A Study of The Conditions and Needs for One-To-One Technology Enhanced Learning Model Using Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning to Enhance Upper Elementary Students’ Digital Literacy

Authors

  • Nanthana Boothdaken Department of Educational Technology and Communications, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University
  • Prakob Koraneekij Education Technology and Communications, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Conditions and Needs, One-To-One Technology Enhanced Learning, Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to study of the conditions and needs for one-to-one technology enhanced learning model using process oriented guided inquiry learning to enhanced upper elementary students’ digital literacy. The sample group consisted of 384 teachers and educational personnel from Bangkok Metropolitan Administration primary schools, selected through simple random sampling. The research instrument is a questionnaire on conditions and needs for one-to-one technology enhanced learning model using process oriented guided inquiry learning to enhance upper elementary students’ digital literacy. Data were analyzed using includes statistical methods such as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, with prioritization of needs determined by the Modified Priority Needs Index (PNI modified).

The study’s findings indicate that the highest priority need is for students to participate in online discussions, exchanges, or expressions of opinions on various topics. Following this, the next priority is assigning students to create work using digital technologies such as laptops and cloud-based tools (e.g., Google Workspace for Education). Lastly, enabling students to utilize data to generate new information through digital technology to effectively create new works ranks as the third priority.

References

นิตยา วงศ์ใหญ่. (2560). แนวทางการพัฒนาทักษะการรู้ดิจิทัลของดิจิทัลเนทีฟ. วารีเดียน อี-เจอร์นัล มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร, 10(2), 1630-1642. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/99734/77505

ประกอบ กรณีกิจ และจินตวีร์ คล้ายสังข์. (2566). บทสรุปสำหรับผู้บริหาร. ศูนย์เชี่ยวชาญเฉพาะทางสิ่งประดิษฐ์และนวัตกรรมการศึกษา คณะครุศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

มูลนิธิสานอนาคตการศึกษาคอนเน็กซ์อีดี. (2564, 19 กุมภาพันธ์). การจัดการเรียนรู้โดยใช้เทคโนโลยีเป็นฐาน. ทรูปลูกปัญญา. https://www.trueplookpanya.com/education/content/87883/-teamet-

ยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ พ.ศ. 2561-2580. (2561, 13 ตุลาคม). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา, 135(82ก), 1-71.

สุวิมล ว่องวาณิช. (2558). การวิจัยประเมินความต้องการจำเป็น (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3). วี.พริ้นท์ (1991).

สำนักบริหารงานการมัธยมศึกษาตอนปลาย. (2558). แนวทางการจัดทักษะการเรียนรู้ในศตวรรษที่ 21 ที่เน้นสมรรถนะทางสาขาอาชีพ. โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย.

Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, K., Sharples, M., Brown, T., Patton, C., Cherniavsky, J., Pea, R., Norris, C., Soloway, E., Balachefe, N., Scardamalia, M., Dillenbourg, P., Looi, C. K., Milrad, M., & Hoppe, U. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3-29. https://telearn.hal.science/hal-00190632

Dunleavy, M., Dexter, S., & Heinecke, W. (2007). What added value does a 1:1 student to laptop ratio bring to technology-supported teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 440-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00227.x

Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.

Hakim, A. A. A., Hashim, H., Shuhidan, S. M., & Shuhidan, S. M. (2019). The 21st Century Learning: Incorporating Heutagogical Approach and Digital Information Literacy.

The International Journal of e-learning and Higher Education, 11(1), 85-103. https://journalined.uitm.edu.my/images/Vol111/Vol11_June2019.pdf

Hanson, D. M. (2006). Instructor's guide to process-oriented guided-inquiry learning. Pacific Crest.

Kailani, R., Susilana, R., & Rusman. (2021). Digital Literacy Curriculum in Elementary School. TEKNODIKA, 19(2), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.20961/teknodika.v19i2.51784

Koraneekij, P., & Khlaisang, J. (2023). Google Solutions for Education in Thailand: Enhancing Active Learning for 21st Century Students with Google Workspace and Chromebooks. Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University.

Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504551

Tohara, A. J. T., Shuhidan, S. M., Bahry, F. D. S., & Nordin, M. N. B. (2021). Exploring Digital Literacy Strategies for Students with Special Educational Needs in the Digital Age. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(9), 3345-3358. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i9.5741

Walker, L. C., Johnson, A. F., & Silvernail, D. L. (2012). Early observations of high school development of one-to-one technology: A qualitative look at one-to-one computing in Maine high schools. Education and Technology, 8. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/cepare_technology/8

Downloads

Published

2025-07-25

How to Cite

Boothdaken, N., & Koraneekij, P. (2025). A Study of The Conditions and Needs for One-To-One Technology Enhanced Learning Model Using Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning to Enhance Upper Elementary Students’ Digital Literacy. ECT Education and Communication Technology Journal, 20(29), 137–149. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ectstou/article/view/277403