Navigating Toward the Next Digital Era: Future Directions for Digital Citizenship Skills Development in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Keywords:
digital citizenship, artificial intelligence, skills development, ai literacy, tripartite governanceAbstract
This academic article examines the future directions for developing digital citizenship skills in the age of artificial intelligence (AI). The rapid transformation of AI technology since late 2022 has created a competency gap between existing digital citizenship frameworks and contemporary real-world requirements. This study analyzes the limitations of pre-AI frameworks, such as the ISTE Standards (2016) and the Council of Europe Framework (2019), which primarily address Web 2.0 challenges but fail to adequately cover emerging AI-era obstacles, including algorithmic bias, deepfakes, automated decision-making systems, and the digital divide. A comparative analysis of strategies from Thailand, Singapore, Finland, South Korea, and Canada reveals distinct emphases reflecting their respective economic and social contexts: Thailand employs a hybrid approach under the Digital Thailand framework; Singapore focuses on lifelong learning through "Digital Skills for Life"; Finland integrates multiliteracy as a transversal competence; while South Korea and Canada emphasize economic competitiveness and democratic values, respectively. The article proposes a new framework consisting of three core competencies: 1) AI Literacy—the ability to understand AI operating principles and their societal impacts; 2) Algorithmic Critical Thinking—the skills to evaluate and interrogate automated decision-making; and 3) Data Ethics Consciousness—an awareness of the ethical implications regarding data use and sharing. Regarding policy development, a tripartite governance model is proposed through collaboration among the government (as a regulator and supporter of independent research), the private sector (developing socially responsible technology), and civil society. Finally, the study suggests curriculum reform through active learning approaches, such as Inquiry-based Learning and Phenomenon-based Learning, to cultivate digital citizens prepared for the complexities of the forthcoming digital era.
References
กระทรวงดิจิทัลเพื่อเศรษฐกิจและสังคม. (2559). แผนพัฒนาดิจิทัลเพื่อเศรษฐกิจและสังคม. https://cio.mhesi.go.th/sites/default/files/document_download_file/1467115019.pdf
สำนักงานบริหารและพัฒนาองค์ความรู้. (2566). กรอบทักษะความเป็นพลเมืองดิจิทัล 8 ประการ. สำนักงานบริหารและพัฒนาองค์ความรู้.
สำนักงานพัฒนารัฐบาลดิจิทัล (องค์การมหาชน). (2566). แผนพัฒนารัฐบาลดิจิทัลของประเทศไทย พ.ศ. 2566–2570. https://www.dga.or.th/document/119414/
Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2024). Educational AI: Past, present and future. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(2), 45–67.
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 77–91.
Canada Digital Charter. (2024). Strengthening privacy for the digital age. Government of Canada. https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/062.nsf/eng/h_00108.html
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107, 1753–1820. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/640
Council of Europe. (2022). Digital citizenship education handbook: Being online, well-being online, rights online (2022 ed.). Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/1680a49333
Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2024). Digital rights and algorithmic accountability: Protecting civil liberties in the digital age. https://www.eff.org/issues/algorithmic-transparency
Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA). (2022). ETDA 12 years: Live the good life with digital technology. https://www.etda.or.th/en/pr-news/ETDA66-1.aspx
Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA). (2024a). ETDA Digital Citizen (EDC). https://www.etda.or.th/th/Our-Service/edc/e-Learning.aspx
Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA). (2024b). IFBL: Internet for Better Life. https://www.etda.or.th/th/KnowledgeSharing/IFBL.aspx
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2023). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33, 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA). (2024). New Digital Skills for Life framework to strengthen digital literacy of Singaporeans [Factsheet]. https://www.imda.gov.sg/resources/press-releases-factsheets-and-speeches/factsheets/2024/new-digital-skills-for-life-framework
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). National educational technology standards for students (2nd ed.). https://www.westasd.org/Downloads/nets%202007%20and%20permissions.pdf
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2016). ISTE standards for students. ISTE.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2017). ISTE standards for students eBook. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/das/ctedtech/publications/2018/iste_student_standards_ebook.pdf
Kietzmann, J., Mills, A. J., & Plangger, K. (2024). Deepfakes: Trick or treat? Business Horizons, 67(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006
Kivinen, K. (2023). In Finland, we make each schoolchild a scientist. Issues in Science and Technology, 39(3), 41–42. https://issues.org/finland-education-misinformation-social-resilience-kivinen/
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2004). Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. MIT Press.
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2023). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
Palsa, L., & Mertala, P. (2019). Contextualising the concept of multiliteracy in the Finnish local curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 177–191.
Republic of Korea Ministry of Science and ICT. (2022). Comprehensive Plan to Nurture Digital Talent 2022–2026. Republic of Korea Government.
Ribble, M., & Bailey, G. (2004). Digital citizenship at all grade levels. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(4), 26–28.
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
UNESCO. (2024). AI competencies for teachers and learners. UNESCO Publishing.
UNICEF. (2017). The State of the World's Children 2017: Children in a digital world. https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-children-2017
UNICEF Innocenti – Global Office of Research and Foresight. (2025). Childhood in a digital world. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/reports/childhood-digital-world
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4
Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. ทรรศนะและข้อคิดเห็นใด ๆ ที่ปรากฏอยู่ในวารสาร ECT Education and Communication Technology Journal เป็นของผู้เขียนโดยเฉพาะ สำนักเทคโนโลยีการศึกษา มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช และกองบรรณาธิการไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นพ้องด้วย
2. กองบรรณาธิการของสงวนลิขสิทธิ์ในการบรรณาธิการข้อเขียนทุกชิ้น เพื่อความเหมาะสมในการจัดพิมพ์เผยแพร่