Developing Students’ Thinking and Essential Skills in an Innovative Mathematics Classroom through Pre-Service Teachers’ Use of a Translated Japanese Mathematics Textbook for Designing Problem Situations

Main Article Content

Ariya Suriyon

Abstract

Mathematics learning plays a crucial role in fostering students’ higher-order thinking skills, while textbooks serve as fundamental tools for teachers in planning instruction. This study aimed to investigate the development of students’ thinking skills—problem solving, analytical thinking, creativity, and innovation—as well as essential skills, including communication and collaboration. Pre-service teachers used a translated Japanese mathematics textbook as a tool to design problem situations. A qualitative research methodology was employed, focusing on classroom practice based on the Transformative Lesson Study Incorporating Open Approach (TLSOA) framework (Inprasitha, 2011; 2022). The development of students’ thinking and essential skills in this study involved transforming classroom contexts, including teacher professional culture, textbook use, and teaching approaches, through the TLSOA process. The research participants consisted of six Lesson Study teams (Grades 1–6), each including one mentor teacher and two pre-service teachers, totaling 18 participants, along with one researcher. The target group comprised 120 students from four partner schools in teacher education implementing TLSOA. Research instruments included 18 lesson plans (three lessons per grade), classroom observation records, activity sheets, video recordings, and photographs. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The findings revealed that Lesson Study teams collaboratively transformed classroom practices through weekly TLSOA cycles. During the collaborative plan, the translated Japanese textbook was used to design problem situations and instructional materials, emphasizing textbook goals and real-life contexts relevant to students. In collaboratively do, teachers employed the Open Approach, encouraging independent thinking and valuing diverse student ideas. And collaboratively see, teams used observational data to identify and enhance students’ thinking and essential skills. These changes in classroom context led to a continuous cycle of skill development grounded in students’ natural thinking processes, with observable evidence of both thinking and essential skills emerging within the TLSOA context.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suriyon, A. (2026). Developing Students’ Thinking and Essential Skills in an Innovative Mathematics Classroom through Pre-Service Teachers’ Use of a Translated Japanese Mathematics Textbook for Designing Problem Situations. Journal of Inclusive and Innovative Education, 10(1), 155–179. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmujedu/article/view/284518
Section
Research Article

References

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Chaiwan, S. (2017). Learning Management from Activities in Japanese Mathematics Book to Promote Analytical Thinking skills of Prathomsuksa 6 Students by Open Approach Method. JSN Journal, Special Edition 2017, 38–54. [in Thai]

Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H.-Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning,

(2), 117–151.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1-23.

Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633–646.

Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CD-β Press.

Inprasitha, M. (2011a). One Feature of adaptive lesson study in Thailand: designing a learning unit. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 34(1), 47-66.

Inprasitha, M. (2011b). Mathematics for primary education: Grade 2, Book 1 (2nd ed.). Khon Kaen: Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Inprasitha, M. (2016). Classroom innovation and the Open Approach to enhance classroom quality and conduct “Kyozaikenkyu” in lesson study and the Open Approach [Slides]. Khon Kaen, Thailand: Center for Research in Mathematics Education. [in Thai]

Inprasitha, M. (2018). Mathematics for primary education: Grade 3, Book 1 (2nd ed.). Khon Kaen: Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Inprasitha, M. (2019a). 15 years of the Center for Research in Mathematics Education: Research and development of innovations for laying the foundation of national development. Khon Kaen, Thailand: Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Inprasitha, M. (2019b). Mathematics for primary education: Grade 1 (2nd ed.). Khon Kaen: Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Inprasitha, M. (2019c). Mathematics for primary education: Grade 4, Book 1 (2nd ed.). Khon Kaen: Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Inprasitha, M. (2019d). Mathematics for primary education: Grade 5, Book 1 (2nd ed.). Khon Kaen: Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Inprasitha, M. (2021). Mathematics for primary education: Grade 6, Book 1 (2nd ed.). Khon Kaen: Center for Research in Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Inprasitha, M. (2022). Lesson study and open approach development in Thailand: A longitudinal study. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 11(5), 1–15.

Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2023). Press release on the results of PISA 2022 assessment. Bangkok: Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology.

Isoda, M., & Katagiri, S. (2012). Mathematical Thinking: How to Develop It in the Classroom. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In A. Gagatsis & S. Papastavridis (Eds.), 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 115–124). Athens, Hellenic Republic.

Office of the National Education Commission. (1999). National Education Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and Amendments (Second National Education Act B.E. 2545 [2002]). Bangkok, Thailand: Office of the National Education Commission.

Retrieved from https://bic.moe.go.th/images/stories/5Porobor._2542pdf.pdf [in Thai]

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from

http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources.

Plianram, S. and Inprasitha, M. (2012) Exploring Elementary Thai Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Textbook. Creative Education, 3, 692-695.

Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.

Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525–559.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.

Shimizu, Y. (2009). Characteristics of Japanese mathematics lessons. In Cai, J., et al. (Eds.), Approaches to Studying the Enacted Mathematics Curriculum (pp. 69–88). New York: Springer.

Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Gweenwich, CT: Information Age.

Watanabe, T. (2002). Content and organization of Japanese elementary mathematics textbooks: An analysis of fractions. School Science and Mathematics, 102(1), 32–42.

World Economic Forum. (2016). New Vision for Education: Fostering Social and Emotional Learning through Technology. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_New_Vision_for_Education.pdf

World Economic Forum. (2021). 10 essential skills the World Economic Forum emphasizes workers should have by 2025. Retrieved from

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/10/top-10-work-skills-of-tomorrow-how-long-it-takes-to-learn-them/