Effect of Three Vegetations on Rainwater Retention in Extensive Green Roofs: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/bei.2025.2Keywords:
Green Roof, Water Retention, C3, C4, CAMAbstract
A green roof is a building innovation that plays a role in sustainable rainwater management.
This research aimed to observe the effects of three vegetation (C3, C4, and CAM), which had different photosynthesis processes on rainwater retention efficiency. The operation experiment was conducted by installing four experiment boxes: a concrete roof box and a green roof test box planted with C3 (Arachis pintoi Krapov.&W.C.Greg.), C4 (Axonopus compressus (Sw.) P.Beauv.), and CAM (Callisia repens.) to compare the rainwater retention efficiency. Using methods to collect rainwater data in Bangkok from July to October and transform data to simulate rain events and antecedent dry weather periods (ADWP), respectively. Simulated rain events were conducted as following; Event 1: moderate rain event: 22 min with ADWP 2 days, Event 2: heavy rain event: 100 min with ADWP 3 days, and Event 3: moderate rain event: 26 min with ADWP 4 days.
Findings illustrated the water use efficiency of vegetation was the significant factor affecting the rainwater retention efficiency of green roofs. C4 had excellent rainwater retention efficiency, followed by C3 and CAM. In Event 1, C4 performed the best retention, followed by C3, and CAM (77-82%, 45-60%, and 27-28%), respectively. In Event 2, C4 and C3 retained 9-11% and 1-6% of rainwater, while CAM did not retain rainwater. In addition, in Event 3, C4 still showed the highest retention capacity, followed by CAM, and C3 (70-73%, 57-64%, and 40-54%), respectively. In addition, measured weather data during experiments (Rainfall intensity, antecedent dry weather periods: ADWP, and weather data) contributed significant factors in plants transpiration. As a result, a C4 plant, which has the highest transpiration rate and there is the highest requirement for water in the growth process as well, performed the best rainwater retention. Furthermore, the physical characteristics of C4 as a ground cover crop with high density and large leaves brought better water interception ability than C3 and CAM. Consequently, C4 (Axonopus compressus (Sw.) P.Beauv.) was the most efficient vegetation for rainwater retention. However, a sufficient irrigation system and maintenance strategies should be designed before application.
References
เอก ปนาทกูล และ พาสินี สุนากร. (2560). การพัฒนาระบบหลังคาเขียวที่มีน้ำหนักเบาโดยวิธีให้น้ำใต้ผิว. (Theses
Non-fiction). มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์, Retrieved from https://portal.lib.ku.ac.th/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01514a&AN=klc.b1562189&site=eds-live
https://portal.lib.ku.ac.th/login?url=https://www.lib.ku.ac.th/KUthesis/2560/ek-pan-all.pdf Available from EBSCOhost Kasetsart Library Catalog database.
กนกวลี สุธีธร. (2551). หลังคาเขียว: ทางเลือกเพื่อการจัดการน้ำฝน. Retrieved from http://www.land.arch.chula.ac.th/pdf/greenroof.pdf
กันติทัต ทับสุวรรณ, พาสินี สุนากร, และ ชนิกานต์ ยิ้มประยูร. (2562). ประสิทธิภาพในการลดอุณหภูมิและเสียงรบกวน ของระบบหลังคาเขียวบนหลังคาเหล็กรีดลอน. ACADEMIC JOURNAL of ARCHITECTURE, 68, 99-114.
ฐาปกรณ์ สากลปัญญา และ วิรุฬห์ คำชุม. (2564). แบบ จำลอง เพื่อ ศึกษา ความ สามารถ การ เป็น ฉนวน กัน ความ ร้อน ของ หลังคา เขียว. การ ประชุม วิชาการ วิศวกรรม โยธา แห่ง ชาติ ครั้ง ที่ 26, 26.
ธีรภัทร จำรัสพันธุ์. (2564). การเปรียบเทียบอิทธิพลของพืชคลุมหลังคาสามชนิดต่อสมรรถนะของแผงเซลล์แสงอาทิตย์บนหลังคา. (ปริญญาโท). มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์,
ยิ่งยศ เงินมาก. (2550). การเลือกใช้วัสดุเหลือใช้เพื่อชะลอการไหลของน้ำสำหรับ "หลังคาเขียว". จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, Retrieved from https://doi.nrct.go.th/ListDoi/listDetail?Resolve_DOI=10.14457/CU.the.2007.1123
วราวุฒิ ธนาวุฒิวัฒนา. (2552). ประสิทธิผลในการใช้หลังคาปลูกต้นไม้เพื่อลดความร้อนสำหรับสภาพภูมิอากาศร้อนชื้น. (ปริญญาโท). มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร,
อนุชา จาเกาะ, พาสินี สุนากร, ชนิกานต์ ยิ้มประยูร, และ โสภา วิศิษฎ์ศักดิ์. (2556). สมรรถนะการลดการถ่ายเทความร้อนของแผ่นปลูกพืชบนหลังคา.
