Classification of Upper Secondary School Students Based on Motivation in Mathematics Learning: Factor Analysis and Latent Profile Analysis

Main Article Content

Piyanat Kantha
Nampueng Intanate
Nonthakan Kantha

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the factor structure of mathematics learning motivation among upper secondary school students and to classify students based on their mathematics learning motivation profiles using Latent Profile Analysis. The sample was divided into two phases: Phase 1 consisted of 367 students for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Phase 2 consisted of 1,085 students for Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), both obtained through multi-stage random sampling from Grade 10 – 12 students in schools under               the Secondary Educational Service Area Office during the first semester of the 2025 academic year.             The research instrument was a 26-item mathematics learning motivation scale with a 5-point rating scale, which was validated with IOC values ranging from 0.60 to 1.00 and a reliability coefficient () of 0.933.       The findings revealed that (1) The factor structure of mathematics learning motivation comprised three factors: Self-Confidence, Engagement, and Mathematics Anxiety, which together accounted for 59.75%          of the total variance, and (2) the Latent Profile Analysis indicated that the five-profile model provided         the best fit to the data (Ek = 0.822, AIC = 7155.65, BIC = 7280.39), consisting of the Passive Learners group (2.49%), the Diligent Learners group (58.71%), the Anxious Learners group (17.42%), the Confident and Positive Learners group (16.96%), and the Anxiety-Driven Learners group (4.42%). Furthermore, gender, grade level, and academic track were found to be significantly associated with motivation profiles (p < .001).

Article Details

How to Cite
Kantha, P., Intanate, N., & Kantha, N. (2026). Classification of Upper Secondary School Students Based on Motivation in Mathematics Learning: Factor Analysis and Latent Profile Analysis. Journal of Inclusive and Innovative Education, 10(2), 22–38. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmujedu/article/view/286518
Section
Research Article

References

Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185.

Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 243–248.

Caviola, S., Toffalini, E., Giofrè, D., Mercader Ruiz, J., Szucs, D., & Mammarella, I. C. (2022). Math performance and academic anxiety forms, from sociodemographic to cognitive aspects: A meta-analysis on 906,311 participants. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 363–399.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Federici, R. A., Skaalvik, E. M., & Tangen, T. N. (2015). Students' perceptions of the goal structure in mathematics classrooms: Relations with goal orientations, mathematics anxiety, and help-seeking behavior. International Education Studies, 8(3), 146–158.

Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326.

Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46.

Kanjanawasee, S. (2013). Classical Test Theory (7th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]

Lubke, G. H., & Neale, M. C. (2006). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(4), 499–532.

Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311–322.

Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47.

Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents' math anxiety on children's math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1480–1488.

Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. K. (2022). The murky distinction between self-confidence and self-efficacy: Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 331–353.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2020). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Virginia: NCTM.

National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). (2025). Ordinary National Educational Test (O-NET) result report for academic year 2024. Bangkok: National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). https://www.niets.or.th [in Thai]

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2025). Number of student and classroom by gender and grad level academic year 2025. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission. [in Thai]

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341.

Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 187–202.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860.

Viljaranta, J., Aunola, K., & Hirvonen, R. (2016). Motivation and academic performance among first-graders: A person-oriented approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 366–372.

Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2021). How to perform three-step latent class analysis in the presence of measurement non-invariance or differential item functioning. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 356-364

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). 35 Years of research on students’ subjective task values and motivation: A look back and a look Forward. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 7, pp. 162-193). New York: Elsevier.

Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 210–216.