When Were the Rules in the Pāṭimokkha Established?
Main Article Content
Abstract
Many modern scholars in both the East and West share the view that most of the content in the Vinayatipiṭaka, the book of monastic discipline, was gradually established and developed after the time of the Lord Buddha. This claim is based on a comparative study of the different Vinayatipiṭaka belonging to six Buddhist sects, and which have been handed down until today: it is pointed out that, if the Buddha was the one who established all monastic rules (sikkhāpada), those rules of all Buddhist sects should have been consistent, whereas a number of those rules for monks in the mainpart, the so called Pāṭimokkha, are different.
However, according to my close study, I found that the Lord Buddha was the one who established the monastic rules in the Pāṭimokkha (which is divided into eight groups according to the seriousness of the offence).
Furthermore, he also gave permission to the saṅgha, the Buddhist order, to amend those rules in the seventh group, the so called Sekhiya, as they are considered to be minor with the lightest offences. As a result, a number of the rules in this group have become considerably different among Buddhist sects, despite the similar sub-categorization of this group. All rules among Buddhist sects would become consistent, if only the rules in the Sekhiya group and another two rules in the Pācittiya group were excluded.
Unlike the Sutta, once any rule of the Pāṭimokkha has been set down, it will affect the daily life of all monks. If any monk breaks it, he must admit for his offence. Therefore, it is hard to image that there would
be anyone, except the Lord Buddha, capable of establishing a new rule and then all monks in the whole saṅgha would accept it. On top of that, the Lord Buddha also set particular rules for the saṅgha to hold a fortnight assembly to orally repeat and review the Pāṭimokkha, which meant the content of the Pāṭimokkha was well preserved and handed down properly. This is the reason for the agreement of the main content of the Pāṭimokkha in the Vinayatipiṭaka of all sects.
Focusing on the inconsistency of a number of rules of the Pāṭimokkha among different sects, scholars form the view that the monastic rules had gradually come into existence after the time of the Lord Buddha. But this
view arises by not excluding the rules of the Sekhiya group from the other groups, and then not realizing the relationship between the Sekhiya group and the issue of minor rules (mentioned in the record of the first Buddhist council).
Article Details
ลิขสิทธิ์ สำนักการศึกษา วัดพระธรรมกาย
References
Vinayapiṭaka vol.I. 1997. edited by Hermann Oldenberg. Oxford: PTS. (first printed. 1879. London: Williams and Norgate)
Vinayapiṭaka vol.II. 1995. edited by Hermann Oldenberg. Oxford: PTS. (first printed. 1880)
Vinayapiṭaka vol.III. 2005. edited by Hermann Oldenberg. Lancaster: PTS. (first printed. 1881)
Vinayapiṭaka vol.IV. 2001. edited by Hermann Oldenberg. Oxford: PTS. (first printed. 1882)
Dīghanikāya vol.I-II. 1995. edited by T.W.Rhys Davids and J.E.Carpenter. London: PTS. (first printed. 1889-1903) Dīghanikāya vol.III. 1992. edited by J.E.Carpenter. London: PTS. (first printed. 1911)
Aṅguttaranikāya vol.I. 1989. edited by R.Morris. revised by A.K.Warder. London: PTS. (first printed. 1885)
Mahāvaṃsa. 2007. edited by Wilhelm Geiger. Lancaster: PTS. (first printed. 1908)
Milindapañho. 1997. edited by V.Trenckner. Oxford: PTS. (first printed. 1880. London: Williams and Norgate)
Taishō-shinshū-daizōkyō 大正新脩大蔵経 (พระไตรปิฎกจีน ฉบับไทโชชินชูไดโซเคียว). 1924-1934. Tokyo: Daizōshuppansha.
HARA, M. 1995. “Review of von Hinüber (1989).” Indo-Iranian Journal 38: 71-76.
HIRAKAWA, Akira (平川彰). 1999. Ritsuzō-no-kenkyū vol.1 Hirakawa-Akira-chosakushū #9 律蔵の研究 I
・平川彰著作集 #9 (งานวิจัยพระวินัยปิฎก เล่ม 1 – รวมผลงานเขียนของฮิรากาวะ ลำดับที่ 9). Tokyo: Shunjūsha
HIRAKAWA, Akira (平川彰). 2000. Ritsuzō-no-kenkyū vol.2 Hirakawa-Akira-chosakushū #10 律蔵の研究 II・平川彰著作集 #10 (งานวิจัยพระวินัยปิฎก เล่ม 2 – รวมผลงานเขียนของฮิรากาวะ ลำดับที่ 10). Tokyo: Shunjūsha.
MAYEDA, Egaku (前田恵学). 1964. Genshi-bukkyō-seiten-no-seiritsu-shi-kenkyū 原始仏教聖典の成立史研究 (งานวิจัยประวัติการกำเนิดคัมภีร์พระไตรปิฎกยุคดั้งเดิม). Tokyo: Sankibō busshorin.
MIZUNO, Kogen et al. (水野弘元他). 1977. Butten-kaidai-jiten 仏典解題事典 (สารานุกรมคัมภีร์พระพุทธศาสนา). 2nd ed. Tokyo: Shunjūsha.
PACHOW, W. 1955. A Comparative Study of the Prātimokṣa. Santiniketan
SATO, Mitsuo (佐藤密雄). 1963. Genshi-bukkyō-kyōdan-no-kenkyū 原始仏教教団の研究. (งานวิจัยคณะสงฆ์
ในพระพุทธศาสนายุคดั้งเดิม). Tokyo: Sankibōbusshorin.
TSUKAMOTO, Keishō (塚本啓祥). 1980. Shoki-bukkyō-kyōdanshi-no-kenkyū 初期仏教教団史の研究 (งานวิจัยประวัติศาสตร์คณะสงฆ์ในพระพุทธศาสนายุคต้น). 2nd ed. Kyoto: Heirakujishōten.
WATSUJI, Tetsuro (和辻哲郎). 1970. Genshi-bukkyō-no-jissen-tetsugaku 原始仏教の実践哲学 (ปรัชญาการปฏิบัติของพระพุทธศาสนายุคดั้งเดิม). Tokyo: Iwanamishoten. (original version. 1927).
พระธรรมปิฎก (ป.อ.ปยุตฺโต). 2541. พุทธธรรม. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 7.