THE INFLUENCE OF SELF-SACRIFICAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPOYEES’ HELPING BEHAVIOR
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
One of the important factors that affect organizational performance is employee behavior. In addition to the role of employees, mutual assistance between employees is conducive to enhancing cohesion within the organization, as well as interdependence and collaboration, thereby promoting the organization to make full use of its advantages. With increasingly ferce economic competition, the role of self-sacrifce leadership in leading an organization to enhance competitiveness and cope with difculties has become increasingly prominent, and it also has a signifcant impact on employee behavior. How to promote employee help through self-sacrifcing leadership behavior is an issue worthy of in-depth study. However,
there is currently little research on the effect of self-sacrifcing leadership on employee help, especially in China. To further explore the mechanism of self-sacrifcing leadership on employee help behavior, and provide a theoretical basis for self-sacrifcing leadership to promote employee help behavior, this article is based on the social exchange theory, social learning theory, pro-social behavior and other theories. The selected theories were used to analyze the influence mechanism of self-sacrifcing leadership on employee help behavior, with the results showing that 1) self-sacrifcing leadership promotes employee help behavior, 2) leadership identifcation and sense of organizational afliation play intermediary roles, and 3) human relationships and employee traditionality play moderating roles.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Chinese Journal of Social Science and Management Editorial Division
The Office of Research and Development, Panyapiwat Institute of Management
85/1 Moo 2, Chaengwattana Rd., Bang Talat, Pakkred, Nonthaburi 11120, Thailand
Tel. 02 855 01048 E-mail: cjssm@pim.ac.th
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599-670.
Choi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1998). On the leadership function of self-sacrifce. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 475-501.
De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When does self-sacrifcial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on the followers’ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887-899.
De Cremer, D., Van Dijke, M., & Bos, M. (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self sacrifcial leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(5), 466-475.
De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Cooperation as a function of leader self‐sacrifce, trust, and identifcation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, (5), 355-369.
Fei, X. T. (1948). Earthbound China. Zhonghua Book Company.
Graen, G. B., Liden, R. C., & Hoel, W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 686-872.
Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A feld study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484-500.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.
Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & Dijke, M. (2012). When do leaders sacrifce? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifce. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 883-896.
Kidwell, R. E., Mossholder, K. W., & Bennett, N. (1997). Cohesion and organizational citizenship behavior: A multi-level analysis using work groups and individuals. Journal of Management, 23 (6), 775-793.
King, E. B., George, J. M., & Hebl, M. R. (2005). Linking personality to helping behaviors at work: An interactional perspective. Journal of Personality, 73(3), 585-608.
Li, R., Tian, X. M., & Sun, J. Q. (2014). The mechanism of self-sacrifcing leadership on employees’ knowledge sharing. Nankai Business Review, (5), 24-32. [in Chinese]
Li, Y., Zhang, W. H., & Long, L. R. (2015). How self-sacrifcial leadership influences subordinates’ work performance: The mediating roles of strategic orientation and supervisor identifcation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(5), 653-662. [in Chinese]
Liu, Y. (2016). The mechanism of ethical leadership on employee helping behavior a self-concept perspective. Economic Management Journal, (1), 84-93. [in Chinese]
Organ, D. W. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
Shao, P., Resick, C. J., & Hargis, M. B. (2011). Helping and harming others in the workplace: The roles of personal values and abusive supervision. Human Relations, 64(8), 1051-1078.
Sunaryo, S., & Suyono, J. (2014). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: A key to organizational identifcation and interpersonal helping? World Review of Business Research, 4(2), 264-278.
Thangsitthiworarat, S., & Chen, A. (2017). The development of innovation management strategies in enterprise growth stage——A case study of adaptive innovation management system in wing on rice trading corporation in Thailand. Chinese Journal of Social Science and Management, (2), 65-75. [in Chinese]
Tao, S. Q., & Shang, H. Y. (2018). Construction surveying of CRP digital campus information platform——Taking Tongren Polytechnic College as an example. Chinese Journal of Social Science and Management, (1), 16-27. [in Chinese]
Tian, X. M. L. R. (2015). Can self-sacrificing leadership promote forward-looking behavior of employees?——The mediating effect of responsibility perception and its boundary conditions. Acta Psychologica Sinica, (12), 1285-1472. [in Chinese]
Tu, X, Y., Liu, L. J., Zhang, Y. P., Peng, Y. Y., & Lin, C. L. (2020). How prosocial motivation and helping behavior influence contextual performance: The mechanism and context situation of cognitive trust. Nankai Business Review, (2), 203-213. [in Chinese]
Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243-296.
Wang, G. F., Huang, W. L., & Zhong, Y. Y. (2013). Self-sacrifcial leadership and follower’s prosocial behavior: Evidence from Taiwan’s service industry. Chinese Journal of Management, (9), 1308-1315. [in Chinese]
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
Xu, Z. T., & Luo, J. L. (2016). Research on the relationship between self-sacrifcial leadership and employee creativity: Multilevel role of support climate for creativity. Science of Science and Management of S&T, (37), 166-180. [in Chinese]
Xu, Z. T., & Qu, Y. Y., & Luo, J. L. (2018). Research on the relationship between self-sacrifcial leadership and employee creativity: Multilevel role of support climate for creativity. Science of Science and Management of S&T, 39(11), 142-157. [in Chinese]
Yang, Z. F. (1999). The construction of interpersonal relationships and interpersonal emotions. In G. S. Yang (Ed.), Indigenous psychology research (pp. 428-436). Laurel Book Company.
Yang, G. S. (1996). Exploration of cultural psychology. Laurel Book Company. [in Chinese]
Zhong, H., Tian, Q., & Bai, J. Y. (2019). Research on the mechanism of employee’s help behavior on ethical leadership based on social cognitive theory. Chinese Journal of Management, (1), 64-71. [in Chinese]
Zhou, R. Y., Long, L. R., & Zhang, J. W. (2018). Influence of self-sacrifcial leadership on team performance: The roles of team cohesion, psychological capital, and psychological entitlement. Science of Science and Management of S&T, 39(8), 145-160. [in Chinese]