Reflection Lessons for Creating Organizational Core Value in Educational-Sandbox-Pilot Schools: Multiple-Cases of Selective Private Companies
บทเรียนสะท้อนคิดเพื่อสร้างค่านิยมหลักขององค์กรในโรงเรียนนำร่องในพื้นที่ นวัตกรรมการศึกษา : กรณีศึกษาบริษัทเอกชนคัดสรร
Keywords:
Core Values, Education Sandbox Pilot Schools, Private Companies SelectionAbstract
To be successful in a disruptive society, school must provide education in accordance with the contexts and needs of community, while also developing innovative methods to enhance quality of instruction. This article aimed to present a reflection on corporate core values of selected private companies in order to find out how to create the core value for Education-Sandbox-pilot schools. Thailand currently had 413 pilot schools that were using the initiative policy. There private companies were selected whose innovative management and core value demonstrate their excellence. Among the private companies selected were PTG Energy Public Company Limited or PTG, True Corporation Public Company Limited, and UBIS (Asia) Public Company Limited or UBIS. The findings indicated that core values of the organizations can be used to identify Education Sandbox pilot schools’ organizational value including 1) Visionary Leadership 2) Customer – focused Excellence 3) Valuing People 4) Organizational Learning and Agility 5) Managing for Innovation 6) Societal Contributions.
Downloads
References
Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation Management Measurement:
A Review. International Journal of Management Review, 21-47.
Armandi, B., Oppedisano, J., & Sherman, H. (2003). Leadership Theory and Practice:
A Case in Point. Management Decision, 41(10), 1076-1088.
Bureau of Education Innovation Development. (2020). 273 Pilot Schools in 8 Provinces
towards Challenging of the Education Sandbox. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.edusandbox.com/, Accessed on September 1, 2020. [in Thai]
Caldwell, D. F., & O’Reilly C. A. (2003). The Determinants of Team-Based Innovation in Organizations: The Role of Social Influence. Small Group Research, 34(4), 497-517.
Dunegan, K., Tierney, P., & Duchon, D. (1992). Toward an Understanding of Innovation
Climate: Explaining Variance in Perceptions by Divisional Affiliation, Work Group
Interactions, and Subordinate-Manager Exchanges. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (Special Issue 39), 227-236.
Education Sandbox B.E. (2019, 30 April). Royal Thai Government Gazette. vol. 136 parts 56 A., 102-120. [in Thai]
Glaeser, W. (2019). Leadership Skills & Strategies VUCA World. [Online]. Retrieved from
https://www.vuca-world.org/, Accessed on September 1, 2020.
Lertgrai, P. (2019). Innovation Management for Organization Development. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 6(8), 3745-3757. [in Thai]
Morakote, N. (2016). Organizational Value. News - Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, 31(1), 8-10. [in Thai]
Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary Leadership: Creating a Compelling Sense of Direction for your Organization. Journal Articles, (San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publisher, 1992), 119.
National Innovation Agency. (2006). Innovative Dynamic. Bangkok: National Innovation Agency, Ministry of Science and Technology. [in Thai]
National Innovation Agency. (2018). Top 5 Best Organizations Driven by Innovation (In
Thailand). [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.nia.or.th/5ID/, Accessed on September 5, 2020. [in Thai]
Office of Thailand Quality Award. (2019). TQA Criteria for Performance Excellence Framework 2020-2021. Bangkok: Eastern Printing Public Company Limited. [in Thai]
Office of Thailand Quality Award. (2020). Thailand Quality Award 2019. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.https://www.tqa.or.th/th/tqa-winners/, Accessed on September 5, 2020. [in Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2016). Obligation Excellence Collaboration Way. Bangkok: Prik Wan Graphic Company Limited. [in Thai]
Pundt, A. M., & Nerdinger, E. (2010). Innovative Behavior and the Reciprocal Exchange
between Employees and Organizations. German Journal of Research in Human
Resource Management, 24(2), 173-193.
Rangkasiri, T. (2014). Marketing Thought: Management Model for “Students-as-Customers” Metaphor in Thailand. Chulalongkorn Business Review, 36(3), 18-35. [in Thai]
Sanguanwongwan, V. (2011). Management and Organizational Behavior. Bangkok: Pierson. [in Thai]
Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
Sopa, S. (2017). School Administration toward the Excellent School of middle School under The Secondary Educational Service Area Office 25: The Case Study of Waengyaiwittayakhom School. College of Asian Scholar Journal, 7(2), 84-94. [in Thai]
Thaipat Institute. (2010). What is CSR?. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.thaicsr.com /2006/03/blog-post_20.html, Accessed on September 2, 2020. [in Thai]
True Corporation Public Company Limited. (2019). Sustainability Report 2019. Bangkok: True Corporation Public Company Limited. [in Thai]
Upper Secondary Education Bureau, Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2013). Quality Management System Guidelines for TQA. Bangkok: The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand Limited. [in Thai]
Vagadia, B. (2020). Digital Disruption. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Wiles, J. (2009). Leading Curriculum Development. California: Sage Company.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Idea and suggestion proposed in articles of EMI Journal belong to and stem from authors. Editor, editorial board, and EMI Journal committee are not and will not intervene authors’ standpoint. By this, the university, editor, and editorial board will not responsible for any consequence occurred by the present of author’s idea and suggestion publicized in the EMI journal.
