Guidelines for Curriculum Administration Focusing on Student Learning Outcomes in Lamphun Municipal Schools
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aims of this research are (1) to study the current conditions, desirable condition and need for curriculum administration focusing on student Learning outcomes in Lamphun municipal Schools. (2)to study on the curriculum administration where performs the best practice school and (3)to develop and examine the Guidelines for curriculum administration focusing on student learning outcomes in Lamphun municipal Schools. The process of this study has divided in 3 steps including were school directors or deputy directors, teachers and expert total 135 people. The research tools include questionnaires, structured interviews, meeting agendas and agendas form and checklists. The statistics used for data analysis include mean, standard deviation, frequency, Priority Need of Index, and inferential summary analysis.From the study, (1) The current state of curriculum management aimed at enhancing student learning outcomes in municipally affiliated schools in Mueang Lamphun is generally at a high level. In terms of desired conditions, the overall situation is at the highest level and the needs of the curriculum administration focusing on student Learning outcomes in Lamphun municipal schools were respectively sorted descending order of needs as follows 1) creating curriculum development 2) curriculum management operations 3) improvement and development of curriculum management processes 4) action planning for curriculum implementation 5) school preparedness 6) supervision, guidance, monitoring and evaluation and lastly, 7) summary of operational results. (2)The study on the curriculum administration where performs the best practice school has found school administrators and teachers collaborate to analyze the basic needs of students. This serves as crucial information for developing educational curricula to meet students' needs and enhance skills in each subject area. Additionally, it involves examining the educational context, emerging career trends, and opportunities for higher education. Furthermore, it considers the current and future labor market demands. (3) The outcome on drafting the curriculum administration focusing on student Learning outcomes in Lamphun municipal schools has provided the frameworks which are 1) the principal 2) the objectives 3) the operational methods 4) the conditions of success. In the same vein, the auditing result of the guideline quality showed that the accuracy suitability and possibility was in the highest level. Furthermore, these guidelines will aid in cultivating an effective process for managing the curriculum, with the goal of enhancing student learning outcomes and nurturing desired qualities in students, including being learner person, innovative co-creator, and active citizen.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
หากผู้เสนอบทความมีความจำเป็นเร่งด่วนในการตีพิมพ์โปรดส่งลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารฉบับอื่นแทน โดยกองบรรณาธิการจะไม่รับบทความหากผู้เสนอบทความไม่ปฏิบัติตามเงื่อนไขและขั้นตอนที่กำหนดอย่างเคร่งครัด ข้อมูลของเนื้อหาในบทความถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ Journal of Inclusive and Innovative Education คณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่
References
Adam, S. (2006). An introduction to learning outcomes ‘An introduction to learning outcomes: a consideration of the nature, function and position of learning outcomes in the creation of the European Higher Education Area’. In: Froment, E.; Kohler, J.; Purser, L. & Wilson, L. eds. EUA Bologna Handbook – Making Bologna Work (pp. 7-8). Berlin: Raabe Verlag.
Bharvad, A. J. (2010). Curriculum evaluation. International Research Journal, 1(12), 72-74.
Boston University. (2017). Creating Learning Outcomes. Boston: Boston Univesity.
Boon, N. S. (2020). Developing curriculum design for the 21st century–Balancing the need of character building and meeting other emerging needs of the future. Asia Pacific Journal on Curriculum Studies, 3(2), 1-10.
Chaemchoy, S. (2022). Academic Management Responsive to Change in the Disruptive Era. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Campbell-Phillips, S. (2020). Education and curriculum reform: The impact they have on learning. Budapest
International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 1074-1082.
Chaudhary, G. K. (2015). Factors affecting curriculum implementation for students. International journal of applied research, 1(12), 984-986.
Crespo, R. M., Najjar, J., Derntl, M., Leony, D., Neumann, S., Oberhuemer, P., ... & Kloos, C. D. (2010). Aligning assessment with learning outcomes in outcome-based education. In IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference (pp. 1239-1246). Spain: Madrid.
Department of Local Administration. (2022). Basic Level Educational Curriculum Management Handbook B.E.2551. Bangkok: Ministry of Interior.
