A Study on Relation between Beliefs on Mathematical Problem Solving and Ideas on Mathematics Teaching of Pre-service Mathematics Teachers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research project was aimed to analyze the relationship between Beliefs on Mathematical Problem Solving and Ideas on Mathematics Teaching of Pre- service Mathematics Teachers. The study employed mixed method. The main data collected by a questionnaire and interviewing. The 109 from 134 of year 1-5 preservice students in mathematics, Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University, 2019 academic year were a voluntary sample group. The data was analyzed statistically by using Frequency, Percentage, Average, Standard Deviation, Independent sample t – test, and Pearson Product Moment Correlation. The qualitative data analyzed by content analysis.
The research revealed that mathematics pre-service teachers’ belief on mathematical problem solving has a relationship in the same way with idea of teaching mathematics at the significance level of .05. The result showed that mathematics pre-service teachers’ belief has related with idea of teaching mathematics strongly. Moreover, the study indicated that mathematics teacher preparation program should be nurture belief about contemporary aspects of mathematical problem solving in order to help them for changing and develop their own classroom teaching in the future.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
หากผู้เสนอบทความมีความจำเป็นเร่งด่วนในการตีพิมพ์โปรดส่งลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารฉบับอื่นแทน โดยกองบรรณาธิการจะไม่รับบทความหากผู้เสนอบทความไม่ปฏิบัติตามเงื่อนไขและขั้นตอนที่กำหนดอย่างเคร่งครัด ข้อมูลของเนื้อหาในบทความถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ Journal of Inclusive and Innovative Education คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่
References
ชนินันท์ พฤกษ์ประมูล นัฏฐิกา เจริญตะคุ และสิวะโชติ ศรีสุทธิยากร. (2563). ประสิทธิภาพของสัมประสิทธิ์สหสัมพันธ์แบบเพียร์สัน สเปียร์แมน และเคนดอลล์ เมื่อข้อมูลแจกแจงแบบไม่ปกติ. วารสารอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ทางการศึกษา, 15(2), 1-16.
Grouws, D. A. (1996). Critical Issues in Problem Solving Instruction in Mathematics. In D. Zhang, T. Sawada, and J. P. Becker (Eds.), Proceedings of the China-Japan-U.S. seminar on mathematical education (pp. 70-93). Carbondale, IL: Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University.
Hersh, R. (1986). Some proposals for revising the philosophy of mathematics. In T. TYMOCZKO (Ed.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Boston: Birkhauser.
Kayan, F. (2007). A Study on Preservice Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Mathematical Problem Solving Beliefs (Master Thesis). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
Lester, F.K. (1980). Research on mathematical problem solving. In R. J. Shumway (Ed.), Research in mathematics education. (pp. 286-323). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lesh, R. and Zawojewski, J.S. (2007). Problem Solving and Modeling. In Lester, F. K.(Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp.763-802). Charlotte: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Information Age Publishing.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Perry, B., Way, J., Southwell, B., White, A., & Pattison, J. (2005). Mathematical beliefs and achievement of pre-service primary teachers. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Research, theory and practice (Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 625-632). Sydney: MERGA.
Perry, B., Wong, N. Y., & Howard, P. (2006). Comparing primary and secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, mathematics learning and mathematics teaching in Hong Kong and Australia. In K. D. Graf, F. K. S. Leung, & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 435-448). New York: Springer.
Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve it?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. New York: National Academy Press.
Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. New York: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.). Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning. (pp.334-370). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Problem solving in the United States, 1970 – 2008: Research and theory, practice
and politics. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 537-551.
Stanic, G. and Kilpatrick, J. (1989) ‘Historical Perspective on Problem Solving in the Mathematics Curriculum’, In R. Charles and E. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 1-22), Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Takahashi, A. (2006). Characteristics of Japanese mathematics lessons. Tsukuba Journal of educational study in mathematics, 25, 37-44.
Taplin, M. (1992). An Investigation of Perseverance in Number Problem Solving. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tasmania.
