Assessing the Construct Validity of Lifelong Learning Measurement Model among Undergraduate Students at Chiang Mai University Using Confirmatory Composite Analysis

Main Article Content

Yingrong Guo
Suntonrapot Damrongpanit

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop and validate a measurement model of lifelong learning among 417 undergraduate students from 21 faculties, obtained through stratified random sampling. The instrument used was a 5-point rating scale questionnaire with 53 items. The discrimination values ranged from 0.341 to 0.782, with a reliability of 0.962. The data were analyzed using a formative-formative disjoint two-stage approach of confirmatory composite analysis (CCA). The results showed that the measurement model of lifelong learning among undergraduate students at Chiang Mai University consisted of 4 components and 17 indicators: 1) learning habits, with 4 indicators and indicator weights ranging from 0.102 to 0.475; 2) interest in diverse learning content, with 4 indicators and indicator weights ranging from 0.216 to 0.445; 3) ability to learn from diverse learning resources, with 4 indicators and indicator weights ranging from 0.278 to 0.394; and 4) self-reliance, with 5 indicators and indicator weights ranging from 0.103 to 0.406. The measurement model of lifelong learning demonstrated construct validity, as evidenced by the model fit statistics: SRMR=0.0409, dULS=0.2564, and dG=0.1350, indicating that the model fit well with the empirical data.

Article Details

How to Cite
Guo, Y., & Damrongpanit, S. . (2024). Assessing the Construct Validity of Lifelong Learning Measurement Model among Undergraduate Students at Chiang Mai University Using Confirmatory Composite Analysis. Journal of Inclusive and Innovative Education, 8(3), 1–15. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmujedu/article/view/274242
Section
Research Article

References

Asgari, A., Fard, H., & Tirgoo, F. (2019). The role of quality in higher education and lifelong learning in entrepreneurship competencies of undergraduate students. Pedagogika, 135(3), 240-256.

Ainscough, L., Stewart, E. A., Colthorpe, K., & Zimbardi, K. (2018). Learning hindrances and self-regulated learning strategies reported by undergraduate students: identifying characteristics of resilient students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2194-2209.

Anu, S. (2006). A reciprocal relationship between self-directed learning and lifelong learning in undergraduate students (Master of arts thesis). Faculty of Education. Srinakharinwirot University. [in Thai]

Biesta, G. (2006). What's the point of lifelong learning if lifelong learning has no point? on the democratic deficit of policies for lifelong learning. European Educational Research Journal, 5(3-4), 169-180.

Boyadjieva, P. and Ilieva-Trichkova, P. (2017). Between inclusion and fairness. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(2), 97-117.

Charungkaittikul, S., Ratana-Ubol, A., & Henschke, J. (2019). Strategies to reorienting higher education institutions toward lifelong learning higher education institutions in Thailand. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 10(2), 1-15.

Chinokul, C. (2019). Developing lifelong learning skills of undergraduate students in the digital age. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 21(3), 335-348. [in Thai]

Christopher, K. K. and Arthur, J. C. (2003). Lifelong Learning in Higher Education (Third Edition). Herndon, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. France: UNESCO Publishing.

Dirin, A., Laine, T., & Nieminen, M. (2020). Facets of mobile lifelong learning services. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education(CSEDU), 1, 543-551.

Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2013). What was your best learning experience? Our story about using stories to solve instructional problems. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(2), 269-274.

Erdoğan, D. and Arsal, Z. (2016). The development of lifelong learning trends scale (LLLTS). Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6(1), 114-122.

Hair, J. F. Ringle, C. M..& Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2017). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Hongkong: Cengage Learning.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). New York: Sage Publications.

Hällsten, M. (2010). Late entry in swedish tertiary education: can the opportunity of lifelong learning promote equality over the life course?. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(3), 537-559.

