Prototype Development for Learning Management Guidelines in 21st Century of Theological Education in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) Study the current conditions and the needs of instructors regarding 21st-century learning management in Christian theological institutions in Thailand; 2) Develop a prototype model for 21st-century learning management for these institutions, using user experience research and design-based research; and 3) Evaluate the prototype model of 21st-century learning management in terms of teaching methods and attitudes toward 21st-century learning, based on two evaluation criteria: appropriateness and feasibility.
The research was conducted in three phases according to these objectives. A purposive sampling method was used, involving 27 instructors from Christian theological institutions and 4 experts. Data were analyzed using content analysis, along with mean and standard deviation statistics.
The research finding indicated that
1) The key needs of instructors in Christian theological institutions included: (1.1) The role of theological institutions in training Christian leaders that align with their ultimate purpose; (1.2) Curriculum and instructional development that meets the needs of the church and local missions; (1.3) Learning and assessment systems that measure real outcomes and impact; (1.4) Learning based on real-life experiences that develop Christian life beyond theory or principle-based learning; (1.5) A shift from lecture-based and final exam-oriented instruction to participatory learning and assessment that reflects spiritual development.
2) The prototype model for 21st-century learning management consisted of five components based on Frankena’ s educational philosophy framework: ultimate goals, context, desired outcomes, educational principles, and practices.
3) The evaluation results showed that the appropriateness of the prototype model was at the highest level (mean = 4.64, SD = 0.34), and its feasibility was at a high level (mean = 4.18, SD = 0.44).
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- The articles have been published in academic Saengtham College Journal Is owned by Saengtham College Do not republish all text. Except permission from Saengtham College.
- Any content and comments Published in academic Saengtham College Journal. It is the responsibility of the author only.
References
ยุทธภัณฑ์ พินิจ, วิริยะ ทิพยวรการกูร, สิรพร วีระเศรษฐ์ศิริ, และ สาณุรักษ์ ฟ่องวาริน. (2564). ความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างกิจกรรมชีวิตคริสเตียนและผลที่เกิดขึ้นในชีวิตฝ่ายจิตวิญญาณตามการรับรู้ของคริสเตียนไทยในช่วงการแพร่ระบาดของโรคโควิด-19. วารสารมหาจุฬานาครทรรศน์, 8(12), 244-259.
Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From Data to Wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3-9.
Banks, R. (1999). Reenvisioning theological education: exploring a missional alternative to current models. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Brookfield, S. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. Jossey-Bass.
Coleman, B., & Goodwin, D. (2017). Designing UX: prototyping. SitePoint.
Das, R. (2015). Connecting Curriculum with Context: A Handbook for Context Relevant Curriculum Development in Theological Education. Langham Global Library.
Frankena, W. K. (Ed.). (1965a). Philosophy of education. Macmillan.
Frankena, W. K. (1965b). Three historical philosophies of education. Foresman.
Frankena, W. K. (1966). A model for analyzing a philosophy of education. High School Journal, 2(1), 8–13.
Graham, E., & Walton, H. (2018). Theological reflection: methods. SCM Press.
Habermas, R., & Issler, K. (1992). Teaching for reconciliation: foundations and practice of Christian educational ministry. Baker Book House.
Lausanne Movement. (2021, September 20). The Cape Town Commitment: A confession of faith and a call to action. https://lausanne.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/The-Cape-Town-Commitment-–-Pages-20-09-2021.pdf
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass.
Moon, J. A. (2018). A Handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Routledge.
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: how Asian thinks…and why. Free press.
Ott, B. (2016). Understanding and developing theological education. Langham Partnership.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. Ft Press.
Plueddemann, J., & Plueddemann, C. (1990). Pilgrims in progress. Harold Shaw.
Shaw, P. (2014). Transforming theological education: A practical handbook for integrative learning. Langham Global Library.
Thigpen, J. N. (Ed.). (2005). Teaching techniques: revitalizing methodology. Evangelical Training Association.
Thompson, J., Pattison, S., & Thompson, R. (2019). SCM study guide: theological reflection (2nd ed.). SCM Press.
Wilson, S. (1989). Defining development in social terms. In E.J. Elliston (Ed.), Christian relief and development: Developing workers for effective ministry (pp. 145-158). Word Pub.
Wright, C. J. H. (2006). The mission of God: unlocking the Bible's grand narrative. IVP LauAcademic.