The Teachers’ Ability in Designing Learning Activities with Design Thinking Process to Add Value of Local Products: A Case Study of Bokaew Wittaya School, Kamphaengphet Province.

ความสามารถครูในการออกแบบกิจกรรมการเรียนรู้ด้วยกระบวนการคิดเชิงออกแบบ เพื่อเพิ่มมูลค่าผลิตภัณฑ์ท้องถิ่น : กรณีศึกษาโรงเรียนบ่อแก้ววิทยา จังหวัดกำแพงเพชร

Authors

  • Jakkrit Jantakoon Faculty of Education, Naresuan University

Keywords:

learning activity design, design thinking, adding value of local products

Abstract

Schools in the community have their own additional courses curriculum based on their identity and led to the local products producing. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance teachers' ability to design activities. The purposes of this research were 1) to synthesize behaviors indicating of learning activity design with design thinking process to add value of local products 2) to study the teachers' ability in designing learning activities with design thinking processes to add value of local products. The target group was compiled of 23 teachers at Borkaew Witthaya School, Kampangphet province. The research instruments were a teacher training activity plan, an assessment form for the ability in design learning activities with design thinking process, and teaching observation form. The study divided into two phases. At first, starting with workshop for 12 hours and then following with the lesson study for one semester. The data were analyzed by content analysis and mean.  Research findings were as follows:

  1. Behavior indicating the design of learning activities with design thinking process to add value of local products, in summary, coach students to create new product forms, sales forms, or novel packaging forms and added value in consideration of the needs of users with 5-step process, such as empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test, that was appropriate at a good level.
  2. The teachers’ ability in designing learning activities with design thinking process to add value of local products. The overall level is good, with the highest score was prototyping and the lowest score was the level of understanding the problem. Therefore, teacher development should focus on empathize and define stages because both were most important stages of design thinking process.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anif, S., Sutopo, A., & Joko Prayitno. H. (2020). Lesson Study Validation: Model for Social and Natural Sciences Teacher Development in the Implementation of National Curriculum in Muhammadiyah Schools, Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 253-259. Retrieved from http://www.hrpub.org

Areeraksakul Konglok, S. (2020). The Development of Mathematics Teachers Competency on Learning Management by Using the Lesson Study of Elementary Schools in Nonthaburi Province. STOU Educational Journal, 13(1), 175-190.

Chen, F. (2014). Primary Investigation on reform of post practice mode based on school-enterprise collaborative innovation. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icetss-14/14672

Deborah, J. H. (1991). How To Integrate Language and Content Instruction: A Training Manual (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED359780.pdf

Goldman, S., Carrol, M., & Royalty, A. (2009). Destination, Imagination & The Fires Within: Design Thinking in a Middle School Classroom. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 221629718

Hargreaves, D. H. (2003). Education epidemic: Transforming secondary schools through innovation networks. Retrieved from https://www.demos.co.uk/files/educationepidemic.pdf

Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among pre-service and beginning teachers. Review of educational research, 62, 129-169.

Kriswanto, D., & Hasanah, E. (2021). The principal’s role in improving teacher competence. Journal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(3), 1-13.

Levin, H. (1988). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/ 32362875/Cost_Effectiveness_and_Educational_Policy

Limpanont Promratana, P., & Chantraukrit, P. (2018). Effects of Lesson Study on M.Ed. Students’ Ability in Designing and Teaching Inquiry–Based Science Process Skills Instruction. J. Res. Unit Sci. Technol. Environ. Learning, 9(2), 250-263.

Lui, W. Ch., & Goh, CCM. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions, experience, and Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.

Melles, G., Z. Howard, & S. Thompson-Whiteside. (2012). Teaching Design Thinking: Expanding Horizons in Design Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 162-166.

Ngourungsi, K. (2020). The national direction for research and development. (Unpublished manuscript).

Office of the Education Council. (2018). Thailand Education Scheme (2017-2036). Bangkok: Prikwarn Graphic.

Office of the Education Council. (2019). The National Standard 2018. Nonthaburi: 21century.

Prušević, S., & Filduza. (2020). The Teacher as the Innovator of the Teaching Process. Retrieved from http://www.dhs.ff.untz.ba/index.php/home/article/view/356

Schwartz, D., Bransford, J., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and Innovation in Transfer. Retrieved from http://www.web.stanford.edu/~danls/Efficiency%20and%20Innovation%204_2004.pdf

Stanford d. school. (2016). Design Thinker. Retrieved from https://www.thedesignthinker.com.au/ influencers/stanford-d-school

The Global Innovation Index (GII). (2015). Effective Innovation Policies for Development. https://www. globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/

Verhoef, N. C., Coenders, F., Pieters, J. M., Smaalen, D.V., & Tall, D. O. (2015). Professional development through lesson study: teaching the derivative using GeoGebra. Retrieved from http://www. homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/pdfs/dot2015c-verhoef-et-al-derivative geogebra.pdf

Wasi, P. (2014). Learning Revolution to Turning in Thailand. Bangkok: Pimluck.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-02

Issue

Section

Research articles