DEVELOPMENT OF NEUROLEADERSHIP INDICATORS FOR PIVATE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS UNDER THE OFFICE OF THE PRIVATE EDUCATION COMMISSION
การพัฒนาตัวชี้วัดภาวะผู้นำเชิงประสาทวิทยาศาสตร์ของผู้บริหารโรงเรียนเอกชน สังกัดสำนักงานคณะกรรมการส่งเสริมการศึกษาเอกชน
Keywords:
Leadership, Neuroleadership, Private school AdministratorsAbstract
The objectives of this quantitative research were to: 1) study the conceptual framework; 2) identify the element and Neuroleadership indicators of private school’s administrator; 3) verify the structural straightness of Neuroleadership indicators for private school’s administrator. The sample group was multi-stage randomly chosen from private school administrators. The research tools include interview forms, focus group recordings, and questionnaires. The statistics for this research were: mean, standard deviation, content analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis.
The results of the research were as follows: 1. The conceptual framework of Neuroleadership consisted of 5 attributes indicator; status, certainty, autonomy, relatedness, and fairness. 2. The components and indicators consisted of 5 attributes with 16 indicators as follows; 1) Status consisted of 4 features 2) Certainty consisted of 3 features 3) Autonomy consisted of 3 features 4) Relatedness consisted of 3 features 5) Fairness consisted of 3 features. The results of the confirmatory inspection showed that Neuroleadership indicators of private school administrator were consistent with the empirical data by considering the value of Goodness of fit: 2 = 74.06, df = 65, p-value 0.21; Relative 2 = 1.14; GFI = .98; AGFI = .95, RMR = .01; SRMR = .01, RMSEA = .02
Downloads
References
Ahmet, G. (2021). Neuroleadership: A Conceptual Analysis and Educational Implications. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 9(1), 63-82.
Champajorn, A. (2018). Behaviour of School Administrators. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 3(2), 47-61.
Chantawan, A. (2017). The Influences of Job Autonomy-Openness to Experience Personality and Conscientiousness Personality-Perceived Self-Efficacy on Effectiveness of Academic Performance. Electronic Journal of Open and Distance Innovative Learning, 7(1), 104-123.
Gordon, E. (2000). Integrative Neuroscience: Bringing Together Biological, Psychological and Clinical Models of the Human Brain. Harwood Academic Publishers.
Hamlin, C. R. (2017). Neuroscientific Strategies for Managing Stress Related to Pervasive Change in Public Education. Retrieved April 23, 2022, fromhttps://ursa.mercer.edu/bitstream/handle/10898/5063 /Hamlin_mercer_1160E_10039.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
Kiartivich, S. (2018). Perception of Organizational Climate and Self-Development of Private Employees in Bangkok. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 11(3), 208-219.
Kiartivich, S. (2019). NeuroLeadership: Applying Neuroscience to Leadership and New Public Management. Journal of Politics, Administration and Law, 13(1), 237-250.
Knezevich, S. J. (1984). Administration of Public Education (4th ed.). New York: harper and Raw.
Kwanyuen, P. (2017). The Desirable Characteristics of School Private Administrators as Attitudes by Teacher of Private School in Sattahip Chonburi. [Master’s thesis, Burapha University]. [In Thai]
Kulnanun, T. (2019). Neuroeducation: Current Human Capital Development for the Future. Karupibul Journal, 6(2), 169-183.
Leigh, A., Zwaan, R. V., & Dorrian, A. (2019). The Role of Neuroleadership in Work Engage ment.
SA Journal of Human Resource Management 17.
Makmeesab, A. (2013). Code of Ethics for School Administrator. [Doctoral dissertation, Silpakorn University]. [In Thai]
Molina Carrasco, Z. C., & Collazos Alarcon, M.A. (2021). Quality in the Management Processes of Educational Institutions from the Neuro-Leadership. Revista lberoamericana de educacion.
Patipimpakorm, P. (2007). Leadership Style and Effectiveness of Administrater of Basic Education Private Schools. [Doctoral dissertation, Silpakorn University]. [In Thai]
Phoruksa, P. (2018). Trust in Supervisor, Work Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Job Performance of Professional Nurses in the Private Hospital. J. of Soc Sci & Hum, 44(2), 249-273.
Pope, S. N. (2019). A Systematic Literature Review of School Leadership Intelligences for the Development of Neuro-Educational Leadership. [Master’s thesis, University of New England].
Ringleb, H., & Rock, D. (2008). Chapter 1: The Emerging Field of Neuro-Leadership. pp. 1-29. In D. Rock and A. H. Ringleb (Eds.), Handbook of Neuroleadership. CreateSpace, Scotts Valley, CA.
Rongklad, W. (2016). The Relationships Among Organizational Trust, Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Employees in a Beverage and Food Company. [Master’s thesis, Thammasat University]. [In Thai]
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2008). The Scientifically Substantiated Art of Teaching: A Study in the Development of Standards in the New Academic Field of Neuroeducation. (Mind, Brain, and Education Science). [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, Minnesota].
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2010). Mind, Brain, and Education Science a Comprehensive Guide to the New Brain-Based Teaching. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Wonganutraroj, P. (2003). Academic Administration. Bangkok: Text and Journal Publication.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Educational Management and Innovation Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Idea and suggestion proposed in articles of EMI Journal belong to and stem from authors. Editor, editorial board, and EMI Journal committee are not and will not intervene authors’ standpoint. By this, the university, editor, and editorial board will not responsible for any consequence occurred by the present of author’s idea and suggestion publicized in the EMI journal.
