Educational Technology Office Model in the Digital Transformation Age for Higher Education Institutions in Thailand

Authors

  • yongyut khunsang Faculty of Education, Ramkhamhaeng University
  • Yotravee Waythongkhum Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, Ramkhamhaeng
  • Jintavee Khlaisang Department of Educational Technology and Communications, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Educational Technology Office, Digital Transformation Age, Higher Education Institutions

Abstract

This research aimed to: 1) study the operational needs of the Educational Technology Office in the digital transformation age for higher education institutions in Thailand, 2) study the components of the operational structure and organizational management of the Educational Technology Office in the digital transformation age for higher education institutions in Thailand, 3) develop a model, and 4) evaluate the model. The study population consisted of three groups: a group of operators and department heads to study operational needs, a group of experts to assess model suitability, and a group of qualified professionals to evaluate the model. The research instruments used were a needs assessment questionnaire, interview form, suitability assessment form, and model assessment form.

The research results found that: 1) The operational needs of the Educational Technology Office in the digital transformation age for higher education institutions in Thailand, in terms of operational structure, consisted of 15 elements and 50 variables, and in terms of organizational management, there were 11 elements and 35 variables, with all variables consistent with the specified criteria (CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000, SRMR = 0.000). 2) Components of the Educational Technology Office in the digital transformation age for higher education institutions in Thailand: in terms of operational structure, there were 15 components and 77 variables, and in terms of organizational management, there were 11 components and 56 variables. 3) The results of the model development of the Educational Technology Office in the digital transformation age for higher education institutions in Thailand showed high appropriateness overall (M = 4.41, SD = 0.77). 4) The evaluation results of the model indicated the highest level of appropriateness overall (M = 4.51, SD = 0.59).

References

ชัยยงค์ พรหมวงศ์. (2556). การทดสอบประสิทธิภาพสื่อหรือชุดการสอน. วารสารศิลปากรศึกษาศาสตร์, 5(1), 7-20. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/suedureasearchjournal/article/view/28419

ณัฏฐ์ ดิษเจริญ. (2557). การพัฒนาสื่อการเรียนรู้เรื่องโครงสร้างอะตอมและพันธะเคมีด้วยเทคโนโลยีออกเมนเต็ดเรียลลิตี้. วารสารหน่วยวิจัยวิทยาศาสตร์เทคโนโลยีและสิ่งแวดล้อมเพื่อการเรียนรู้ มหาวิทยาลัยอุบลราชธานี, 5(1), 21-27. https://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/JSTEL/article/view/4255

สุมาลี สังข์ศรี. (2545). การศึกษาทางไกลเพื่อส่งเสริมการศึกษาตลอดชีวิตแก่ผู้อยู่นอกระบบโรงเรียน. ใน ประมวลบทความการเรียนการสอนตามแนวปฏิรูปการเรียนรู้. มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช.

Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development model. ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED477517

JISC. (2015a). Definitions: Technology enhanced learning environments areas. http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140615133315/

Revans, R. (1997). Action learning: Its origin and nature. In M. Pedler (Ed.), Action learning in practice. Gower.

Rouse, M. (2011). Virtual learning environment (VLE) or managed learning environment (MLE). http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/virtual-learning-environment-VLE-or-managed-learning-environmentMLE

Downloads

Published

2025-07-25

How to Cite

khunsang, yongyut, Waythongkhum, Y. ., & Khlaisang, J. (2025). Educational Technology Office Model in the Digital Transformation Age for Higher Education Institutions in Thailand. ECT Education and Communication Technology Journal, 20(29), 122–136. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ectstou/article/view/275371