Learning Leadership of School Administrators and School Culture Affecting Quality of Teaching and Learning of Teachers under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 1
ภาวะผู้นำการเรียนรู้ของผู้บริหารสถานศึกษาและวัฒนธรรมของโรงเรียนที่ส่งผลต่อคุณภาพการจัดการเรียนการสอนของครู สังกัดสำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษา มัธยมศึกษา เขต 1
Keywords:
Learning Leadership of These School Administrators, School Culture, Quality of Teaching and Learning of TeachersAbstract
The purposes of this research were to study: 1) learning leadership of school administrators under the Secondary Education Service Area Office 1, 2) School culture, 3) quality of teaching and learning of teachers, and, 4) learning leadership of school administrators and school culture affecting quality of teaching and learning of the teachers. A sample population of 361 were randomly selected from the teachers in academic year 2019. The instrument used was a questionnaire. The statistics used in this research were percentage, mean, standard deviation, Pearson Product Moment Correlation and, Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis.
The research results showed as follows. 1) Learning leadership of these school administrators was overall at the high level ( = 3.93, SD = 0.68). 2) Overall school culture was also at the high level ( = 4.09, SD = 0.48). 3) Overall quality of teaching and learning of teachers was again at the high level ( = 4.27, SD = 0.46). 4) Learning Leadership of school administrators and school culture did affect quality of teaching and learning of teachers (correlation coefficient = 0.27-0.71), with statistical significance of 0.01. Together they could reach 65.5 percent to predict quality of teaching and learning of teachers.
The research results showed as follows. 1) Learning leadership of these school administrators was overall at the high level ( =4.24, S.D.=0.48). 2) overall school culture of these schools was also at the high level ( =4.09, S.D.=0.50). 3) overall quality of teaching and learning of teachers was again at the high level ( =4.26,S.D.=0.46). 4) Learning Leadership of school administrators and school culture did affect quality of teaching and learning of teachers (correlation coefficient=0.273-1.00, with statistically significant of 0.01). They could together 65.5 percent predict quality of teaching and learning of teachers.
Downloads
References
Administrative Regulations Act, Ministry of Education. (2003, July 3). Royal Gazette. Vol.120 Part 62 a. [in Thai]
Denison, D. (1991). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Engels, N., G. Hotton, G. Devos, D. Bouckenooghe & A. Aelterman. (2008). Principals in
Schools with a Positive School Culture. Educational Studies, 34(3), 157-172.
Hoy, W. K., & C. G. Miskel. (2013). Educational Adminnistration (6th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Khongchai, T. (2017). Factors Affecting Performance Quality of Teachersin the 21st Century of College in PhetchaburiProvince, Vocational Education Commission. Veridian E-Journal, 10(2), 351-354. [in Thai]
Kositpimanvach, E., & Agsonsue, P.(2018). Organization Culture of Private Schools. Dhammathas Academic Journal, 18(3), 363-371. [in Thai]
Lee, M., & K. S. Louis. (2019). Mapping a Strong School Culture and Linking it to Sustainable School Improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 84-96.
Niyamabha, A. (2019). Digital Quality of Education: Challenges of School Administrators. In Pakotan, J. (Eds.), Total Management Articles Education and Learning Management Towards Education in the Digital age, set 1 (p. 133). Ubon Ratchathani: Witthaya 1973 press. [in Thai]
OECD. (2013). Learning for 21th Century Learning. OECD Publishing.
Office for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment. (2014). Identification and Evaluation Criteria Round 4 (2016-2020). Retrieved September 5, 2019, from http://www.onesqa.or.th/th/download/899/ [in Thai]
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2010). Policy of the Office of the Education
Commission Basic. Bangkok: Success Publication. [in Thai]
Office of the Secretary of the National Strategy Board. (2018). National Strategy 2018- 2037. Bangkok: 21 Century. [in Thai]
Runcharoen, T. (2019). The Study of Leaning Leadership of School Administrators and
Classroom Management of Teachers. In Pakotang, J. (Eds.), Total Management Articles Education and Learning Management Towards Education in the Digital age, set 1 (p. 11). Ubon Ratchathani: Witthaya 1973 press. [in Thai]
Secondary Education Service Area Office 1. (2018). Information of Secondary Education
Service Area Office 1. Retrieved August 26, 2019, from https://www.sesao1.go.th/ about/vision.html [in Thai]
Shafer-Landau, R. (2018). What Makes a Good School Culture?. Retrieved August 26, 2018, from https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/18/07/what-makes-good-school-culture
Somprach, K. (2015). Learning Leadership of School Principals: A Grounded Theory Study (Research report). Khonkean: Major Field: Educational Administration, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]
Somprach, K. (2017). Leadership and School Quality. Khonkean: Khon Kaen University
Press. [in Thai]
Tayraukham, S. (2012). Research Methodology for Social Science and Humanities. Maha Sarakham: Mahasarakham University Press. [in Thai]
Wongkhong, J. (2017). Indicators of Learning Leadership for School Administrators in the Office of Secondary Educational Service Area 25. Journal of Education Graduate Studies Research, KKU, 11(2), 48-58. [in Thai]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Idea and suggestion proposed in articles of EMI Journal belong to and stem from authors. Editor, editorial board, and EMI Journal committee are not and will not intervene authors’ standpoint. By this, the university, editor, and editorial board will not responsible for any consequence occurred by the present of author’s idea and suggestion publicized in the EMI journal.
