The Development of Evaluation Competencies Building for Basic Education School Administrators: An Application of Evaluation Capacity Building
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aims to 1. analyze and determine the evaluation competency of the basic education school administrators, 2. survey the evaluation competency of the Basic Education School Administrators, 3. develop the evaluation competency building of the basic education school administrators through the application of the evaluation capacity, and 4. test the evaluation competency building model of the basic education school administrators through the application of the evaluation capacity building approach. The studies of the related documents and literatures were carried out. The data collection on the evaluation competency was conducted from those 400 samples while that on the evaluation competency building model of the basic education school administrators through the application of the evaluation capacity was carried out from those 11 participants.
It is revealed that the evaluation competency of those basic education school administrators comprises 4 dimensions: 1. the evaluation of the policy, plan, and project, 2. the main evaluation, 3. the evaluation on the staff performance, 4. the evaluation based on the educational quality assurance system respectively. The administrators need to have the self-development in terms of the curriculum evaluation. The development of the evaluation competency building model through the application of the evaluation capacity comprising the principle in helping a person or an organization to have the evaluation capacity and effectively making use of the evaluation, thus resulting in the continual and sustainable development. The 3-side goals are a person, an organization, and a project with the five phases: 1. inspiration creation phase, 2. objective building phase, 3. context analysis, 4. evaluation capacity building phase, and 5. evaluation phase respectively. There are 4 strategies: 1. training and orientation 2. online training 3. coaching and 4.being as the learning community. Holistically, the evaluation of the competency building efficiency model is at the high level. The highly evaluated dimension is the possibility standard followed by the standards on the implementation, the correctness, and the appropriateness.
Article Details
Article Screening Policy
- All research and academic articles to be published must be considered and screened by three peer reviews in the relevant field / article.
- All articles, texts, illustrations and tables published in the journal are the personal opinions of the authors. Editors don't always have to agree. And no responsibility whatsoever is the sole responsibility of the author.
- The articles to be published must never be published. Where did you first publish? And not in the consideration of other journals If the audit found that there has been a duplicate publication It is the sole responsibility of the author.
- Any article that the reader sees as being plagiarized or impersonated without reference. Or mislead the work of the author Please let the journal editor know it will be your greatest blessing.
References
2. King, J. A., Stevahn, L., Ghere, G., & Minnema, J. (2001). Toward a taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 229-247.
3. Krittiya Wongkorm (2004). The teacher development model in learning assessment based on empowerment evaluation according to the National Education Act B.E. 2542. (Dcotoral degree dissertation), Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
4. Labin, S. N., Duffy, J. L., Meyers, D. C., Wandersman, A., & Lesesne, C. A. (2012).
A research synthesis of the evaluation capacity building literature.
American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 307-338.
5. Morra Imas, L. G. (2010). The movement for global competencies for development evaluators. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the CES, Victoria, BC. Available at http://www.ideas-int.org/documents/file_list.cfm.
6. Office of the permanent secretary ministry of education. (2009). A study of capacity model for teacher and educational personnel Act B.E. 2542 2551-2552. Bangkok: Decordia Design Co.,Ltd.
7. Preskill, H., & Boyle, S. (2008). A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(4), 443-459.
8. Satida Sakulrattanakulchai. (2010). Development of evaluation models for architecture studio instruction using empowerment evaluation. (Dcotoral degree dissertation), Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
9. Sirichai Kanjanawasee. (2003). Development of quality indicators for the performance of educational personnel.. Journal of Education Studies. Chulalongkorn University, 31(3), 12-29.
10. Sompong Panhoon. (2005). Development of empowerment evaluation checklist for development teacher' and students' evaluation skills. (Dcotoral degree dissertation), Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
11. Taut, S. (2007). Studying self-evaluation capacity building in a large international development organization. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(1), 45-59.
12. Thanyarat Chokshathid. (2010). A model of teacher performance development :
an application of performance-based teacher evaluation and empowerment evaluation approaches. (Dcotoral degree dissertation), Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.