Main Article Content
The purpose of this experimental research was to develop learning activities to enhance reflective thinking by using reflective journal writing. The type of experimental research is quasi-experimental. This learning activities is applied to the experimental group and the pretest- posttest are carried out on both groups to compare the change of reflective thinking and to assess the satisfaction of participants in learning activities. The research sample consisted of 40 full time Bangkok Airways Reservation & Ticketing staffs in Thailand by voluntary selection are assigned to the experimental group and control group 20 staffs in each group. The learning activities are consisted of three learning processes that are reflective learning, reflective practice by using Gibbs’ reflection cycle and sharing. The data gathering instruments consisted of lesson plan of reflective learning activities, thinking questionnaire and learning activities evaluation form. The quantitative data were analyzed by arithmetic mean, standard deviation and t-test combined with qualitative data analysis. The result of the study revealed that the learning activities have an effect on reflective thinking enhancement. Research findings showed that 1) the mean of score of reflective thinking of experimental group were higher than those before the experiment at a .01 level of significance. 2) the mean of score reflective thinking of experimental group after the experiment were higher than control group at a .01 level of significance. 3) participants were highly satisfied with overall of learning activities.
Article Screening Policy
- All research and academic articles to be published must be considered and screened by two peer reviews in the relevant field / article.
- All articles, texts, illustrations and tables published in the journal are the personal opinions of the authors. Editors don't always have to agree. And no responsibility whatsoever is the sole responsibility of the author.
- The articles to be published must never be published. Where did you first publish? And not in the consideration of other journals If the audit found that there has been a duplicate publication It is the sole responsibility of the author.
- Any article that the reader sees as being plagiarized or impersonated without reference. Or mislead the work of the author Please let the journal editor know it will be your greatest blessing.
2. Chirema, K. D. (2007). The use of reflective journals in the promotion of reflection and learning in post-registration nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 27(1): 192-202.
3. Chuenlertsakul, K. (2001). Reflective learning: study of student nurse. Journal of Faculty of Nursing Burapha University. 9(2): 44-50. (In Thai)
4. Fukude, L. (2003). Journaling: a quasi-experimental study of student nurse’s reflective learning ability. Curationis. 26(2): 49-55.
5. Gibbs, G. (2008). Learning by Doing : A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford : Oxford Polytechnic.
6. Kember, D. et al. (2008). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 25(4) : 381-395.
7. Klanklin, T. (2008). Learning Experience through daily reflective writing in nursing. Journal of nursing and education. 1(2): 2-18. (In Thai)
8. Luankaew, K. (2016). Knowledge Worker in Thailand 4.0. (Online). Retrieved August 1, 2017, from http://www.bangkokbiznews.com/blog/detail/638113. (In Thai)
9. Malee, S. (2007). Knowledge Workers with professional government officer. Journal of government officer. 52(2): 12-15. (In Thai)
10. Nuntapaiboon, J. (2018). Service Psychology. Bangkok: Se-education. (In Thai)
11. Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professional think in action. London: Temple Smith.
12. Srisaard, B. (2002). Introduction of Research. Bangkok: Suveeriyasarn. (In Thai)