A Comprehensive Study on the Institution of Amicus curiae and the Current Practice inInvestor-State Arbitration
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
Amicus curiae, as a commonly used Latin term, the literal meaning is “friend of the court”. Amicus curiae are ordinarily justified on the basis of the friends are in a position to provide courts or arbitral tribunals their special perspectives or expertise relating to a dispute. The emergence of amicus curiae in Roman times undoubtedly provided courts an essential method to avoid erroneous decisions, and this practice was well developed in both common law and civil law jurisdictions, also the modern international proceedings, such as the investor-state arbitration. Even though allowing amicus curiae participation in investor-state arbitration would increase disputing parties burdens because the parties have to spend extra times and costs for reviewing amicus submissions, amicus participation is indeed playing a crucial role in preserving the public interests involved in investment arbitration, assisting arbitral tribunals to reach legitimate awards, bringing allegations against state’s illegal behaviours, contributing to the development of international investment law, and avoiding fragmentation of international law. Due to the benefits, the institution of amicus curiae has been officially adopted by modern investment treaty as well as prominent arbitration rules.
Article Details
O ความคิดเห็นใดๆ ที่ลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารนิติสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ เป็นของผู้เขียน (ความคิดเห็นใดๆ ของผู้เขียน กองบรรณาธิการวารสารนิติสังคมศาสตร์ ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย)
O กองบรรณาธิการ CMU Journal of Law and Social Sciences ไม่สงวนสิทธิ์ในการคัดลอกแต่ให้อ้างอิงแหล่งที่มาด้วย