Development of Learning Activities to Enhance The Design Thinking Process in The Innovation and Digital Technology for Education Course of The Bachelor of Education Program Students, Roi Et Rajabhat University
การพัฒนากิจกรรมการเรียนรู้ เพื่อส่งเสริมกระบวนการคิดเชิงออกแบบ รายวิชานวัตกรรมและเทคโนโลยีดิจิทัลเพื่อการศึกษา ของนักศึกษาหลักสูตรครุศาสตรบัณฑิต มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏร้อยเอ็ด
Keywords:
Design Thinking, Instruction Model, Design Thinking Process, Learning ActivityAbstract
This research aimed to develop learning activities and to study the satisfaction results of the innovation and digital technology for education course of students in the Bachelor of Education program, Roi Et Rajabhat University that promoted the design thinking process. The sample was based on the purposive sampling technique to recruit 30 students from the general science course, Faculty of Education, Roi Et Rajabhat University. The research tools were Learning activities that promoted the design thinking process, student assessment form and the student satisfaction assessment form. The results showed that learning activities which promoted the design thinking process consisted of 4 steps: Step 1: Understand with the following learning activities: Empathy and Define. Step 2: Brainstorm with the following learning activities: Decompose and Idea. Step 3: Creation with the following learning activities: Prototype and Present. And step 4: Test: Moreover, the student's satisfaction with the overall learning activities were very satisfactory (Mean is 4.48, Standard Deviation is 0.55).
Downloads
References
Announcement of the Ministry of Education On Higher Education Institutions Standards B.E. 2561. (2018, August 17). Government Gazette. No.135 Special Section 199 D. pp. 19-21. [in Thai]
Asanok, M. (2018). Integrated Design Thinking for Instructional Innovation Development. Journal of Educational Technology and Communications Faculty of Education Mahasarakham University, 1(1), 6-12. [in Thai]
Bennett, S. et al. (2016). Investigating University Educators’ Design Thinking and the Implications for Design Support Tools. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (1), 9, 1-10, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jime.404
Bucha, S., & Chookhampaeng, S. (2020). The Development of Learning Activity in Biology by Design Thinking with Participatory Learning to Promote Creativity of Grade 11th Students. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 7(12), 210-221. [in Thai]
Klahan, P., & Ponegrn, W. (2020). The Development Learning Activity Based on Design Thinking method and Project Based Learning Enhance to Innovator of Student Grade 10. (Master’ thesis Silpakorn University). http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/ handle/123456789/3118 [in Thai]
Lohsomboon, N. et al. (2020). Design Thinking Process to Create Innovative Art Expression. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 22(1), 343-352. [in Thai]
Matthews, J., & Wrigley, C. (2017). Design and Design Thinking in Business and Management Higher Education. Journal of Learning Design Special Issue: Business Management, 10(1), 42-54.
Srisa-ard, B. (2002). Introduction to research (7th ed.). Bangkok: Suweeriyasarn. [in Thai]
Strakhovich, E. (2018). How Students-Managers Use Design Thinking to Collect It-Project Requirements. 15th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2018).
Tangpakdee, R. (2017). The Effects of Competency Development of Instructional Design for Media Production by Using Instructional Model of Community Based Learning with Design Thinking Process of Undergraduate Students of Educational Technology and Communications Major, Mahasarakham University. E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 10(3), 123-137. [in Thai]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Educational Management and Innovation Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Idea and suggestion proposed in articles of EMI Journal belong to and stem from authors. Editor, editorial board, and EMI Journal committee are not and will not intervene authors’ standpoint. By this, the university, editor, and editorial board will not responsible for any consequence occurred by the present of author’s idea and suggestion publicized in the EMI journal.