Assessment Quality in the AI Era: A Conceptual Framework for Academic Management in International Schools
คำสำคัญ:
Academic Management, Assessment Quality, International Schools, Educational Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Quality Assurance, Educational Administrationบทคัดย่อ
Assessment quality in international schools is no longer only a technical issue of rubrics, moderation or examination security. Generative AI has made this problem more urgent because polished student products may conceal the learning process that produced them. The research gap addressed in this article is that current AI-assessment debates often focus on detection and integrity violations, whereas less attention is given to the systems through which schools manage assessment quality. This conceptual article synthesizes literature on academic integrity, educational leadership, organizational trust, stakeholder engagement, quality assurance and AI governance. It proposes a six-domain framework for academic management: policy coherence, assessment architecture, staff capability and calibration, AI governance, stakeholder role clarity and quality-assurance feedback loops. The framework is presented as a recursive management cycle rather than a checklist. Its main implication is that international-school leaders should not rely on surveillance or AI-detection tools alone, but should build defensible academic systems that make learning evidence visible, moderation decisions consistent and stakeholder expectations transparent.
Downloads
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bretag, T. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of academic integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
Bunnell, T., Fertig, M., & James, C. (2016). What is international about International Schools?
An institutional legitimacy view. Oxford Review of Education, 42(4), 408-423. https://doi.org/ 10.1080 /03054985.2016.1195735
European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/ 153756
Harris, A. (2021). The relationship between school leaders and education stakeholders. Regional Center for Educational Planning, UNESCO. https://rcepunesco.ae/en/KnowledgeCorner/WorkingPapers
/WorkingPapers/For%20Online%20-%20Harris%20-%20The%20Relationship%20Between%20 School%20Leaders%20and%20Education%20Stakeholders%20%281%29.pdf
Hayden, M. (2006). Introduction to international education: International schools and their communities. SAGE.
International Center for Academic Integrity. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity
(3rd ed.). https://www.academicintegrity.org/aws/ICAI/pt/sp/values
Kofinas, A. K., Tsay, C. H.-H., & Pike, D. (2025). The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(6), 2522-2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13585
Leithwood, K. (2021). A review of evidence about equitable school leadership. Education Sciences, 11(8), Article 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080377
McIntosh, S., & Hayden, M. (2022). Disrupting conventional conceptions of parental engagement: Insights from international schools. Research in Comparative and International Education, 17(1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999211038423
OECD. (2012). Strengthening integrity and fighting corruption in education. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2012/09/strengthening-integrity-and-fighting-corruption-in-education_g1g1fc09.html
OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190658-en
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/ en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research
UNESCO IIEP. (2020). Building an institutional culture of academic integrity. ETICO. https://etico.iiep. unesco.org/en/building-institutional-culture-academic-integrity
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2026 Educational Management and Innovation Journal

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.