The Reducing Capacity of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Homestays: A Case Study of the Comparisons between Koh Kurd and Sai Noi Community, Ayutthaya Province

Main Article Content

Suwajee Tangon
Yaowaporn Lertkultanon

Abstract

This article aims to present the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from homestays before and after conducting a low carbon homestay project and to present the capacity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from homestays of Koh Kurd and Sai Noi community, Ayutthaya Province. A variety of research methods were used in this study: informal interview, participatory observation, and field note.


     Before implementing the project, the GHG emissions of most homestays from Koh Kurd and Sai Noi communities came from electricity consumption (98.08%) and waste (75.10%), respectively.  The total amount of GHG from homestays of both communities is at 7.705 and 50.603 KgCO2 equivalent, respectively.  After implementing the project, it was found that electricity consumption from the homestays of Koh Kurd community was the only activity that generated greenhouse gases while the emissions from those of Sai Noi mostly came from the consumption of electricity and waste.  The total amount of GHG from the homestays of Koh Kurd and Sai Noi communities is at 7.557 and 13.118 KgCO2 equivalent, respectively. 


     The capacity to reduce GHG emissions from the homestays of Koh Kurd and Sai Noi communities accounted for 1.921% and 74.077%, respectively.  The homestays of Koh Kurd community were able to reduce emissions from transportation and waste the most while those from Sai Noi community could reduce emissions from waste the most at 100%.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tangon, S. . ., & Lertkultanon, Y. . . (2020). The Reducing Capacity of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Homestays: A Case Study of the Comparisons between Koh Kurd and Sai Noi Community, Ayutthaya Province. Dusit Thani College Journal, 13(2), 330–346. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journaldtc/article/view/241075
Section
Research Article

References

1. Becken, S. (2005). Harmonising Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation: The
Case of Tourist Resorts in Fiji. Global Environmental Change, 15, (4), pp. 381-393.
2. Commonwealth of Australia. (2002). Energy efficiency opportunities in the hotel industry Sector. Legislative Services, Canberra.
3. Department of Tourism. (n.d.). Homestay Standard Thailand. Retrieved July 7, 2012, from http://www.homestaythai.net/homestay.aspx
4. German International Cooperation (GIZ) and Designated Areas for Sustainable Tourism
Administration (Public Organization) – DASTA. (2012). A Managed Model of Low
Carbon Tourism in Thailand. Bangkok: German International Cooperation.
5. Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE) King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT). (2010). Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculation. King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT). Bangkok: Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning.
6. Ministry of Tourism and Sports. (2011). The National Tourism Development Plan 2012-2016. Retrieved May 7, 2015, from www.tceb.or.th.
7. Office of the National Economics and Social Development Council. (2011). The Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan (2012 - 2016). Bangkok: Sahamitr Printing and Publishing.

8. Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP). (2013). (Draft) Strategic Plan for Climate Change of Nan Municipality. Bangkok: Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning.
9. Shiming, D. and Burnett, J. (2002). Energy Use and Management in Hotels in Hong
Kong. Hospitality Management, 21, pp. 371-380.
10. Tangon, S. (2013). Study of Variables Affecting Electricity Consumption and
Greenhouse Gas Emission of Hotels in Thailand. Bangkok: The Joint Graduate
School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE). King Mongkut’s University of Technology
Thonburi (KMUTT).
11. Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (Public Organization) – TGO. (2013). Guidelines for Corporate Carbon Footprint (CCF) Assessment. Corporate Carbon Footprint Promotion Project. Second Edition.
12. Xuchao, W., Priyadarsini, R. and Eang, L. S. (2009). A Study on Energy Performance of
Hotel Buildings in Singapore. Energy and Building, 41, pp. 1319-1324.