Employees’ Responses to Hybrid Work Environment

Authors

  • Chaiwat Riratanaphong Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Thammasat University
  • Artitaya Klongnarong Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Thammasat University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/bei.2024.8

Keywords:

Physical Environment, Hybrid Working, Work Performance, Employees’ Feedback, Online Media

Abstract

As we navigate through the ongoing pandemic, there is growing attention towards the hybrid work environment, which is increasingly seen as the preferred approach for the post-COVID world of work. A thorough examination of existing literature has revealed the diverse effects of hybrid working on employees and their work. This study aims to assess employees' feedback on the hybrid work environment and explore how various aspects of the physical environment are related to factors affecting their work performance. To achieve this, we conducted a case study involving an online news media company based in Thailand, with the objective of investigating the practical application of existing research findings. The research methodology employed for this study included an interview with a general manager and a questionnaire survey designed to evaluate employee satisfaction, perceived support for productivity, and opinions regarding the correlation between physical environment aspects and factors influencing work performance. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were utilized in this research. Our findings clearly indicate that workplace concepts and the arrangement of work environments are significantly influenced by organizational context, including factors such as business type, organizational structure, and staff characteristics. These factors play a crucial role in shaping employee satisfaction and perceived support for productivity. Moreover, we observed that factors contributing to employee satisfaction also have a direct impact on individual and team perceived support for productivity. Notably, physical workplace conditions and the use of information and communication technology (ICT) are closely connected to various factors that affect work performance. Through this study, we have provided insights into the relationship between elements of the physical environment and factors that influence employee performance.

References

Abrams, Z. (2019). The future of remote work. American Psychological Association. Retrieved

September 3, 2021, from http://apa.org/monitor/2019/10/cover-remote-work

Bangkok Post (2022). The best of both world. Retrieved October 6, 2021, from http://

bangkokpost.com/life/social-and-lifestyle/2229795/the-best-of-both-worlds

Beyer, J. E., & Marshall, J. (1981). The Interpersonal Dimension of Collegiality. Nursing Outlook,

, 29(11): 662-665

Budie, B., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Kemperman, A., & Weijs-Perree, M. (2019). Employee

satisfaction with the physical work environment: the importance of a need based

approach. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 23(1), pp. 36-49

Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020). Employed persons working at home, workplace, and time spent

working at each location. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from hppt://bls.gov/news.release/

atus.t06.htm

Fenker, M. (2008). Towards a theoretical framework for usability of buildings, in Alexander, K. (Ed.)

Usability of Workplaces: Phase 2, International Council for Research and Innovation in

Building and Construction, Rotterdam

Freihoefer, K., Guerin, D., Martin, C., Kim, H.Y., & Brigham, J.K. (2015). Occupants’ satisfaction with,

and physical readings of, thermal, acoustic, and lighting conditions of sustainable offie

workspaces. Indoor and Built Environment, 24(4), pp. 457-472

Gartner (2021). Gartner CFO Survey. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://www.gartner.com/

en/newsroom/press-releases/2020-04-03-gartner-cfo-surey-reveals-74-percent-oforganizations-to-shift-some-employees-to-remote-work-permanently2

Graham, G., & Greenhill, A. (2013). Exploring interaction: print and online news media synergies.

Internet Research, 23(1). pp. 89-108

Grewal, D., Janakiraman, R., Kalyanam, K., Kanan, P.K., Ratchford, B., Song, R., & Tolerico, S. (2010).

Strategic online and offlne retailing pricing: a review and research agenda. Journal of

Interactive Marketing, 24(2), pp. 138-54

Grubenmann, S., & Meckel, M. (2014). Metaphors of occupational identity: traces of a changeable

workplace in journalism. The 74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management,

Philadelphia, PA, USA. August 4 - 5, 2014

Halford, S. (2005). Hybrid workspace: re-spatialisations of work, organisation and management.

New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), pp. 19-33

Hillier, B., & Leaman, B. (1976). Architecture as a discipline. Journal of Architectural Research, 5(1),

pp. 28-32

Huang, E., Davison, K., Shreve, S., Davis, T., Bettendorf, E., & Nair, A. (2006). Bridging Newsrooms

and Classrooms: Preparing the Next Generation of Journalists for Converged Media.

Journalism & Communication Monographs, 8(3), pp. 221–262

Illegems, V., & Verbeke, A. (2004), Telework: What does it mean for management. Long Range

Planning, 37(4), pp. 319-334

Kamaruzzaman, S.N., Egbu, C.O., Zawawi, E.M.A., Karim, S.B.A., & Woon, C.J. (2015). Occupants’

satisfaction toward building environmental quality: structural equation modeling

approach. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(5), pp. 1-21

Kirk, J. & Belovics, R. (2006). Making e-working work. Journal of Employment Counseling, 43(1), pp.

-4606

Knight, P.J., & Westbrook, J.D. (1999). Comparing Employees in Traditional Job Structures vs

Telecommuting Jobs Using Herzberg’s Hygiene & Motivators. Engineering Management

Journal, 11, pp. 15-20

Kowalski, K.B., & Swanson, J.A. (2005). Critical success factors in developing teleworking programs.

Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12, pp. 236-249

Mangani, A., & Tarrini, E. (2017). Who survives a recession? Specialization against diversifiation in

the digital publishing industry. Online Information Review, 41(1), pp. 19-34

Matli, W. (2020). The changing work landscape as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic: insights from

remote workers life situations in South Africa. International Journal of Sociology and

Social Policy, 40(9/10), pp. 1237-1256

Microsoft (2021). The Work Trend Index: The next great disruption is hybrid work - are we ready?

Retrieved October 6 2021, from http://microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend-index/

hybrid-work

Mwiya, M., Phiri, J., & Lyoko, G. (2015). Public Crime Reporting and Monitoring System Model Using

GSM and GIS Technologies: A Case of Zambia Police Service. International Journal of

Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 4(11), pp. 207-226

Nilles, J. (1975). Telecommunications and organizational decentralization”, IEEE Transactions on

Communications, 23, (10), pp. 1142-1147

Shelly, G.B., Cashman, T.J., Waggoner, Gloria, A.W., & Waggoner, W.C. (1998). Discovering

Computers 98: A Link to the Future: World Wide Web Enhanced, Course Technology,

Massachusetts

Van der Voordt, D. J. M., & Van Wegen, H. B. R. (2005). Architecture in use: an introduction to the

programming, design and evaluation of buildings. UK: Architectural Press

Windlinger, L., Nenonen, S., & Airo, K. (2016). Specifiation and empirical exploration of a usability

concept in the workplace. Facilities, 34 (11/12), pp. 649-661

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Riratanaphong, C., & Klongnarong, A. (2024). Employees’ Responses to Hybrid Work Environment. Built Environment Inquiry, 23(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.14456/bei.2024.8

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย (Research Articles)