise sets based on the Su Ji Pu Li principles achieved an overall efficiency of 76.7/79.30, exceeding the established criterion of 75/75.
- Post-test mean scores (ðĨĖ = 76.88, S.D. = 11.98) were significantly higher than pre-test mean scores (ðĨĖ = 67.32, S.D. = 10.96), with a t-test value of 13.707, indicating statistical significance at the .05 level.
- Students expressed a high level of satisfaction regarding the English competency development process, with a mean satisfaction rating of 3.94 (ðĨĖ = 3.94, S.D. = 0.58).
References
āļāļĢāļĄāļŠāļĄāđāļāđāļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļāļĢāļąāļāļāļĢāļēāļāļŠāļļāļāļēāļŊ āļŠāļĒāļēāļĄāļāļĢāļĄāļĢāļēāļāļāļļāļĄāļēāļĢāļĩ. (2558). āļĢāļēāļāļāļģāļĢāļąāļŠāđāļĢāļ·āđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļĻāđāļāļĒ. āļŠāļģāļāļąāļāļāļĢāļ°āļĢāļēāļāļ§āļąāļ.
āļāļĒāļēāļāļĨ āļāļĄāļāļąāļĒāļĒāļē, āļĻāļīāļĢāļīāļāļĒāļē āļāļīāļāļąāļāļāđāļĻāļĢāļĩāļŠāļ§āļąāļŠāļāļīāđ, āđāļĨāļ°āļāļąāļāļāļĢ āđāļāļ§āļēāļāļāļļāļāļąāļāļāđ. (2565). āļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāļāļēāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ·āđāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļąāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļĒāđāļāđāļāļēāļĢāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĢāļđāđāļāđāļ§āļĒāļāļāđāļāļ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāļāļēāļ āļīāļ§āļąāļāļāđ, 14 (1), 347-361. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pimjournal/article/view/253455
āļāļąāļāļāļē āļāđāļāļāļŠāļąāļĄāļāļąāļāļāļļāđ. (2563). āļāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĢāļđāđāđāļāļāļāļąāļāļŦāļēāđāļāđāļāļāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļĄāļĩāļāđāļāļāļąāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļđāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļąāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ·āđāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļāļąāļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĢāļ°āļāļąāļāļāļĢāļīāļāļāļēāļāļąāļāļāļīāļ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĻāļīāļĨāļāļēāļāļĢ, 11 (1), 34â50. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EdAd/article/view/241645
āļāļĪāļāļāļāđāļāļīāļĢāļāļļāļĨ āļŠāļļāļāļāļāļķāļ āđāļĨāļ°āđāļāļāļđāļĢāļĒāđ āļŠāļīāļāļĨāļēāļĢāļąāļāļāđ. (2561). āļĢāļđāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļąāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļĒāđāļāđāļāļēāļĢāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĢāļđāđāļāļēāļāļŠāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāđāļŠāļĄāļ·āļāļāļāļĢāļīāļāđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļŠāļĢāđāļēāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļēāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļąāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļāļĢāļđāđāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļāļāļāđāļāļāļāļāļāļāļąāļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĢāļ°āļāļąāļāļāļĢāļīāļāļāļēāļāļĢāļĩ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļļāļāļāļīāļāļĢāļīāļāļąāļĻāļāđ, 32(āļāļāļąāļāļāļīāđāļĻāļĐ), 195-206. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DPUSuthiparithatJournal/article/view/243304
āļāļąāļāļĄāļē āļĒāļīāđāļĄāļŠāļāļļāļĨ. (2564). āļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāļāļēāļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĢāļđāđāđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļŠāļĢāđāļēāļāļāļąāļāļĐāļ°āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļąāļāļāļĪāļĐāļāļāļāļāļąāļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāļĢāļđ āļāļāļ°āļāļĢāļļāļĻāļēāļŠāļāļĢāđ āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļāļ āļąāļāļāļāļāļļāļĢāļĩ āđāļāļĒāļāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļ§āļīāļāļĩ Micro Teaching āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĢāļđāđāđāļāļ Active Learning. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļāļ āļąāļāļāļāļāļļāļĢāļĩ, 15(2), 11â21. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journaldru/article/view/253782
āļāļĢāļāļīāļĢāļē āđāļŠāļ·āļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļīāļĐāļ. (2561). āļāļēāļĢāđāļāđ āļŠāļļ āļāļī āļāļļ āļĨāļī āđāļāļ·āđāļāļŠāđāļāđāļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļāļīāļāļ§āļīāđāļāļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđāļ§āļīāļāļēāļ āļēāļĐāļēāđāļāļĒāđāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļ°āļāļĩāđ 5 āļ§āļĢāļĢāļāļāļāļĩāđāļĨāļ°āļ§āļĢāļĢāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĄ āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļāļąāļāđāļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļāļąāđāļāļĄāļąāļāļĒāļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāļĩāļāļĩāđ 5 [āļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļāļīāļāļāļāđāļāļĢāļīāļāļāļēāļĄāļŦāļēāļāļąāļāļāļīāļ āđāļĄāđāđāļāđāļāļĩāļāļīāļĄāļāđ]. āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļāļļāļĢāļāļīāļāļāļąāļāļāļīāļāļĒāđ.
āļāļēāļāļąāļ āļāļāļēāļāļđāļĢāđāļĄāļāļē. (2560). āļāļąāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļąāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļĻāļāļ§āļĢāļĢāļĐāļāļĩāđ 21 āđāļāļĒāđāļāđāļŦāļĨāļąāļ āļŠāļļ.āļāļī.āļāļļ.āļĨāļī. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļīāļĢāļīāļāļāļĢāļāļĢāļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĻāļāđ, 18(1), 26-34. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsrc/article/view/209920
āļŠāļģāļāļąāļāļāļēāļāđāļĨāļāļēāļāļīāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ āļēāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē. (2560). āļŠāļ āļēāļ§āļ°āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļĒāļāļĩ 2559/2560: āđāļāļ§āļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļīāļĢāļđāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļĒāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāđāļēāļ§āļŠāļđāđāļĒāļļāļ Thailand 4.0. āļŠāļģāļāļąāļāļāļēāļāđāļĨāļāļēāļāļīāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ āļēāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē.
Bentley, K. (2010). The TKT course CLIL module. Cambridge University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Crystal, D. (2018). English as a global language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Longman.
Kim, J. E., Park, H., Jang, M., & Nam, H. (2017). Exploring flipped classroom effects on second language learnersâ cognitive processing. Foreign Language Annals, 50(2), 260â284.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4â17.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5â55.
Prapphal, K. (2000). Learner-centered approaches to English language teaching. Journal of Language Education, 12(1), 24â35.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
SchÃķn, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of MBU Lanna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
āļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļĩāđāđāļāđāļĢāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļĩāļāļīāļĄāļāđāđāļāđāļāļĨāļīāļāļŠāļīāļāļāļīāđāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢ
āļāđāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļĩāđāļāļĢāļēāļāļāđāļāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āđāļĢāļ·āđāļāļāđāļāļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāđāļĨāđāļĄāļāļĩāđāđāļāđāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļīāļāđāļŦāđāļāļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļąāļ§āļāļāļāļāļđāđāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāđāļēāļāļŦāļēāļāļĄāļĩāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļīāļāļāļĨāļēāļāđāļāđ āļāļđāđāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļāđāļĨāđāļ°āļāđāļēāļāļāļ°āļĢāļąāļāļāļīāļāļāļāļāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļāļāļāđāļāļāđāļāđāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāļāļđāđāđāļāļĩāļĒāļ§
