The Applications of Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling for Technology Management Research: A Systematic Literature Review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the application of Partial Least Square (PLS) used in technology management research. This systematic literature review aims to provide PLS trends of and the guidelines from previous studies. A systematic, comprehensive review of 155 studies from the technology management area from 2010 through 2020 was conducted. In this paper, the results from the data analysis are illustrated and discussed. These results summarize not only the trends of using PLS from 2010-2020 but also the guidelines for using PLS in data analysis. The findings of this review can be used as critical guidelines for future research in technology management.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All submitted articles are subject to academic validation by qualified experts (peer review). The opinions expressed in each article of this publication are those of the authors themselves. The editorial board holds no responsibilities on them and does not reserve the copyright for academic use with the condition that the reference of their origin is cited.
References
Abhari, K., Davidson, E. J., & Xiao, B. (2017). Co-innovation platform affordances: Developing a conceptual model and measurement instrument. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(5), 458- 495.
Acosta-Prado, J. C., Navarrete, J. F. F., & Tafur-Mendoza, A. A. (2020). Relationship between conditions of knowledge management and innovation capability in new technology-based firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2150005.
Akter, S., D’Ambra, J., & Ray, P. (2011). Trustworthiness in mHealth information services: An assessment of a hierarchical model with mediating and moderating effects using Partial Least Squares (PLS). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 100-116.
Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 514-538.
Basri, W. (2019). Investigating factors affecting the business management of Saudi food industry by SMART-PLS, measurement, and structural equation models: Moderating role of knowledge management. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 18(3), 426-439.
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.
Bessonova, E., & Gonchar, K. (2019). How the innovation-competition link is shaped by technology distance in a high-barrier catch-up economy. Technovation, 86, 15-32.
Cepeda-Carrion, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Cillo, V. (2019). Tips to use Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 67-89.
Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS quarterly, 19(2) 237-246.
Colombo, M. G., & Rabbiosi, L. (2014). Technological similarity, post-acquisition R&D reorganization, and innovation performance in horizontal acquisitions. Research Policy, 43(6), 1039-1054.
Dewey, A., & Drahota, A. (2016). Introduction to systematic reviews: Online learning module cochrane training. Retrieved from https://training.cochrane.org/interactivelearning/module-1-introduction-conducting-systematic-reviews
Farooq, A., Laato, S., & Islam, A. N. (2020). Impact of online information on self-Isolation intention during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(5), e19128.
Gabriel, M. L. D. D. S., & Da Silva, D. (2017). Diffusion and adoption of technology amongst engineering and business management students. International Journal of Innovation, 5(1), 20-31.
Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Hügel, S., & Kreutzer, M. (2020). The impact of organisational slack on innovative work behaviour: How do top managers and employees differ?. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 2050022.
Hwang, W. S., Choi, H., & Shin, J. (2020). A mediating role of innovation capability between entrepreneurial competencies and competitive advantage. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(1), 1-14.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In M. Williams & W. P. Vogt (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 562-589). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Linton, J. D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2004). Perspective: Ranking the technology innovation management journals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(2), 123-139.
Martínez-Cañas, R., Sáez-Martínez, F. J., & Ruiz-Palomino, P. (2012). Knowledge acquisition’s mediation of social capital-firm innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 61-76.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1967). Psychometric theory, McGraw-Hill series in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2013). Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems: Theory, methodology and evidence. Research Policy, 42(5), 1015-1038.
Roxas, B., Battisti, M., & Deakins, D. (2014). Learning, innovation and firm performance: Knowledge management in small firms. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(4), 443-453.
Samra, Y. M., Zhang, H., Lynn, G. S., & Reilly, R. R. (2019). Crisis management in new product development: A tale of two stories. Technovation, 88, 102038.
Santos-Vijande, M. L., López-Sánchez, J. Á., & Rudd, J. (2016). Frontline employees’ collaboration in industrial service innovation: Routes of co-creation’s effects on new service performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 350-375.
Segarra-Oña, M., Peiró-Signes, A., Albors-Garrigós, J., & Miguel-Molina, B. D. (2017). Testing the social innovation construct: An empirical approach to align socially oriented objectives, stakeholder engagement, and environmental sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(1), 15-27.
Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 148-169.
Singh, D., Khamba, J. S., & Nanda, T. (2017). Structural equation modelling of technology innovation model using AMOS for Indian MSMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 21(1), 72-96.
Sorooshian, S. (2017). Structural equation modeling algorithm and its application in business analytics. In M. Tavana, K. Szabat, & K. Puranam (Eds.), Organizational productivity and performance measurements using predictive modeling and analytics (pp. 17-39). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0654-6.ch002
Steelman, Z. R., Hammer, B. I., & Limayem, M. (2014). Data collection in the digital age: Innovative alternatives to student samples. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 355-378.
Tabeau, K., Gemser, G., Hultink, E. J., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017). Exploration and exploitation activities for design innovation. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(3/4), 203-225.
Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1645-1653.
Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J. F., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 70, 356-365.
Williams, C., & Nones, B. (2009). R&D subsidiary isolation in knowledge-intensive industries: Evidence from Austria. R&D Management, 39(2), 111-123.