Participatory Visual Quality Evaluation of Significant Elements of Chiang Mai Old City.
Keywords:
Visual Quality, Chiang Mai Old City , ParticipatoryAbstract
This research was aimed at: 1) analyzing and evaluating the values of Chiang Mai old city’s landscape elements in terms of the historical and urban landscape importance, 2) prioritising the old city’s elements and the degree of visual qualities by the researcher and the community people through a participatory approach, and 3) proposing a guideline for the designation of the major viewing corridor conservation zones for Chiangmai urban landscape management planning. The research was conducted by means of a qualitative research method using the visual perception concept to determine the protected vistas of Chiangmai old city and using the concept of visual quality assessment as the research framework. The research procedures involved theoretical studies, survey and observation in order to determine the major views of the city. The 52 views were evaluated for their values, and preliminary and participatory interviewing was performed with 71 community people sampled by the purposive method to cover all urban areas. The interviewed people were given a chance to exchange ideas and express their needs including the values of the major viewing corridor conservation zones, which will lead to participation that is an important component of sustainable development. The statistical processed data shows that Doi Suthep is an urban element with the greatest landscape, aesthetic, and historical values for the people in the communities. When combined with the temples, important buildings, archaeological sites and tree groups; the view becomes even more important. The quality of major views is not at a critical level, but the problem with the greatest impact involves the high-rise buildings, which continuously increase and should be urgently controlled. Major viewing conservation areas are designated in 3 zones according to the nature of the views as follows: 1) viewing-corridor conservation zone, 2) short-distance view conservation zone, and 3) distant-view conservation zone. All of the major viewing corridor conservation zones can be divided into 4 categories according to the specific characteristics of each area, which are: 1) continuous view of Doi Suthep, 2) major city elements view, 3) view from the area along the Ping River, and 4) panorama views.
References
Ali R. et al., (2014). Explanation of Environmental Aesthetic Factors of Urban Design. Tehran: Urban Design at Art and Architecture Faculty of Tarbiat Modares University.
American Society of Landscape Architects. (1979). Visual Impact Assessment for Highway Projects. Washington: D.C.American Society of Landscape Architects.
Apavatjrul Charoenmuang, D. (2005). mư̄ang yangyư̄n nai Chīang Mai nǣokhit læ prasopkān khō̜ng mư̄ang nai hupkhao [Sustainable cities in Chiang Mai : a case of a city in a valley]. Chiang Mai: Social Research Institute, Chiang Mai University.
Chiang Mai University. (2016). khrōngkān čhattham phǣn patibatkān dān kānʻanurak læ phatthanāphư̄nthī prawattisāt læ watthanatham mư̄ang Chīang Mai tām nǣo mō̜radok lōk raya thīnưng (khrōngkān Chīang Mai sū mư̄ang mō̜radok lōk). [Chiang Mai World Heritage Initiative Project]. In ʻēkkasān prakō̜p ngān thalǣng khāo læ radom khwāmkhithen khrang thīsō̜ng phư̄a sanapsanun Chīang Mai sū mư̄ang radap lōk [Press Conference and Brainstorming To Support Chiang Mai to the World Heritage City (2nd time)]. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai Provincial Administrative Organization.
Chulasai B. (2004). kān wikhro̜ phonkrathop singwǣtlō̜m thāng dān suntharīyaphāp[Environmental Impact Assessment Aesthetic]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing.
Farringdon Urban Design. (2010). Study Baseline Study Report excerpts London Borough of Islington LDF evidence base. London: Alan Baxter & Associates.
Josh C. (2014). Diagram of human visual field. [Online]. Retrieved August 10, 2018, Retrieved from https://blog.mozvr.com/quick-vr-prototypes/
Larry W. (1996). Canter Environmental ImpactAssessment. Singapore : McGrew Hall.
Mehmet Kıvanç A. (2013). Visual Quality Assessment Methods in Landscape Architecture Studies. [Online]. Retrieved June 26, 2018, Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-landscape-architecture/visual-quality-assessment-methods-in-landscape-architecture-studies
Ongsakun S. (2006). sēnthāng čhakkrayān sū lǣng rīanrū thāng prawattisāt nai Chīang Mai [Bicycle trails to study Chiang Mai city historical sources]. Chiang Mai : Pinkanakorn Development Agency.
Palawan N. (2012). kānpramœ̄n khunnaphāp thāng sāitā khō̜ng phūm that : kō̜ranī sưksākhunnaphāp chœ̄ng that bon thanon rāt damnœ̄n čhangwat ืnakhō̜n sī tham rāt[Landscape visual assessment : a case study of the Ratchadamnoen road, Nakhon Si Thammarat province]. (Master of Landscape Architecture Program). Faculty of Architecture, Silpakorn University.
Rattakasigorn S. (2013). kānphatthanā mư̄ang Chīang Mai læ panhā saphāwa wǣtlō̜m [Chiang Mai City Development and Environmental Problems]. In ʻēkkasān prakō̜p kān banyāi Chīang Mai nai sāitā khō̜ng khonnō̜k [Articles, lecture notes Chiang Mai in the eyes of outsiders]. Bangkok: Faculty Of Architecture Chulalongkorn University
Richard C. et al. (1986). Foundation for Visual Project Analysis. New York: John Willey&Son,Inc.,
Robert Tavernor. (2007). Visual and cultural sustainability: The impact of tall buildings on London. London : Director Cities Programme, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Simon Bell. (1999). Landscape Pattern and Process .London : E&FN.
Song-im W. (2004). phonkrathop thāng sāitā khō̜ng ʻākhān sūng phư̄a kān yūʻāsaithī mī tō̜ wat nai bō̜riwēn Krung Thēp Mahā Nakhō̜n [Visual Impact of Tall Residential Buildings on Temples in Bangkok Area]. (Master of Landscape Architecture Program). Faculty of Architecture, Silpakorn University.
Tansukanun P. (2016). kānʻanurak chumchon mư̄ang [Urban Conservation]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Views and opinions expressed in the journal do not necessarily reflect those of the editors.
