‘Green Bangkok 2030’: The Case Study of Obligatory Delegation toward Privately-Owned Neighborhood Public Space Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/bei.2021.7Keywords:
Privately-owned Public Space, Green Urban Public Space, Local Public Policy, BangkokAbstract
Green Bangkok 2030 has been the BMA’s policy by enhancing 30% of the coverage areas
of green public space by 2030. Amidst its numerous constraints such as the land acquisition, the
post-occupancy management, and thevibrant programming creation, theresearchershavestudied
upon the chance in enhancing green public space via the National Health Assembly’s mechanism
and via the policy dialoguing among communities, civil actors, state agencies, and private sectors,
since 2018. Oneof the conditionshas been incorporating more with private sectors. This study has
beenconducted via participatoryobservationontwoneighborhood park’s casestudies inBangkok.
By challenging upon the enhancing privately-owned public spaces, two prominent questions are
addressed; 1) what the conditions are in persuading private sectors into the comanaging scenarios
along with the BMA; and 2) how the operations include non-state agencies in the process? The
study highlights that BMA has gained some land plots from private sectors for being public green
spaces and enthusiastically engaged in creating good programs upon them because of new land
tax policy. However, the study underlies the significant managerial gaps within BMA’s internal
bureaucracy to carry on if any exponentially accelerating numbers of neighborhood park project
comparing to its limited fiscal expenditure. The recent insights from this study shed some lights
upon the triangular model of the working group at the district level including state, community,
and private sector as a commission platform.
References
Carmona, M. and Megalhaes, C.D. (2006). Public Space Management: Present and Potential.
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49(1): 75-99.
Dimmer, C. (eds.) (2013). Privately Owned Public Space: The International Perspective |
Sustainable Urban Regeneration Series 25, Tokyo: Center for Sustainable Urban
Regeneration, The University of Tokyo.
Dollinger, M. et al. (2019). Working Together in Learning Analytics Towards the Co-Creation of
Value. Journal of Learning Analytics 6(2): 10-26.
Hass, T. and Mehaffy, M.W. (2019). Introduction: The Future of Public Space. Urban Design
International 24: 1-3.
Kongphunphin,C. and Iamtrakul, P. (2020).A Classification of Thai Urban Public Spaces: A Case of
Bangkok Mertropolitan Area, Thailand. Journal of Architecture/Planning Research and
Studies 17(2): 41-58.
Leclercq, E. (2018). Privatisation of the Production of Public Space. Delft: Architecture and the
Built Environment, Delft University.
Mierzejewska, L. (2011). Appropriation of Public Urban Spaces as an Effect of Privatisation and
Globalisation. Quaestiones Geographicae 30(4): 39-46.
Nasution, A.D. and Zahrah, W. (2012) Public Open Space Privatization and Quality of Life, Case
Study Merdeka Square Medan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 36: 466-475.
Nasution, A.D. and Zahrah, W. (2015). The Space is Not Ours, the Life of Public Open Space in
Gated Community in Medan, Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 202:
-151.
Nasution, A.D. and Zahrah, W. (2017). Privately-Owned Public Space for Public Use. Asian Journal
of Quality of Life 2(7): 11-19.
Németh, J. (2009). Defining a Public: The Management of Privately Owned Public Space. Urban
Studies 46(11): 2463-2490.
Németh, J. (2012). Controlling the Commons: How Public is Public Space?. Urban Affairs Review
(6): 811-835.
Németh, J. and Schmidt, S. (2011). The Privatization of Public Space: Modeling and Measuring
Publicness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38: 5-23.
Nissen, S. (2008). Urban Transformation: From Public and Private Space to Spaces of Hybrid
Character. Czech Sociological Review 44 (6): 1129-1149.
Reyes, R.C. (2016). Public Space as Contested Space: The Battle over the Use, Meaning and
Function of Public Space. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 6(3):
-207.
Sahakian, M. et.al. (2020). Green Public Spaces in the Cities of South and Southeast Asia:
Protecting Needs towards Sustainable Well-Being. The Journal of Public Space 5(2):
-110.
Sijbandij, J. (2018). The Privatisation of Public Space in Amsterdam: Divergent Perception of
Public and Private Sector Actors. Unpublished Master Thesis in Urban and Regional
Planning, University of Amsterdam.
Tang, K. (2018). Privatization of Public Space: Spatial Practice in the Umbrella Movement. Space
and Culture 22(4): 449-459.
Usavagovitwong, N. (2019). Co-Creating Public Space: Attitude, Process, and Opportunity. The
Architectural Journal of the Association of Siamese Architects under Patronage 1:
-81.
ฐานข้อมูลอิเล็คทรอนิกส์
Active, The. (2021). คลองสาน สานมือ ร่วมสานเมือง : จากประวัติศาสตร์สู่อนาคตกาล, Retrieved from
https://theactive.net/read/klongsan-together-shape-urban-future/
Citycracker. (2021). Seven Perspectives in Creating Public Space, ‘Crack City for Public Space
Seminar’. Retrieved from https://citycracker.co/city-crack/city-event/crackcityforpublicspace/
Cloud, The. (2020) Retrieved from https://readthecloud.co/hua-lampong-temple-park/
Cloud, The. (2021) The Cloud x we!park. Retrieved from https://readthecloud.co/hua-lampongtemple-
park/
National Health Assembly (2018) การพัฒนาพื้นที่สาธารณะเพื่อสุขภาวะและการพัฒนาอย่างยั่งยืน: เขตเมือง.
Retrieved from https://www.nationalhealth.or.th/_external/210861_เอกสารหลัก_PS up.pdf
Lee, D. (2020). Whose Space is Privately Owned Public Space? Exclusion, Underuse and the Lack
of Knowledge and Awareness. Urban Research & Practice. doi:10.1080/17535069.2020.1
Standard, the (2020) กทม. ตั้งเป้าเพิ่มพื้นที่สีเขียวให้คนกรุง 10 ตร.ม./คน ภายใต้โครงการ Green Bangkok
Retrieved from https://thestandard.co/green-bangkok-2030/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Views and opinions expressed in the journal do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
