Tort liability of officers : Some problems concerning The operation calls on the liability authorities.

Abstract

This issue is a rising from the enforcement of the Officers Liability Act of 1996 on the issue of which the issuing officer is the perpetrator. However, they must be ordered to be liable by the order of the regulator. Which does not make the order unlawful. And the lawsuit against the offender is liable for damages, the Supreme Administrative Court reversed the ruling from the former cannot prosecute. Because of the need to apply administrative measures to file a lawsuit if there is a problem. In addition, during the period when the court ruled that the authorities had to enact administrative measures. It also results in the prosecutor not accepting that the different cases. This would have to be solved by defining the authorities who specifically enforce the administrative measures. Or the Legal execution department Implementing the administrative enforcement measures. Or prosecute the case to the court for the court to hear the case. As well as in the case of interest from the authorities, the offender is just a ruling of the Council of State. In all of the issues mentioned above, there is no provision of law to fix such problems.