The transportation accessibility and land use in the context of Chiang Mai comprehensive plan (4th revision) in 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/bei.2023.9Keywords:
Land Use, Transportation Network, Accessibility, Chiang Mai City Plan, Space SyntaxAbstract
This study was conducted to analyze morphological structure of the Chiang Mai city plan (4th Revision) through value of accessibility of transportation network with the city’s land use in the future. Research methods employed were the following: document analysis; surveying; developing a Geo-Informatics database; spatial model, Space Syntax; and overlay analysis on Geo-Informatics System. The study found that the Chiang Mai City Plan (4th revision) defines main land use patterns in the future. Land use can be very dense from city centers and sparse in suburban areas. The morphological structure of the transport network is characterized as a grid pattern in the center of Chiang Mai city. It is surrounded by a ring road to deflect traffic from the city center and radius roads connecting the city center with the surrounding urban community. Analysis of the accessibility values of the transportation networks using the Space Syntax model, found that the average global, local and connectivity integration value were 0.147122, 1.01382 and 2.22492 respectively. It has high integration values and relates to the main land use for residential and commercial areas. However, the morphological characteristics of the transportation networks with high accessibility value are super-blocks and surrounded by main roads. There are considerations for development the inter connection of main roads and secondary roads within a block can prevent congestion problems. In addition, the main roads have high value of accessibility that crisscrosses the rural and agriculture land of the city. This may affect the sparse urban development along roads.
References
Al_Sayed, K, et al. (2018). Space Syntax methodology. A Teaching textbook for the MSc.Spatial
Design: Architecture & Cities. Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL, London: UCL press.
Bartholomew, H. (1955). Land use in American cities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burgess, E.W. (1925). The growth of city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chiang Mai Province. (2022). Information of Chiang Mai province 2022. Retrieved September 5, 2022,
from http://chiangmai.go.th/managing/public/D8/8D17Jan2022133138.pdf
Department of Provincial of Administration. (2022). Population statistics. Retrieved September 25, 2022,
from https://stat.bora.dopa.go.th/new_stat/webPage/statByYear.php
Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning. (2022). Chiang Mai comprehensive
plan (The fourth modification) in 2022. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from
https://onedptgis.dpt.go.th/onedpt-complain-ppl/announce/15/10568?fbclid=
IwAR1xpomgIQ69KxPmtd7XUzizQVfeIyPCbZrVZE64wmJVDMIqGjT8OqjYqE8
Harris. C.D. & Ullman, E.L. (2020). Multiple nuclei model. Retrieved from: October 10, 2022, from
https://planningtank.com/settlement-geography/multiple-nuclei-model
Hillier, B. (1996). Space is a machine. London: The University of Cambridge.
Hillier, B. (1999). “Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction in equalities in deform grids”
Urban design international (1999). Retrieved October 15, 2022, from
https://www.academia.edu/12147617/Centrality_as_a_process_by_bill_hillier
Hoyt, H. (1939). The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities.
Washington, DC: Federal Housing Administration.
Kasemsuk, A. (2018). Space Syntax; One of the studies of morphology. Bangkok: Magic publication.
Summaniti, L. and Summaniti, S. (2017). Spatial transformation and accessibility efficiency of
transportation network with land use in the context of Chiang Mai comprehensive plan.
Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, 14, 105-126.
Suppawimut, V. (2018). Agricultural land losses in surrounded area of Chiang Mai middle ring
road. VRU Research and Development Journal Science and Technology, 13, 103-113.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Built Environment Inquiry

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the journal do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