Akther, M., He, J., Chu, A., Huang, J., & Van Duin, B. (2018). A Review of Green Roof Applications for Managing Urban Stormwater in Different Climatic Zones. Sustainability, 10(8). doi:10.3390/su10082864
Carter, T. L., & Rasmussen, T. C. (2006). Hydrologic behavior of vegetated roofs 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42(5), 1261-1274.
Dunnett, N., & Kingsbury, N. (2008). Planting green roofs and living walls: Timber press Portland, OR.
Fioretti, R., Palla, A., Lanza, L. G., & Principi, P. (2010). Green roof energy and water related performance in the Mediterranean climate. Building and Environment, 45(8), 1890-1904. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.03.001
FLL. (2002). Guidelines for the Planning, Execution and Upkeep of Green-roof sites.
Getter, K. L., Rowe, D. B., & Andresen, J. A. (2007). Quantifying the effect of slope on extensive green roof stormwater retention. Ecological Engineering, 31(4), 225-231.
Gong, Y., Yin, D., Fang, X., & Li, J. (2018). Factors Affecting Runoff Retention Performance of Extensive Green Roofs. Water, 10(9), 1217. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/9/1217
Gong, Y., Zhang, X., Li, H., Zhang, X., He, S., & Miao, Y. (2021). A comparison of the growth status, rainfall retention and purification effects of four green roof plant species. Journal of Environmental Management, 278, 111451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111451
Kemp, S., Hadley, P., & Blanuša, T. (2019). The influence of plant type on green roof rainfall retention. Urban Ecosystems, 22(2), 355-366. doi:10.1007/s11252-018-0822-2
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006). World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated.
Liu, W., Feng, Q., Chen, W., Wei, W., & Deo, R. C. (2019). The influence of structural factors on stormwater runoff retention of extensive green roofs: new evidence from scale-based models and real experiments. Journal of Hydrology, 569, 230-238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.066
Locatelli, L., Mark, O., Mikkelsen, P. S., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Bergen Jensen, M., & Binning, P. J. (2014). Modelling of green roof hydrological performance for urban drainage applications. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 3237-3248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.030
Mentens, J., Raes, D., & Hermy, M. (2006). Green roofs as a tool for solving the rainwater runoff problem in the urbanized 21st century? Landscape and Urban Planning, 77(3), 217-226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.010
Nagase, A., & Dunnett, N. (2010). Drought tolerance in different vegetation types for extensive green roofs: Effects of watering and diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(4), 318-327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.005
Nagase, A., & Dunnett, N. (2012). Amount of water runoff from different vegetation types on extensive green roofs: Effects of plant species, diversity and plant structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(3), 356-363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.001
Qin, X., Wu, X., Chiew, Y.-M., & Li, Y. (2012). A green roof test bed for stormwater management and reduction of urban heat island effect in Singapore. British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 2(4), 410.
Stovin, V., Poë, S., De-Ville, S., & Berretta, C. (2015). The influence of substrate and vegetation configuration on green roof hydrological performance. Ecological Engineering, 85, 159-172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.076
VanWoert, N. D., Rowe, D. B., Andresen, J. A., Rugh, C. L., Fernandez, R. T., & Xiao, L. (2005). Green roof stormwater retention: effects of roof surface, slope, and media depth. Journal of environmental quality, 34(3), 1036-1044.
Zhang, S., Lin, Z., Zhang, S., & Ge, D. (2021). Stormwater retention and detention performance of green roofs with different substrates: Observational data and hydrological simulations. Journal of Environmental Management, 291, 112682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112682
Zhang, Z., Szota, C., Fletcher, T. D., Williams, N. S. G., & Farrell, C. (2019). Green roof storage capacity can be more important than evapotranspiration for retention performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 404-412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.070
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Built Environment Inquiry

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions expressed in the journal do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
