Evaluation of the Competitive Capability and the Factors Affecting Competitive Capability: Case Study of Sattahip Commercial Port
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to evaluate the current competitive capability of Sattahip Commercial Port and to study the factors that affecting its competitive capability. The research subjects were 137 service providers and port users. The instrument was five-scale questionnaire. Data were analyzed for percentage, mean, standard deviation and stepwise-multiple regression. The results showed that the highest rating score of the evaluation of the competitive capability of Sattahip Commercial Port was found in “the determination on port selection” ( = 3.61, S.D. = 0.62) which was considered as high level, especially for the aspect of “the appropriateness of the port location” that indicated the advantage of Sattahip Commercial Port location. However, the lowest score was found in the “reliability” (
= 3.42, S.D. = 0.51) which was considered as moderate level. Evaluation of the factors affecting the competitive capability of Sattahip Commercial Port by using multiple regression analysis showed that there were two independent variables, including “port infrastructure” and “information technology and communication” that could significantly influence the competitive capability of Sattahip Commercial Port (p < 0.01, F = 33.640). These two factors could also predict the competitive capability of Sattahip Commercial Port at 32.40%. The predicted raw score equation of the competitive capability of Sattahip Commercial Port was Y = 1.178 + 0.383*(port infrastructure) + 0.291*(information technology and communication). The predicted standard score equation was Z = 0.329*(port infrastructure) + 0.290*( information technology and communication).
Article Details
Journal of TCI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies page for more information...
References
2.สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (27 มิถุนายน 2560). โครงการระเบียงเศรษฐกิจภาคตะวันออก. สืบค้นจาก http://www.nesdb.go.th/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=6382.
3.ประชาชาติธุรกิจ. (5 เมษายน2560). พลิกโฉมท่าเรือจุกเสม็ดรับ EEC เชื่อมคมนาคม"บก-น้ำ-อากาศ. สืบค้นจาก http://www.prachachat.net/ news_detail.php?newsid=1468383736
4.บุญฑริกา เสนีวงศ์ ณ อยุธยา และ วรพจน์ มีถม, “การกำหนดปัจจัยในการประเมินศักยภาพของท่าเรือด้านการขนส่งสินค้า,” การประชุมวิชาการระดับชาติ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น, 2556, หน้าที่ 254-262.
5.Yeo, G.-T., Roe, M., & Dinwoodie, J. “Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(6), pp.910-921, 2008.
6.Caldeirinha, V., Felicio J A., & Dionisio, A. “Effect of the container terminal Characteristics on performance,” Cefage-Ue Working paper, 2013.
7.Tongzon, J., & Heng, W. “Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals),” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(5), pp.405-424, 2005.
8.Zarei, S. “The Key Factors in Shipping Company’s Port Selection for Providing Their Supplies,” International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering Vol. 9, No.4, 2015, pp.1317-1321.
9.ประคอง กรรณสูต, สถิติเพื่อการวิจัยทาง พฤติกรรมศาสตร์, พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3 ฉบับปรุบปรุง แก้ไข. กรุงเทพฯ: จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, 2542.