The Development of Evaluation Model for Student Competency of Professional Skills of the Vocational Certificate Curriculum in Fine Arts, Bunditpatanasilpa Institute
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to 1) study the factors for Competency Appraisal of professional skills of the Vocational Certificate Curriculum in Fine Arts, 2) develop the Evaluation Model for Competency Appraisal of professional skills of the Vocational Certificate Curriculum in Fine Arts, and 3) try and evaluate the results of the operations according to the evaluation Model for Competency Appraisal of professional skills of the Vocational Certificate Curriculum in Fine Arts with a participatory action research. The sample groups were categorized into 3 phases; phase 1 included administrators, government teachers and educational personnel, totaling 99 people selected by purposive sampling, phase 2 included 7 experts selected by purposive sampling, and phase 3, 25 teachers who participated in the study. .There are four types of materials developed in this study included 1) a focus group discussion, 2) a questionnaire about the components of learner competency in professional skills 3) an assessment of the appropriateness of the components indicators for evaluating student Competency Appraisal of professional skills of the Vocational Certificate Curriculum in Fine Arts, and 4) a quality assessment form for assessing student Competency Appraisal of professional skills of the Vocational Certificate Curriculum in Fine Arts .The statistics used for data analysis included average, standard deviation, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and content analysis
The research findings revealed the following: firstly, the study on the components of learners' professional skills competencies in the Fine Arts curriculum at the vocational certificate level from Bunditpatanasilpa Institute identified key components and indicators. Based on expert opinions, the learners' professional skills competencies in the Fine Arts vocational certificate curriculum consist of 4 components and 7 indicators as follows: factor 1: knowledge with 2 indicators, factor 2: skills with 2 indicators, factor 3: application ability with 2 indicators and, factor 4 artistic work with 1 indicator. The results of the structural validity check for the component indicators showed that the model aligned well with the empirical data. The weights of all four components were positive and statistically significant at the .01 level, ranging from 0.94 to 1.00. Similarly, the weights of the seven indicators were positive and statistically significant at the .01 level, ranging from 0.40 to 1.00. This demonstrates that the confirmatory component model has structural validity. Secondly, the results of competency appraisal of professional skills of the Vocational Certificate Curriculum in Fine Arts examining suitability and feasibility by experts, the accuracy standards was at the highest level ( = 4.64, S.D =0.34) and the feasibility standards was at the highest level (
= 4.71, S.D = 0.41). And thirdly, the results of try out and evaluate found that the results of operations according to Evaluation Model for Competency of professional skills of the Vocational Certificate Curriculum in Fine Arts with a participatory action research in term of accuracy (
= 4.60, S.D =0.57) ,feasibility (
= 4.54, S.D =0.56) was at a high level, utility (
= 4.46, S.D =0.49) was at a high level, and propriety (
= 4.39, S.D =0.65) was at a high level.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความ ข้อความ ภาพประกอบ ตารางประกอบ ที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารเป็นความคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนแต่เพียงผู้เดียว ไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราชแต่อย่างใด
บทความที่เสนอพิจารณาในวารสาร e-JODIL ต้องเป็นบทความที่ไม่เคยส่งไปลงพิมพ์ เผยแพร่ หรืออยู่ระหว่างการพิจารณาของวารสารอื่น
กองบรรณาธิการขอสงวนสิทธิ์ในการพิจารณาและตัดสินการตีพิมพ์บทความในวารสาร
References
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons.
Bunditpatanasilpa Institute. (2017). Vocational Diploma Fine Arts Curriculum (revised) 2017. Nakhon Pathom: College of Fine Arts.
Buosonte, R. (2020). Research and Development of Educational Innovations (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Chalarak, P. (2006). Participatory Action Research. Journal of Western Rajabhat Universities, 1(1), 17-23.
Chaiyapak, P. (2022). Development of an Evaluation Model of Teacher Competency Based on The King’s Philosophy for Student Teacher of Rajabhat University: Applying The Theory – Based Evaluation Approach (Doctoral Dissertation). Educational Research and Evaluation, Naresuan University. Phitsanulok.
Heemadam, F., & Buosonte, R. (2021). The Creative Designing of Learning Measurement Innovation. Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Journal, 15(1), 15-26.
Hox, J.J. (2010). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Janhom, P. (2020). Competency Development in Art Learning Management of School Art Education Teachers That Develops The 21st Century Learner Skills Through Online Training. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 9(5), 446-461.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2012). LISREL 9.1: LISREL Syntax Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kanjanawasee, S. (2019). Evaluation Theory (9th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling; A Researcher’s Guide. CA: Sage Publications.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Balla, J.R, & Grayson, D. (1998). Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Multivariate Behav Res, 33(2), 181-220.
Office of the Secretariat of the Education Council. (2021) Guidelines for Developing Student Competencies at the Basic Education Level. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission.
Prachanban, P. (2018). Techniques for Analyzing and Applying Structural Equation Models for Research and Evaluation. Phitsanulok: AT Graphic Center.
Ramsut, P. (1997). Participatory Action Research. Bangkok: ASEAN Institute for Health Development, Mahidol University.
Sawat, R. (2022). The Development of Factors, Indicators and Criteria for Educational Internal Quality Assurance at Fundamental Education in Multicultural Society the Southern Border Province (Doctoral Dissertation). Innovation of Learning Measurement, Naresuan University. Phitsanulok.
Sereerat, B. (2022). Teachers and Learners’ Competencies Development. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 1-11.
Tacq, J. (1997). Multivariate Analysis Techniques in Social Science Research from Problem to Analysis. London: Sage.
Topitak, K. (2020). Performance Assessment: Concept to Practice. Phitsanulok: Naresuan University Publishing House.
Wiratchai, N. (1999). LISREL Model: Statistical Analysis for Research (3rd ed). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