Therawut, C., & Jiraporn, S. (2021). The relationship between lifelong learning skills and work success of Rajabhat University graduates. Academic Journal of Phuket Rajabhat University, 17(1), 195-210. [in Thai]

Jõgi, L. (2012). Understanding lifelong learning and adult education policy in estonia: tendencies and contradictions. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 18(2), 44-60.

Kirby, J., Knapper, C., Lamon, P., & Egnatoff, W. (2010). Development of a scale to measure lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29(3), 291-302.

Klunklin, A., Viseskul, N., Sripusanapan, A., & Turale, S. (2010). Readiness for self-directed learning among nursing students in Thailand. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12(2), 177-181.

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Chicago, IL: Follett Publishing Company.

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.

Lohsoonthorn, V., Khidir, H., Casillas, G., Lertmaharit, S., Tadesse, M., Pensuksan, W., Rattananupong, T. & Williams, M. (2012). Sleep quality and sleep patterns in relation to consumption of energy drinks, caffeinated beverages, and other stimulants among thai college students. Sleep and Breathing, 17(3), 1017-1028.

Luka, I., & Sungsri, S. (2015). Lifelong learning strategies and practice in Latvia and Thailand. Policy Futures in Education, 13(4), 529-545.

Moto, S. (2018). The importance of ICT literacy in the IMTS model among Thai junior high school students. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 78-89.

Mounier, A., & Tangchuang, P. (Eds.). (2010). Education and knowledge in Thailand: The quality controversy. Bangkok: Silkworm Books.

Nguyen, P., Nguyen, Q., Nguyen, L., & Huynh, V. (2022). Factors affecting vietnamese higher education quality in the context of industry 4.0. Vietnam Journal of Education, 6(3), 225-237.

Prabjandee, D., & Inthachot, M. (2013). Self-directed Learning Readiness of College Students in Thailand. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 2(1), 1-11.

Prachanban, N. (2015). The Development of Self-directed Learning Indicators of Undergraduate Students. Social Sciences Research and Academic Journal, 11(1), 301-311. [in Thai]

Puengcharoenpong, N., Sukhwan, C., & Kaewpijit, J. (2018). Factors affecting the work success of accounting graduates from Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University. Graduate Studies Journal, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, 15(70), 195-206. [in Thai]

Ratana-Ubol, A., & Henschke, J. (2016). Cultural learning processes through local wisdom: A case study on adult and lifelong learning in Thailand. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 6(2), 41-60.

Samruayruen, B., Enriquez, J., Natakuatoong, O., & Samruayruen, K. (2013). Self-regulated learning: A key of a successful learner in online learning environments in Thailand. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 45-69.

Schuberth, F., Henseler, J., & Dijkstra, T. K. (2018). Confirmatory composite analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2541.

Sivaci, S., Kılınç, M., KÖROĞLU, M., & Demirel, E. (2023). Investigation of life long learning tendencies of undergraduate students in turkey. Journal of Educational Issues, 9(1), 143-160.

Singporn, P. (2019). Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing Among Thai ICT Undergraduate Students. Computer Science, Education, 17(1), 34-45. [in Thai]

Smith, J., & Spurling, A. (1999). Lifelong learning: Riding the tiger. London: Cassell.

Soper, D.S. (2023). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. Retrieved from https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th Ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Tekkol, I. A., & Demirel, M. (2018). An Investigation of Self-DirectedLearning Skills of Undergraduate Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–14.

Techataweewan, W., & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 215-221.

Thima, N., Lorsuwannakul, V., & Intrakamhaeng, T. (2019). Factors affecting the career success of graduates from the Faculty of Education, Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University. Valaya Alongkorn Review (Humanities and Social Science), 14(2), 183-194. [in Thai]

Thwe, W. and Kálmán, A. (2023). Lifelong learning in the educational setting: a systematic literature review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(2), 407-417.

Treiman, D. J. (2014). Quantitative data analysis: Doing social research to test ideas. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

UNESCO. (2015). Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/education-2030-incheon-framework-for-action-implementation-of-sdg4-2016-en_2.pdf.