Approaches for Academic Management Development of Secondary School Consortium of Ratchaburi Area 4 Based on the Concept of Design Thinker

Authors

  • Pimpattra Khowtawon Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Academic Management, Design Thinker, Secondary School

Abstract

          This study was a descriptive research. The research purposes were: 1) to study the priority needs in the academic management of Secondary School Consortium of Ratchaburi Area 4 based on the concept of Design Thinker; and 2) to propose approaches for the Secondary Schools Consortium of Ratchaburi Area 4 based on
the concept of Design Thinker. The total number of sampled respondents was 503, involving 5 school directors, 36 heads of departments, 92 teachers and 370 students. The research instrument was a set of five-level rating scaled questionnaire for needs assessment, and an evaluation form for the rating of suitability and the feasibility of the proposing approaches. The data were analyzed by frequency distribution, percentage, mean, standard deviation, Modified Priority Needs Index: PNImodified and content analysis.

          The findings revealed that: 1) the priority needs index pointed firstly to the development and promotion of learning resources, followed by the students’ learning assessment and evaluation, the curriculum development, and the instructional management; 2)there were four main approaches and six sub-approaches for the academic management development, (1) to improve and support the establishment of learning resources that enable the students to focus on prototype-building and action-oriented behaviors, (2) to improve the learning assessment and evaluation by focusing on creativity, (3) to develop the curriculum by focusing on cultivating human-centeredness among students, and (4) to improve instructional management that cultivates the quality of human-centeredness in students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.

Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.

Carrol, M. P. (2014). Shoot For The Moon! The Mentors and the Middle Schoolers Explore the Intersection of Design Thinking and STEM. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1).

Carroll, M. (2014). Learning from What Doesn’t Work: The Power of Embracing a Prototyping Mindset. Retrieved from web.stanford.edu/group/redlab/cgi-bin/publications_resources.php

Chammuang, C. (2009). Test Guide for school director and education administrators. Bangkok. [in Thai]

Department of Education, (2008). Evaluation and Selection of Learning Resources. Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Retrieved from http://www.schoolofeducators. com/wp- content/uploads/2011/12/EXPERIENCE-EDUCATION-JOHNDEWEY.pdf

Duening, T. N. (2008). Five Minds for the Entrepreneurial Future: Cognitive Skills as the Intellectual Foundation for Next Generation Entrepreneurship Curricula. paper published at the 2008 Conference of the USASBE, Jan.

Dunne, D., & Martin, R. P. (2006). Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion.

El Mhouti, A., Nasseh, A., & Erradi, M. (2013). Development of a tool for quality assessment of digital learning resources. International Journal of Computers Applications, 64(14).

Graves, C. (2014). What Is a Makerspace?, Knowledge Quest, 42(4), 8-13.

Gallagher, A., & Thordarson, K. (2018). Design Thinking for School Leaders: Five Roles and Mindsets that Ignite positive change. Alexandria, Virginia USA: ASCD.

Hawthorne, G. et al. (2014) Impact and sustainability of creative capacity building: the cognitive, behavioral, and neural correlates of increasing creative capacity, in H. Plattner et al. (Eds.), Design Thinking Research: Building Innovation

Eco-Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 65-77.

Hong, S., & Kwek, D. (2011). Innovation in the Classroom: Design Thinking for 21st Century Learning.

Stanford EDU. (2011). http://www.stanford.edu/group/redlab/cgi-bin/materials/Kwek- Innovation In The Classroom.pdf

HPI School of Design Thinking. (2015). Design thinking at scale. Retrieved from https://hpi.de/meinel/knowledge-tech/innovation-research/design-thinking-at- scale.html

International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). ISTE national educational technology standards (NETS). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Benjamin, W., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Technological Pedagogical.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source Of Learning And Development.

Lande, M. (2011). Underpinnings for learning design thinking: Mindsets and processes for becoming an adaptive design thinker (forthcoming publication). Lor, Rex. (2017). Design Thinking in Education: A Critical Review of Literature.

Luchs, M. (2016). A brief introduction to design thinking. In M. Luchs, K. Swan & A. Griffin (Eds.), Design thinking: new product development essentials from the PDMA (pp. 1-12). Hoboken: (NJ): Wiley.

Ministry of Education. (2007). Ministerial Regulations define rules and procedures for decentralization of administration and education. (2007, 16 May). Royal Gazette. Vol. 124 Part 24 a. [in Thai]

Noipinit, P., Supap, W., & Klineam, C. (2016). An Effect of Using Design Thinking Process in the Topic of Conic Sections to Enhance Creative Problem Solving Ability of Grade 10 Students. Journal of Rangsit University: Teaching & Learning, 13(1) January

-June 2019. [in Thai]

Owen, C. (2007) Design thinking: notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.

Roozenburg, N., Chen, L., Stappers, P., Leurs, Bas, Mulder, Ingrid & Van Waart, Peter. (2011). Developing a Human-Centered Attitude Through Experiential Learning.

Rowe, P. (1987). Design Thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Royalty, A., Oishi, L., & Roth, B. (2014). Acting with creative confidence: Developing a creative agency assessment tool. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research. Building innovation eco systems (pp. 79-96). Cham: Springer.

Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2008). Learning Resources Evaluation Guidelines. Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Ministry of Education.

Scheer, A., & Plattner, H. (2011). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8-19.

Schweitzer, J., Groeger, L., & Sobel, L. (2016). The design thinking mindset: An assessment of what we know and what we see in practice, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 2(1), 71-94.

Taylor, B. (2016), Evaluating the Benefit of the Maker Movement in K-12 STEM Education, Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science (EIJEAS), Vol. 2.

Thai government gazette. (2018). National Strategy A.D. 2018-2037. Retrieved from https://www.nesdc.go.th/download/document/SAC/NS_PlanOct2018.pdf

UNICEF Thailand. (2019). Education for the 21st Century: Placing skills development at the heart of education. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/thailand/stories/ education-21st-century

Vehachart, R. (2007). Administrational management and school base basic. Songkhla: Thaksin University. [in Thai]

Viseshsiri, P. (2012) Academic administration and quality assurance handout for course 2747732. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

Von Thienen, J., Royalty, A., & Meinel, C. (2017). Design thinking in higher education: How students become dedicated creative problem solvers, 306-328.

White House. (2014). President Obama to host first-ever White House Maker Faire. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/

/18/fact-sheet-president-obama-host-first-ever-white-house-maker-faire

Wonganutaroj, P. (2010). Academic administration. Bangkok: Bangkok Supplementary Media Center. [in Thai]

Downloads

Published

2021-04-20

Issue

Section

Research articles