Main Article Content

Wei Meng


 文化是一个民族区别与其他民族的重要标志, 一个民族的传统文化被弱化或被抛弃, 则会
直接导致民族稳定的共同心理素质被弱化, 最终加速民族的消亡。 全面复兴中国传统文化是建立
文化自信和实现文化繁荣的重要途径, 是实现中华民族伟大复兴的必要条件。 孟子思想是中华民
族的共同财富, 对中国历史有深远的影响, 如何正确解读和应用孟子思想对传统文化复兴具有重
要意义。 研究中采用了定性研究、 文献分析、 逻辑推理、 概念分析和历史唯物主义、 唯物辩证法
等研究方法, 对被学术界标注 “复古” 标签的孟子 “井田制” 思想进行重新阐释, 揭示了孟子的
“井田制” 思想的本质是基于保民、 安邦、 通过 “八夫共井” 模式对生产要素进行整合, 进而恢
复和促进生产力发展的土地国有制思想。 该思想对解决中国现代面临因 “城镇化” 等原因造成
的土地抛荒问题和宅基地闲置问题具有一定参考作用。 中国政府在农村土地改革中采用的坚持集
体所有权, 落实农户承包权, 放活土地经营权的 “三权分置” 改革, 是孟子 “保民” 和整合生产
要素、 恢复生产的 “民生” 思想在实践中得到应用的具体表现形式。


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Meng, W. (2018). RESEARCH ON MENCIUS’S “SQUARE FIELDS SYSTEM” THOUGHT BASED ON PEOPLE’S LIVELIHOOD. Chinese Journal of Social Science and Management, 2(2), 38-54. Retrieved from
Research Articles


Chen, Z. K. (2017, November 7). 19 Key words: keep the original intention in mind and keep the mission in mind. Overseas edition of People’s Daily, p. 1. [in Chinese]

Duan, P. X. (1986). An outline of Mencius’s rule of law by the king of sages. Journal of southwest institute of nationalities (social sciences edition), (1), 38-42. [in Chinese]

Gong, X. Z. (2013). On the legal restrictions on private land ownership in the Tang dynasty. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophical and social science edition), (34), 58-62. [in Chinese]

Guo, M. R. (1982). Ten critical articles of History volume two of the complete works of guo moruo. Beijing: People’s publishing house. [in Chinese]

Gao, X. & Luo, M. (2009). Review and prospect of China’s rural economic reform in the past 30 years. The economic aspect, (2), 36-39. [in Chinese]

Han, S. (2001). Causes and countermeasures of the damage to the abandoned land in rural areas. Rural cooperative economic management, (11), 36-38. [in Chinese]

Jin, J. F. (1983). History of Chinese slavery. Shanghai: Shanghai people’s publishing house. [in Chinese]

Li, C. (2014). What is the historical materialism. Beijing: China Industry and Commerce Joint Publishing house. [in Chinese]

Li, Y. (2008). Confirmation about the connotation and extension of the concept. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences edition), 10(2), 22-25. [in Chinese]

Lin, G. (1990). History of China’s feudal land system. Beijing: China social sciences press. [in Chinese]

Meng, K. (2014). Mencius Gongsun Chou1. Beijing: Yanshan Publishing House. [in Chinese]

Meng, K. (2014). Mencius·JinXin2. Beijing: Yanshan Publishing House. [in Chinese]

Meng, K. (2014). Mencius·Liang hui Wang2. Beijing: Yanshan Publishing House. [in Chinese]

Meng, K. (2014). Mencius·LouLi2. Beijing: Yanshan Publishing House. [in Chinese]

Meng, K. (2014). Mencius·Tengwen Gong1. Beijing: Yanshan Publishing House. [in Chinese]

P. R.C Government. (2017). Opinions on the implementation of China’s excellent traditional culture inheritance and development project. Retrieved September 13, 2018, from zhengce/2017-01/25/content_5163472.htm [in Chinese]

Quan. R. (2008). Is the square fields system nominally public for the state? History Learning, (4), 21. [in Chinese]

U. S. Department of State, Share America. (2018). Talk about public lands in the United States. Retrieved September 13, 2018, from

Xia, Z. N. & Chen, Z. L. (2009). Ci Hai (6th ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Dictionary Publishing. [in Chinese]

Yang B. J. (1962). Mencius translated and annotated. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. [in Chinese]

Zhang, H., Zhou, X. & Yang, F. (2018). Research on the power and implementation path of land circulation under the background of three-right separation. Water power, 44(7), 15-19. [in Chinese]

Zhang, Y. (2008). An analysis of the changes of China’s traditional social taxation system. Legal System and Society, (5), 4-6. [in Chinese]

Zou, J. M. (1986). Referring to the legal system of the king is not the political thought of the ancient Meng Ke. Journal of China youth institute of politics, (4), 51-54. [in Chinese]