Distinctive Dimension of Hermeneutics of Religious Teaching Affecting to the Base and Its Approach to Attain the Absolute

Abstract

Religious teaching interpretation which relies on Theistic type leads to objective goal as being accepted, viewing the world as the way to final goal or ontological base, while Atheistic approach emphasizes on self-realization through epistemological base. This view was divided into 2 types, conventional and absolute knowledge. The absolute being relates with mind or consciousness as the knower, which was itself is solely absolute truth. the self-realization is the final truth-in-itself, therefor it does not need other objects to attain. The absolute realization is complete task to be united as subjectivism, while Theistic interpretation still classified the two- the created being and the creator which is the authentic source of all called God.  The second method open for beliefs and obeyances which is the passive consciousness. The two ways dealing with religious interpretation result 2 types of practical code of living; Atheistic approach focuses on self-realization as the absolute itself, but the later, Theistic interpretation opens up the middle agent as the granter or revelation of the Absolute which is another, so its attainment is an Ontological aspect.