The Administration of State Affairs by Administrative Officials Uthai Thani Province

Abstract

The objectives of this research were: 1) to study the general conditions, problems, and obstacles related to public administration among administrative officers 2) to investigate the public administration practices of these officer, Uthai Thani Province. The methodology employed in this study was a mixed methods approach. Qualitative research methods were utilized, including in-depth interviews conducted with 19 key informants, as well as focus group discussions involving 8 participants. The collected data were analyzed using content descriptive interpretation.

The results of this research found that:

1. General conditions, problems, and obstacles in the administration of state affairs by government officials in Uthai Thani Province: The administration of state affairs by government officials in the province was characterized by their responsibility according to authority and work at the local level, in accordance with the State Administration Regulations Act. Some of the obstacles identified include social trends, political factors, power dynamics, and vested interests. Additionally, the frequent need to switch positions, lack of continuity in operations, and short durations for centrally defined missions contributed to mission inaccuracies and hindered the achievement of objectives. Budgetary constraints, limited manpower, and insufficient tools, materials, and equipment were further limitations faced by these officials.
2. The administration of state affairs by government officials in relation to four indicators is outlined as follows: 1) Evaluation of effectiveness: The assessment criteria used did not incorporate moral principles, resulting in a lack of application of such principles in the evaluation process 2) Quality assessment: Operations were guided by established regulations, representing a quantitative approach. The application of principles in the assessment process ensured the absence of obstacles since adherence to regulations was prioritized 3) Efficiency evaluation: Assessment of satisfaction levels was dependent on the evaluation method employed, with the integration of principles into efficiency assessment being emphasized 4) Organization competency development: The organization operated within a closed system. Therefore, the integration of Dharma principles into competency development was deemed necessary.