Gosling, D., & Moon, J. (2002). How to use learning outcomes and assessment criteria. London: SEEC.
Hongsuwan, T., Serirat, N., Panlutan, N., Danpattanachaikul, T., & Jinjakam, C. (2022). Outcome Based Education: an evaluation from SOs to PLOs. In 2022 19th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) (pp. 1-5). Silpakorn University: Department of Computing, Faculty of Science.
James, D. (2005). Importance and impotence? Learning, outcomes and research in further education. Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 83-96.
Japee, G., & Oza, P. (2021). Curriculum and evaluation in outcome-based education. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 5620-5625.
Jdaitawi, M. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom strategy on students learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 665-680.
Kaliannan, M., & Chandran, S. D. (2012). Empowering Students through Outcome-Based Education (OBE). Research in Education. 87(1), 50-63.
Kristianto, H., Prasetyo, S., Susanti, R. F., & Adithia, M. T. (2021). Design of student and course learning outcomes measurement. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(1), 97-106.
Kuh, G. D., & Ewell, P. T. (2010). The state of learning outcomes assessment in the United States. Higher education management and policy, 22(1), 1-20.
Lile, R., & Bran, C. (2014). The assessment of learning outcomes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 163, 125-131.
Limpichamnong, C. (2021). New Generation Teachers for Competency-Based Learning Management: Essential Requirements. Bangkok: The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology.
Macalister, J., & Nation, I. P. (2019). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.
Mahajan, M., & Singh, M. K. S. (2017). Importance and benefits of learning outcomes. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(03), 65-67.
Marope, M., Griffin, P., & Gallagher, C. (2017). Future competences and the future of curriculum. United Nations Educational and Cultural Organization: International Bureau of Education.
Mendoza, W., Ramírez, G. M., González, C., & Moreira, F. (2022). Assessment of curriculum design by learning outcomes (LO). Education Sciences, 12(8), 541.
OECD. (2014). Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators.New York: OECD Publishing.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2010). Basic Level Educational Curriculum Management
Guidelines B.E.2551. Bangkok: The Acriculture Co-operative Federation of Thailand, LTD.
Office of the Education Council. (2018). National Educational Standards B.E.2561. Bangkok: Office of the Education Standards and Learning Development.
Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. Journal of effective teaching, 15(1), 20-33.
Pratoolee Municipal School. (2022). Self-Assessment Report 2022 (SAR). Lamphun: Pratu Lee Municipal School.
Premalatha, K. (2019). Course and program outcomes assessment methods in outcome-based education: A review. Journal of Education, 199(3), 111-127.
Proitz, T. S. (2015). Learning outcomes as a key concept in policy documents throughout policy changes. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(3), 275-296.
Rawlley, A., & Mehra, C. (2020). Challenges in implementation and assessment of outcome-based education and curriculum: global perspective. Journal Of Engineering, Science & Management Education, 13(1), 17-23.
Sash. (2022). Learning Objectives or Learning Outcomes. Retrieved from
https://elearningindustry.com/learning-objectives-or-learning-outcomes.
Saylor, Galen J., Alexander, William, M., & Lewis, Arthur, J. (1981). Curriculum Planning for better Teaching and Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Shaheen, S. (2019). Theoretical perspectives and current challenges of OBE framework. International Journal of Engineering Education, 1(2), 122-129.
Soto, S. T. (2015). An analysis of curriculum development. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 5(6), 1129.
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. Arlington, VA: The American Association of School Administrators.
Srisuk, K. (2009). Research Methodology. Chiang Mai: Krung Chang Printing.
Taguma, M., & Barrera, M. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: Curriculum analysis. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Tenedero, E. Q., & Pacadaljen, L. M. (2021). Learning experiences in the emerging outcomes-based education (OBE) curriculum of higher education institutions (HEI’S) on the scope of Hammond’s evaluation cube. Psychology And Education, 9(58), 2.
Tangkunanan, P. (2019). Academic Administration in Educational Institutions for Sustainable Development(2nd ed.). Min Service Supply Co., Ltd.
Yanawongsa, W. et al. (2021). Outcome-Based Curriculum: New approach for Higher Education Curriculum. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, 15(2), 279-291. [in Thai]
