Networking Model Involving Participation in Education Development: A Case of Demonstration Schools

Authors

  • Adithak Suviwattanachai Graduate School, Suan Dusit University
  • Yalisa Tonsorn Faculty of Management Science, Suan Dusit University
  • Chanasuek Nichanon Faculty of Education, Suan Dusit University
  • Sirote Pholpuntin Faculty of Education, Suan Dusit University

Keywords:

Model, Network, Demonstration school

Abstract

This study sought to create a networking model concerning participation in education development, and to assess the applicability of such a model, taking a set of demonstration schools as a case study. Informants included targeted schools’ management executives and teachers, representatives from the schools’ alumni associations and alumni members, and a group of experts, forming a cohort of 20 individuals in total. Research tools included interviews, applicability assessment, and quantitative data analyses including such statistics as mean, standard deviation, and basic quantitative analysis. Research results are as follows:
(1) Building a network that facilitates participation in education development. Our in-depth interviews seeking to create case-study-based networking model involving participation in education development found that seven components constituted common elements embodied in the cooperative networks for education development across the four demonstration schools studied. The seven common elements were: (1) mutual recognition of shared perspective with regard to the existence of the network; (2) determination of the network’s shared vision; (3) identification of the network’s shared benefits and interests; (4) identification of each network member’s involvement; (5) reciprocal network reinforcement; (6) strategic interdependence; and (7) interactive exchanges among network members.
(2) Our assessment of the applicability of the networking model involving participation in education development found that the proposed model is of high quality in all aspects. The propriety aspect had the highest mean of 4.38 and a standard deviation of 0.23, followed by the evaluation accountability aspect having a mean of 4.29 and a standard deviation of 0.23. The feasibility aspect had the lowest mean of 4.00 and a standard deviation of 0.38.

References

Charoenwongsak, K. (2012). Network management: an important strategy for the success of education reform. Management and Development Mahasarakarm University. 4(1), 192-207.

Iamdee, S., Chaiyakit, M., Ngaorangsee K., & Chanchalo. S. (2013). Development of networking management system encouraging participation in educational management: A case of Office of Primary Education District. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 15, 216-224.

Office of the National Education Commission. (2002). National Education Act of 1999 (Second Amendment). Bangkok: Phrik Wan Graphic.

Saunphakdee, B., Chatruprachiwin, C., & Chaemchoi, S. (2016). Formations of cooperative networks aimed to develop educational management in schools under the supervision of municipality. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 18(4), 99-113.

Sonsong. N., & Inrak. S. (2018). Participatory management conducted by the network for promoting the management of provincial secondary education. Suan Dusit Graduate School Academic Journal, 14(1), 115-132.

Thepkraiwan P. (2011). The development of a collaborative networking model in pursuit of quality education management in small primary schools. (Doctoral dissertation, Khon Kaen University). KKU Library.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-26

How to Cite

Suviwattanachai, A., Tonsorn, Y., Nichanon, C., & Pholpuntin, S. (2023). Networking Model Involving Participation in Education Development: A Case of Demonstration Schools. ASEAN Journal of Education, 5(2), 44–52. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AJE/article/view/269778

Issue

Section

Research Articles