A Factor Analysis of Digital Competency for Private School Administrators to Promote Learning Management
การวิเคราะห์องค์ประกอบสมรรถนะดิจิทัลเพื่อส่งเสริมการจัดการเรียนรู้สำหรับผู้บริหารโรงเรียนเอกชน
Keywords:
Digital Competency, School Administrators, Confirmatory Factor AnalysisAbstract
The purpose of this research was to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis of the digital competency components for private school administrators to promote learning management. The research tool was a five-rating scale questionnaire with a reliability of 0.97. The samples were 500 private school administrators selected by multistage random sampling. The statistics for data analysis included mean, standard deviation, correlation coefficient and confirmatory factor analysis.
The research findings showed that the components of digital competency for private school administrators to promote learning management comprised of 11 components which were 1) professional development 2) vision 3) digital literacy 4) cooperation 5) communication 6) creativity 7) problem solving 8) resource management 9) work environment 10) information management and 11) staff empowerment. As a result of model testing, it was consistent with the empirical data, by considering Relative chi-square (X2/df) = 1.9606, CFI = 0.939, TLI = 0.933, SRMR = 0.038, RMSEA = 0.044. The factor loading of each component ranged from 0.837 - 0.921 with statistically significant at the 0.01 level.
Downloads
References
Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. Publications Office of the European Union.
Bashir, S. (2020). Digital skills: Frameworks and programs. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Buachu, T. (2019). The Status of digital leadership of education management administrators. Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2), 285-294. [In Thai]
Chaemchoy, S. (2019). School management in digital era. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
[In Thai]
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
CoSN. (2018). Framework of essential skills of the K-12 CTO. Retrieved from https://www.cosn.org/ careers-certification/framework-of-essential-skills/
Damrongpanit, S. (2012). Mplus program for data analysis of behavioural and social sciences. Mahasarakham: Mahasarakham University Printing House. [In Thai]
Davies, A., Fidler, D., & Gorbis. D. (2011). Future work skills 2020. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for the Future for University of Phoenix Research Institute.
Dexter, s. (2008). Leadership for IT in schools in Voogt, J., & Knezedk, G. (Eds.). International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, Springer. New York, 543-554.
Gardner, H. (2007). Five minds for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Imran, F., Shahzad, K., Butt, A., & Kantola, J. (2020). Leadership competencies for digital transformation: Evidence from multiple cases. Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership, July, 2020, 81-87.
ISTE. (2009). ISTE standards: Education leaders. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-education-leaders
Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K., & Sloep P. (2013). Experts’ views on digital competence: commonalities and differences. COMPUTERS and EDUCATION 68 (October 2013); 2013. pp. 473-481.
Keesookpun, E. (2016). School management in digital era. Retrieved from https://www.trueplookpanya. com/education/content/52232 [In Thai]
Khantong, N., & Boobpha, S. (2021). Digital skills of school administrators affecting work motivation of teachers under Nongkhai secondary educational service area office. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 6(4), 148-163. [In Thai]
Klus, F. M., & Muller, J. (2020). Identifying leadership skills required in the digital Age. CESifo Working Paper Series 8180, CESifo.
Ministry of Education. (2564). Digital transformation for education action plan 2020-2022. Bangkok: Bureau of Information and Communication Technology.
Minister of Education and Higher Education, Quebec Canada. (2019). Digital competency framework. Retrieved from https://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2019). NC Digital learning competencies for school administrators. Retrieved from https://www.dpi.nc.gov/
OCSC. (2009). Digital skills of civil and government personnel for digital government transformation. Retrieved from www.ocsc.go.th
OECD. (2018). The Future of education and skills: Education 2030. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org /education/2030-project/
Office of the Education Council. (2017). The national scheme of education B.E. 2560-2579. Bangkok: Prikwran Graphic. [in Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2021). Research report on guidelines for promoting learning linked to the national digital learning platform in Thailand. Bangkok: Prikwran Graphic. [In Thai]
ONDE. (2019). Digital competence framework for Thai citizens. Retrieved from https://www.onde.go.th/
PDST Technology in Education. (2017). Digital learning framework for primary school. Retrieved from https://www.pdsttechnologyineducation.ie/
Raksanakorn et al. (2020). Needs assessment for development of primary school administrators’ attributes in 21st century. World Journal of Education, 10(2), 158-162.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Retrieved from https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/digcompedu_en
Sheninger, E. (2014). 7 Pillars of digital leadership. International Center for Leadership in Education. Retrieved from https://leadered.com/pillars-of-digital-leadership/
Supising et al. (2021). School management paradigm in digital disruption era. Interdisciplinary Research Review, 16(2), 19-25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Educational Management and Innovation Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Idea and suggestion proposed in articles of EMI Journal belong to and stem from authors. Editor, editorial board, and EMI Journal committee are not and will not intervene authors’ standpoint. By this, the university, editor, and editorial board will not responsible for any consequence occurred by the present of author’s idea and suggestion publicized in the EMI journal.