Needs of Academic Administration Development of Secondary Schools for Development of Students’ Innovative Thinking Skills

ความต้องการจำเป็นในการพัฒนาการบริหารงานวิชาการโรงเรียนมัธยมศึกษา เพื่อการพัฒนาทักษะการคิดเชิงนวัตกรรมของนักเรียน

Authors

  • Anupong Clongkran โรงเรียนวัดสิงห์

Keywords:

Academic Administration, Innovative Thinking Skills, Development Needs, Secondary Schools

Abstract

This research aimed to: 1) study the present state and the desirable state of academic administration of Secondary Schools for development of students’ Innovative thinking skills; 2) study the needs of academic administration development of Secondary Schools for developing students’ Innovative thinking skills. This research applied a quantitative approach. The population were secondary schools under the secondary educational service area office, totally 2,358 schools. The samples were 342 secondary schools, selected by applying Stratified Random Sampling, and simple random sampling. The key respondents were 1,026 people including 3 administrators or deputy administrators, academic teachers and teachers from each school. The research instrument was a questionnaire. The data were analyzed by frequency, percentage, means, standard deviation and PNImodified.

The research findings were as follows. 1) The present state and the desirable state of academic administration of Secondary Schools for developing of students’ Innovative thinking skills were at a high level and the highest level, respectively.
2) The needs of academic administration development of Secondary Schools for developing students’ Innovative thinking skills could be classified with regard to academic administration. Overall, the highest Priority Needs Index fell on curriculum development followed by teaching and learning and measurement and evaluation, respectively. When classified with Innovative thinking skills. Overall, the highest Priority Needs Index was Higher-Order Thinking, followed by Creative leadership, Creativity, Collaborative Inquiry and Applicative Thinking, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burkhardt, Gina et al. (2003). enGauge 21st Century Skills: Literacy in the Digital Age. Illinois: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory and the Metiri Group.

Chalamwong, Y. (2014). Thai workers in a new context: Vocational education for the nation. [Online]. Retrieved from http://tdri.or.th/tdri–insight/thai–labour–force/ [Febuary 17, 2017]

Chell, E., & Athayde, R. (2009). The Identification and Measurement of Innovative Characteristics of Young People: Development of the Youth Innovation Skills Measurement Tool. London: NESTA.

Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

De Jong, J. P. J. (2007). Individual Innovation: The connection between Leadership and Employee Innovative Work Behavior. Zoetermeer: EIM.

Domrongpanit, S. (2018). The Relationships between the Results of External Educational Quality Assessment of the Office for National Educational Standards and Quality Assessment (2011-2015) and the Ordinary National-Educational Testing (O-Net) in the Basic Education Schools. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.noesqa.or.th/th /th/contentlist-view/934/1560/ [January 13, 2020]

Drucker, F. Peter. (1999). Knowledge - Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challeng. California Management Review, 41(2), 78-94.

Horth, D., & Buchner, D. (2014). Innovation Leadership: How to use innovation to lead effectively work collaboratively and drive results. London: Center for Creative Leadership.

Kanchanawasri, S. (2009). Classical test theory (6th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

Kleysen, F. Robert & Street, T. Christopher. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(3), 284-296.

Luepong, P. (2012). The Competency Development of Human Resource. Executive Journal, 32(4), 103-108. [in Thai]

Maesincee, S. (2016). Thailand 4.0. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.industry. go.th/ict/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id330. [March 11, 2016]

Ministry of Education. (2007). Ministerial Regulations define rules and procedures for decentralization of administration and education. (May 16, 2007). Royal Gazette. Vol.124 Part 24 a. [in Thai]

Panich, V. (2012). Ways to create the 21st Century Skills for students. Bangkok: Sodsri-Saridwongso Foundation. [in Thai]

Pholphirul, P. (2013). Creative Economy and Development Issues in Thailand. Nida Economic Review, 7(1), 1-4. [Online]. Retrieved from http://tcithaijo.org/index. php/NER//article/viewFile/22675/19396 [January 13, 2016]

Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

Sinlarat, P. (2006). Creative And Productive Education. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

Solow, M. Robert. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(2), 65-94.

Srisaard, B. (2011). Preliminary research (9th ed.). Bangkok: Suwiriyasat.

Sutthijakra, S. (2011). The Role of Universities in Producing Innovative Graduates. Bangkok: Dhurakij Pundit University. [in Thai]

Thailand Development Research Institute. (2014). Recommendations for Fundamental educational Reform. Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute. [in Thai]

Weiss, S. Davic & Legand, P. Claude. (2011). Innovative Intelligence. Ontario: John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd.

Wonganutaroj, P. (2010). Academic administration. Bangkok: Bangkok Supplementary

Media Center. [in Thai]

Wongwanich, S. (2015). Needs Assessment Research. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

Wuttrirong, P. (2010). Innovation and Thailand's competitiveness Towards Creativity Economy. Chulalongkorn Review, 22(86), 43-67. [in Thai]

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row Publications.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-09

Issue

Section

Research articles