Factors and Processes Contributing to Grade 6 Students’ English Achievement in the Ordinary National Educational Test (O-NET) of Peripheral Schools in Thailand

Main Article Content

Chanadda Poohongthong

Abstract

The aims of this study are 1) to explore factors contributing to Grade 6 students’ English achievement in the Ordinary National Educational Test (O-NET) of peripheral schools and 2) to compare processes of developing students’ English achievement in O-NET of peripheral schools. A conceptual framework in this research employed the perspectives of educational psychology and sociology of education. The research design of multiple case study approach and collecting qualitative data by interviews, field notes, and document analysis were produced in 20 participants in 4 schools. Thematic analysis technique for within-case analysis emerged factors of School A, B, C, and D that contributing to Grade 6 students’ English achievement in O-NET of peripheral schools were similarly organic collaborative teams, characteristics of professional teachers, brain-based instruction, sense of challenge toward educational problems, and changing teaching practices. Only characteristics of innovative teacher and collective action were factors of School C that distinguished from other schools. Using cross-case analytical procedure, this finding revealed that process of developing student’s English achievement in all case studies were associated with process of transformative learning theory. Moreover, one school from all cases reflected entirely to process of decolonizing the educational framework which expressed stages that differ from other schools: systemic solving with deep of the illiteracy, and developing students goes beyond O-NET to English literacy. The results contribute to changing teaching practices of teachers and school directors in their own classrooms and school even slightly, the academic achievement of students living in poverty, low socioeconomic background, and educational inequality can improve and succeed outstandingly in English literacy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Poohongthong, C. (2024). Factors and Processes Contributing to Grade 6 Students’ English Achievement in the Ordinary National Educational Test (O-NET) of Peripheral Schools in Thailand. Journal of Inclusive and Innovative Education, 8(1), 46–60. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmujedu/article/view/272241
Section
Research Article

References

Allison-Burbank, J. D., Conn, A., & Vandever, D. (2023). Interpreting Diné epistemologies and decolonization to improve language and literacy instruction for Diné children, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 54(3), 707-715.

Barone, D. (2003/2004). Second grade is important: Literacy instruction and learning of young children in a high-poverty school. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(4), 965-1018.

Carlisle, J. F., Kelcey, B., & Berebitsky, D. (2013). Teachers' support of students' vocabulary learning during literacy instruction in high poverty elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal,50(6), 1360-1391.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). The problem of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(4), 295-377.

Collazo, N. A. J., & Hindrix, K. (2023). A pioneering framework for decolonizing higher education. SN Social Sciences, 3, 1-19.

Copland, F., Garton, S., & Burns, A. (2013). Challenges in teaching English to young learners: Global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 738-762.

Cummins, J. (2007). Pedagogies for the poor? Realigning reading instruction for low-income students with scientifically based reading research. Educational Researcher, 36(9), 564-572.

EF Education First. (2023). English proficiency index. Retrieved from https://www.ef.com.

Egilsson, B. R., Einarsdóttir, J., & Dockett, S. (2021). Parental experiences of belonging within the preschool community. International Journal of early Childhood, 53, 31-47.

Ellis, S., Thompson, I., McNicholl, J., & Thomson, J. (2018). Student teachers’ perceptions of the effects of poverty on learners’ educational attainment and well-being: Perspectives from England and Scotland. In O. McNamara & J. McNicholl (Eds.), Poverty Discourses in Teacher Education (1st ed.). Routledge.

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.

Finn, G. M., & Matthan, J. (2021). Colonization, cadavers, and color: Considering decolonization of anatomy curricula. The Anatomical Record, 305, 938-951.

Funa A. A., Ricafort, J. D., Jetomo, F. G., & Lasala Jr. N. L. (2024). Effectiveness of brain-based learning toward improving students’ conceptual understanding: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 17(1), 361-380.

Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Volume two: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.

Lao, R., Parks, T., Phuaphansawat, V., Tongliemnak, P., Lawthong, N., Nakyam, S., & Lek-Uthai, A. (2021). Jak kham thathay su khunnaphap kansueksa khong prathedthai: Kodrabiab kanborehan lae khampenphunum [The challenges in the delivering quality education in Thailand: Rules, resources and leadership]. The Asia Foundation. [in Thai]

Linjaroen, A., Ardwichai, S., & Chanin. P. (2009). The causal factors effect on low level of O-NET in grade 6 and 12. (Research report). Bangkok: The National Institute of Educational Testing Service. [in Thai]

Massey, D. (2010). “You teach!” beginning teachers’ challenges to teacher educators. Reading Research and Instruction, 43(4), 75-94.

Mezirow, J. (2008). An overview on transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.) Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists…In their own words (pp. 90-105). London: Routledge.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A Methods sourcebook. London: Sage.

Nawarat, N. (2018). Kansueksa phahuwattanatham: Mummong chaeng vipak lae kan patibutkan nai rongrain [Multicultural education: Critical perspectives and praxis in schooling]. Chiang Mai: Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University. [in Thai]

Nomnian, S., & Arphattananon, T. (2018). School administrator’s competencies for effective English language teaching and learning in Thai government primary school. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(2), 51-70.

Office of the basic education commission. (2022, May 31). Moving an educational administrator of office of the basic education commission 2022. Office of the basic education commission. [in Thai]

Olsen, A., Fassbender, W., Long, D., & Olsen, K. (2022). Schools, communities, and teachers: How rural sense of belonging holds impact for English teachers in place. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 32(2), 108-125.

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.

Phairot, E., Khemanuwong, T., Boonthong, N., Angsuwatanakul, T., & Uampittaya, P. (2022). Examining gender and socioeconomic status predictability in English reading comprehension among Thai EFL undergraduates. Journal of Faculty of Education Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, 9(1), 96-111.

Poohongthong, C. (2023). Thailand’s sustainable literacy competence in peripheral school: The Bannongkae school model. Thammasat Review, 26(2), 24-43.

Smagorinsky, P. (2001). If meaning is constructed, what is it made from? Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 133-169.

Spivey, D. S. (2006). Characteristics of teachers who are consistently successful with economically disadvantaged students: A qualitative study about fourth and fifth grade teachers who are successful with economically disadvantaged students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. North Carolina State University.

Teeraeak, A. (2017). Phasa choa phasa nay: Kanmueang bueanglang kansueksa phasa angkruet samay ratchakantiha [Royal discourse noble language: The politics behind English education in the reign of Rama V]. Matichon Publishing. [in Thai]

The national institute of educational testing service. (2023). Results of the O-NET. Retrieved from https://catalog.niets.or.th/ [in Thai]

The national statistical office. (2023). Poverty line by region and province. Retrieved from http://statbbi.nso.go.th [in Thai]

Winichakul, T. (2020). Moments of silence: The unforgetting of the October 6, 1976, Massacre in Bangkok. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). CA: Sage Publications.

Zehner, E. R. (2017). Improving English educational outcomes in Thailand’s semi-rural upper south: Toward getting better results. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 7(1), 257-274.