The development of reading comprehension abilities with the Panorama technique For Prathomsuksa 4 s

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to study the ability of reading comprehension of Prathomsuksa 4 students studying according to the Panorama Technique reading comprehension learning management plan and to compare the learning achievements of Prathomsuksa 4 students before and after the reading comprehension learning management using the panorama technique. The sample group used in this study was Prathomsuksa 4 students at Ban Khonsawan School, Khonsawan Subdistrict, Khonsawan District, Chaiyaphum Province. Chaiyaphum Elementary School District 1, Semester 1, Academic Year 2022, 22 students were obtained by simple random sampling. The research tools were: an activity plan for learning reading comprehension using the panorama technique, a reading comprehension test, and a reading comprehension achievement test. For Prathomsuksa 4, the Thai learning subject group was a multiple-choice test with 4 options and 30 items. The statistics used in the research were basic statistics such as percentages and mean. Statistics used to determine the quality of the tool were the content validity of the reading comprehension test. Index of item objective congruence (IOC), Reliability of the entire learning achievement test. using Lovett's method, the reliability of the reading comprehension assessment questionnaire was used. using the alpha coefficient formula Cronbach's Coefficient, A statistic used to determine the effectiveness of a learning activity plan. according to the 80/80 criterion using the formula E1/E2, statistics were used to test the hypothesis Comparison of achievement in reading comprehension and reading comprehension between pre-learning and post-learning using the t-test formula.

The results showed the reading comprehension ability to read comprehension with a plan of learning activities using the panorama technique. Prathomsuksa 4 students are at a better level. which has an overall reading comprehension score (= 3.25, S.D. = 0.18) at a very good level with an average score of questioning tests at (= 3.49, S.D. = 0.18), at a very good level In terms of answering questions, the average score was (= 3.76, S.D. = 0.21), at a very good level. Recording knowledge from reading had an average score of (= 3.32, S.D.= 0.24) at a very good level Writing a summary of the main idea had an average score of (= 2.91, S.D. = 0.11), in a good level and the valuation aspect had an average score of (= 2.76, S.D.= 0.19), at a good level. and Prathomsuksa 4 students studying with a plan of learning activities using the panorama technique. The mean scores of achievements after learning (= 24.68, S.D.= 1.49) were higher than before (= 17.59, S.D.= 2.86), with a statistically significant difference at the .01 level.