Approaches for Developing Learning Environment Management to Enhance Innovator Characteristics of Kaenchanwittaya School Students
Keywords:
Learning Environment Management, Innovator CharacteristicsAbstract
The purposes of this research were: 1) to study the priority needs of developing learning environment management to enhance innovator characteristics of Kaenchanwittaya school students; 2) to purpose approaches for developing learning environment management to enhance innovator characteristics of the students. The research informants consisted of 1 school director, 3 co-directors, 38 teachers and 3 educational personnel. The total of this research were 45 informants. The research instrument used in this study was 5 rating scaled questionnaire. The data ware analyzed by frequency distribution, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Modified Priority Needs Index (PNImodified).
The research results turned out as follows. The priority needs of developing learning environment management, sorted from the highest to the lowest PNImodified revealed that: 1) for Physical Environment (PNImodified = 0.391); the highest element of priority need was Risk-Taking (PNImodified = 0.425); 2) for Management Environment (PNImodified = 0.390), the highest element of priority need was Risk-Taking (PNImodified = 0.422); 3) for Academic Environment (PNImodified = 0.379), the highest element of priority need was Experimenting (PNImodified = 0.400). There were 3 main approaches; 1) transform classroom and learning area conditions into those that encourage risk-taking and experimenting in both teachers and students through evaluation of school’s physical environment. 2) improve management system based on the principle that teachers need to be led innovators through evaluation of current management system. and 3) create academic environments through education design that aims to build the innovator characteristics in learners.
Downloads
References
Alawad, Abeer. (2012). How to Influence Students’ Risk-Taking Behaviour in Order to Enhance their Creative and Critical Thinking Processes: Life Science Journal. December 2, 2012.
Astin, A. W. (1971). The college environment. New York: American Council on Education.
Bagley, O’R. (2014). The ten traits of great Innovators. Retrieved October 7, 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/rebeccabagley/2014/01/15/the-10-traits-of-great-innovators/#2a0733664bf4
Bascia, N. (2014). The School Context Model: How School Environments Shape Students’ Opportunities to Learn. In Measuring What Matters, People for Education. Toronto: November 8, 2014
Blanford, S. (2006). Middle Leadership in Schools. London: Pearson Longman.
Coulter ’04, Krista A. (2004). Classroom Structure as an Environmental Effect on Creative Production of College Students. Retrieved August 4, 2008, from https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/psych_honproj/26
Couros, G. (2015). The Innovation’s Mindset [Kindle version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com
Day, J. (2016). 10 qualities of great innovators. Retrieved October 5, 2019, from https://ideascale.com/10-qualities-of-great-innovators/
Deming, W. E. (1993). The New Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Department of Academic Affairs (2006). Guideline for developing educational standard in schools “Managing Learning Environment”, second print, Bangkok.
Dessler, G. (2004). Management, Principles and Practices for Tomorrow’s Leaders. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Dyer, J. (2011). The Innovator’s DNA. Harvard Business Review Press. Retrieved from Amazon.com
Fayol, H. (1916). General and Industrial Management. Washington, D.C.: Robert Brookings Charles Scripner’s Sons.
GE Global Innovator Barometer. (2011). Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http //files. gereport.com/wp-content/upload/2011/01/GIB-result.pd
Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (1937). Paper on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
Khamkerd, T. (1990). Managing good environment in school, 8 April, Mitkhru journal. [in Thai]
Mahahing, S. (2015) Research on the environment management methods of the basic educational institution in the Primary Educational Service Area 4, Khon Kaen, 3rd national academic conference, Rajabhat university. [in Thai]
Nui, W., & Sternberg, J. (2003). Societal and School Influences on Student Creativity: The Case of China; Yale University.
Office of the Education Council. (2017). National Education Plan of 2017-2036, Prikwan Graphic, Office of the Education Council.
Pearce J., & Robinson (2009). Strategic Management: Formulation, Implementation, and Control. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Prajan, O., & Chamchoy, S. (2018) Education management and innovation journal. Bangkok: Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Reeve, K. (2019). 5 ways to develop risk taking across your school. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from https://mathsnoproblem.com/blog/teaching-practice /5-ways-develop-risk-taking-across-school/
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (1996). Management (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Self-Assessment Report (SAR). (2017). Kaenchanwittaya school. Petchaburi.
Shimthongdee, N. et al. (2015). School management strategy for developing learning innovation. Retrieved from https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDUCU/article/ view/44565/36913
Siribanpitak, P. (2018). Education management and innovation journal. Bangkok: Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Suthawas, W. (2016). Educational innovator development. [Online]. Retrieved from https://tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E- [in Thai]
Talbert, J., & M. McLaughlin (1999). Assessing the school environment: Embedded contexts and bottom-up research strategies. In S. Friedman & T. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span, 197-227. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association
Wagner, T. (2012) Creating Innovators: The Making of Young People Who Will Change The World [Kindle version].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Idea and suggestion proposed in articles of EMI Journal belong to and stem from authors. Editor, editorial board, and EMI Journal committee are not and will not intervene authors’ standpoint. By this, the university, editor, and editorial board will not responsible for any consequence occurred by the present of author’s idea and suggestion publicized in the EMI journal.