Assessment of Implementation of the University of Rizal System Faculty’s Extension Activities

Authors

  • Evelyn P. Magdalena University of Rizal System Morong Campus, Philippines
  • Leni A. Avecilla University of Rizal System Pililla Campus, Philippines
  • Janeta S. Cabilin University of Rizal System Morong Campus, Philippines
  • Yonie SD. Timog University of Rizal System Morong Campus, Philippines
  • Perlita M. Angeles University of Rizal System Morong Campus, Philippines
  • Leonora J. Peñano University of Rizal System Morong Campus, Philippines
  • Wilma R. Lomangaya University of Rizal System Morong Campus, Philippines
  • Zenaida S. Angeles University of Rizal System Morong Campus, Philippines
  • Raquel F. Llaneta University of Rizal System Morong Campus, Philippines
  • Helen R. Blanquisco University of Rizal System Morong Campus, Philippines
  • Elenita P. Pateña University of Rizal System Pililla Campus, Philippines

Keywords:

focus group discussion, URS, extension activities, beneficiaries

Abstract

At the core of every higher education institutions’ aim is strengthening two of their four-fold functions, which are instruction and extension, to enable them to provide free access to functional literacy and livelihood programs among indigent communities. It is along this premise that this study aimed to assess the implementation of University of Rizal System’s literacy and livelihood extension activities in one of the communities in the eastern part of Rizal province. The study used a descriptive-evaluative research design, utilizing purposive random sampling technique and the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) to further validate the responses of the beneficiaries in the livelihood activities and in the literacy program, respectively. The results revealed that the respondents of the study evaluated the extension activities outstanding in all aspects. Planning and management and strategies both obtained a mean of 4.42, faculty trainer’s expertise had a mean of 4.45, and involvement of the participants obtained an average mean of 4.35. It was concluded, therefore, that the URS faculty’s culture of conducting extension activities is well-implemented and it truly addressed and augmented the needs of the beneficiaries in the community.

References

CHED Memo Order No. 32, Series of 2005, “Strengthening of the SUC’s/HEI’s in technology commercialization and poverty alleviation, employment generation, food production and sustainable development”. ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CMONo.32-s2013.pdf www.com.

De Leon, H. S. (2008). Textbook on the Philippine Constitution. Manila, Philippines: REX Book Store Inc.

Dilao, A. B. (2011) “Impact of community extension programs on the residents of barangay catadman-manabay”, Retrieved local.lsu.edu.ph/ institutional_research_office/publications/ vol.15no.6/6.html.

Padua, R. N. (2006). Elements of research and statistical models. Cagayan De Oro, Philippines: MSPC Publishing House.

Rama, Radhakrishna et.al. (2014). Integrating research and extension activities: An exploratory study. Journal of Extension, 52, 2, Retrieved from https://joe.org/joe/2014february/a1.php2016 www.com.

Sherif, M. (2016). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349-356. Retrieved from https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Sherif/Sherif_1958a.html.

Shonia, S. (2012). Improving livelihood of rural women through income generating activities in Bangladesh. (Doctoral Dissertation) Retrieved from https://www.
researchgate.net/.../279828151 www.googlescholar.com.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-28

How to Cite

Magdalena, E. P., Avecilla, L. A., Cabilin, J. S., Timog, Y. S., Angeles, P. M., Peñano, L. J., Lomangaya, W. R., Angeles, Z. S., Llaneta, R. F., Blanquisco, H. R., & Pateña, E. P. (2016). Assessment of Implementation of the University of Rizal System Faculty’s Extension Activities. ASEAN Journal of Education, 2(1), 101–111. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AJE/article/view/180781

Issue

Section

Research Articles