The Relationship Model among Digital Leadership Work Engagement and Teacher Performance Effectiveness under The Secondary Educational Service Area Office Pathum Thani

Authors

  • Ruja Rodkhem Graduate School, Eastern Asia University
  • Surachai Sikkhabandit Graduate School, Eastern Asia University
  • Koranut Sakulkrit School of Business Administration, Eastern Asia University
  • Apiprai Doungnoi Office of Academic Affairs, Eastern Asia University

Keywords:

Digital Leadership, Work Engagement, and Teacher Performance Effectiveness

Abstract

       The objectives of this research were to (1) study the level of digital leadership work engagement and teacher performance effectiveness (2) study the direct and indirect effect of digital leadership work engagement on teacher performance effectiveness (3) examine the consistency of the relationship model among digital leadership work engagement and teacher performance effectiveness with empirical data. The sample consisted of 265 teachers. Data were collected using a questionnaire. The gathered data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and structural equation modelling (SEM).

                     The research results found that 1) The overall average level of digital leadership work engagement and teacher performance effectiveness were at a high level (  = 4.33 SD = 0.54,  = 4.46 SD = 0.48, = 4.45 SD = 0.44) respectively. 2) Digital leadership and work engagement had a positive direct effect on teacher performance effectiveness (b = 0.38 p<0.01, b = 0.54 p<0.01). Digital leadership had a positive direct effect on work engagement (b = 0.78, p < 0.01) and had an indirect effect on teacher performance effectiveness through

work engagement (b = 0.42, p<0.01). The total effect value was 0.80, explaining the variation of teacher performance effectiveness at 76 %. 3) The relationship model among digital leadership work engagement and teacher performance effectiveness was consistent with the empirical data (c2 /df = 1.30 p-value = 0.06 RMR = 0.0076 RMSEA = 0.034 GFI = 0.96 AGFI = 0.93 NFI = 0.99 and CFI = 1.00). Based on the findings, administrators should develop and apply digital leadership to enhance teachers' work engagement to work effectively and achieve school’s goals.

References

Agustina, R., & Kamdi, W. (2020). Influence of the principal’s digital leadership on the

reflective practices of vocational teachers mediated by trust, self efficacy, and

work engagement. International journal of learning, teaching and educational research,

(11), Doi: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.11.2

Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career development

international, 23(1), 4-11

Best, W. J. (1997). Research in education. Boston MA.: Allyn and Bacon.

Baipakdee, S. (2022). Administrative factors affecting the effectiveness of teacher

performance in schools under Sakon Nakhon Primary educational service area 3

Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University.

Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3540132

Buachoo, T., & Buachoo, T. (2020). The status of digital leadership of education

management administrators. Journal of educational studies, 13(2), 294-285.

Chairungrojpanya, S., Chamchantharawong, C., & Tangkawanich. (2023) Relationship between result-based

goals, work engagement and performance of the teachers at Chiang Rai Municipality Schools. Journal

of administration and social science review, 6(6), 25-38.

Chaemchoy, S. (2018). Educational administration in the digital era. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)

Chaemchoy, S. (2019). Educational administration in the digital era. (2rd ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)

Chuchom, A. (2014). Causal relationship model of attachment and commitment to teachers' work.

Bangkok: Srinakarinwirot University. (in Thai)

Elliott, T. (2017). Digital leadership: A Six-Step framework for transformation.

Retrieved from http://www.digitalistmag.com/author/telliot

Gallup. (2013). State of the global workplace. Washington DC: The Gallup Headquarters

Hamzah, N. H., Nasir, M. K. M., & Wahab, J. A. (2021). The effects of principals’ digital leadership

on teachers’ digital teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Journal of

education and e-learning research, 8(2), 216.

Jan Nikkie, C., Maquidato, Rammel, T., & Bayani, E. D. (2024). Workload and work engagement among

the teachers: A descriptive-correlational study. Journal of environmental economics,

commerce and educational management, 11(7), 139-147 Doi: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra0414

Jamlongkun, C. (2020). The relationship model among transformational leadership work engagement,

and job performance of head nurses in general hospitals under ministry of public health.

Christean University.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement

work. Academy of management journal, 33, 692-724.

Kicom, A., & Chusorn, P. (2024). Digital leadership of school administrators affecting

innovative teachers under the secondary educational service area office Udon Thani.

Journal of educational technology and communications Faculty of Education

Mahasarakham, 7(22),

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.

Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Liang, H., Vasudevan, A., Bamini, J., Xiao, L., Vasumathi, A., & Galdolage, B. S. (2024).

Promoting job performance among teachers through work engagement in Hong

Kong: The shared mediation model. Journal of infrastructure, policy and

development, 8(16), 7352. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd7352

Luksanapawan, B., & Somprach, K. (2019). Collective leadership affecting effectiveness of

teacher’s performance in schools under the secondary educational service office area

Dhammathas academic journal, 19(4), 1-13

https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dhammathas/article/view/216333/158568

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of

meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work.

Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 77(1), 11–37. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892

Nawaz, H., Jabbar, M. N., Naveed, M., & Malik, F. Q. (2023). Relationship between digital

leadership competencies and teachers’ performance: Structural equation model

analysis Pakistan. Journal of distance & online learning, 9(2), 51–72

Onlaor, C., & et.al. (2020). Digital leadership for educational administrators. Journal of bandit

Asia college, 10(1), 108-119.

Özgenel, M., & Mert, P. (2019). The role of teacher performance in school effectiveness.

International journal of education technology and scientific researches, 4(10), 417- 434.

Pakorn, J. (2021). Model of digital leadership for administrators in schools under the authority

of the office of the basic education commission.

Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)

Pruksa, V., & Letamarasak, G. (2024). Digital leadership of school administrators affecting

teacher performance in the 21st century under the Pathum Thani primary educational

service area office 1. Sirindhorn periscope journal, 25(1), 288-296.

Sanphuwa, A. (2022). The relationship between school administrators’ Tranformational

leadership and the effectiveness of teacher performance under Udon Thani primary

educational service area office 3. Sakon Nakhon: Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat

University. (in Thai)

Saeed, S., & Kang, M. A. (2024). The impact of digital leadership on the performance of

secondary teachers. Academy of education and social sciences review, 4(1), 12–20.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i1.696

Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary Manual.

UWES. Retrieved from

http://www.beanmanaged.com/doc/pdf/arnoldbakker/articles/articles_arnold_bakker_87.pdf

Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Van Rhenen, W. (2008). Work aholism, burnout and work engagement: Three of

a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being.? Applied psychology: An international review, 57,

-203.

Sudibjo, N., & Riantini, M. G. D. (2023). Factors affecting teachers' work engagement: The

case of private school teachers in Jakarta Metropolitan. Indonesia. reice. revista

iberoamericana sobre calidad, eficacia y cambio en educación,

(1), 119-137. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2023.21.1

Schaufeli, W. B., & et al. (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample

confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of happiness studies, 3, 71-92.

Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing time. Newbury

Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Siddique, A., Khanum, B., & Haleem, B. (2022). Work engagement and job performance of

teachers: A correlational study. Global educational studies review, 7(1), 502-516.

Suksena, N., Kanjug, P., & Sirisooksilp, S. (2022). Digital leadership of school administrators

affecting teacher performance effectiveness in elementary school under the

office of Chaiyaphum primary education service area 2. Panyapiwat

journal, 14(3),

Thannimalai, R., & Raman, R. (2018). Principals' technology leadership and teachers' technology

integration in the 21st century classroom. International journal of civil engineering and

technology, 9(2), 177-187.

Thuamyang, C., & Parnichparinchai, T. (2022). Causal relationship model of engagement

of teacher government officials under the office of basic education commission,

Phitsanulok Province. Journal of humanities and social sciences: Sakthong, 26(3),

The Pathum Thani Secondary Education Service Area Office. (2024). Number of teachers and educational

personnel. Retrieved from https://spmpt.go.th/school/

Wiratchai, N. (1999). LISREL: Statistical analysis for research. (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University

Press. (in Thai)

Wright, G., & Ritter, J. (2024). What is digital leadership?. Retrieved from

https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/definition/digital-leadership

Wasono, L. W., & Furinto, A. (2018). The effect of digital leadership and innovation management for

incumbent telecommunication company in the digital disruptive era. International journal of

engineering and technology, 7, 125–130.

Yasanop, K., & Lertamornsak, G. (2024). Digital leadership affecting the personnel

administration effectiveness of school administrators in the office of secondary

educational service area Nonthaburi. Interdisciplinary academic and research

journal, 4(1), 93-112

Yuan, F., & Wang, J. (2024). How does digital leadership affect teachers’ life satisfaction in

primary and secondary schools: The sequential mediating role of digital

technology skills and work engagement Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389280888

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย