The Studies of the ILO’s Industrial Relations Standards: A Reflection, and the Application Guidelines for Strengthening of the Industrial Relations Law Reform in Thailand, Asian and ASEAN Community Countries

Authors

  • Chokchai Suttawet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/gjl.2017.33

Keywords:

International Industrial Relations Standards; Labour Law Reform; ILO Conventions and Recommendations

Abstract

It is generally recognized that the law reform will further bring in the reformation of the relating social, economic and political activities in concern. The industrial relations arena is also affected by the change of industrial relations law affecting from the social, economic and political interactions. In the area of industrial relations, Thailand and the rest of the Asian and ASEAN countries, as the members of the International Labor Organization, are needed to find out what are the central matters of the ILO’s industrial relations standards and how to make use of them for the reform of the countries’ industrial relations law and industrial relations activities that further enrich country development. Among the ILO’s labour standards, vested in the ILO’s conventions, the industrial relations standards have been more than a half-century gradually produced and announced. The main scope of the labour standards of the industrial relations activities shaping the three stakeholders; employers, workers, and state; are especially announced through the ten conventions and recommendations;  1) Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize, 2) Collective Bargaining, Promotion and Agreement, 3) Voluntary Conciliation and Arbitration, 4) Co-operation and Consultation at the Levels of the Undertaking, Industry and National, 5) Communications within the Undertaking, 6) Workers' Representatives, 7) Examination of Grievances, 8) Tripartite Consultation,  9) Labor Administration, and 10) Labor Relations in Public Service. This article is thus aimed to grasp the central standard contents regarding industrial relations at the three tiers; firm, industry and national levels. Educating employers, employees and government officials by education institutions, workers’ and employers’ organizations and so on about these standards are therefore fundamentally important for law and industrial relations reform. In addition, the applications of the international industrial relations standards into national industrial relations law will be worthwhile affecting to the sound, peaceful and sustainable relationships among the stakeholders, and benefits not only to the employers, workers, and the state but also to the public at large.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Co-operation and consultation at the level of the undertaking,
industrial and national levels (ILO Recommendation No. 94, 1952 and No. 113, 1960)
Collective Bargaining, Promotion and Agreement
(ILO Convention No. 98, 1949, Recommendation No.
163, 1981 and No. 91, 1951)
Communications within the Undertaking Recommendation,
1967 (No. 129)
Dunlop, J. T. (1958/1993). Industrial Relations Systems (revised
edition). New York : Holt.
Examination of Grievances Recommendation, 1967 (No. 130)
Hyde, A. (1990) “A Theory of Labor Legislation”. Buffalo Law
Review, 38 (1990): 383-464.
ILO, The International Labour Standards:
Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to
Organize (ILO Convention No. 87, 1948)
Kennedy, D. (1981) “Critical labor law theory: A comment”
Berkley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, Vol. 4, Issue 3, Article 8, June 1981.
Labor Administration (ILO Convention No. 150, 1978
and Recommendation No. 158, 1978)
Labor Relations, Public Service (ILO Convention No. 151, 1978
and Recommendation No. 159, 1978)



Lee, Yong-Shik “General Theory of Law and Development”,
Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 50, No. 3,
(November 30, 2017), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2951317.
Voluntary Conciliation and Arbitration
(ILO Recommendation No. 92, 1951)
Workers' Representatives (ILO Convention No. 135, 1971
and Recommendation No. 143, 1971)
Tripartite Consultation (ILO Convention No. 144, 1976)
Suttawet, C. and Suriya Y. (2014) Labour Standards and Trade-The Case of Thailand. Published by the
International Institute for Trade and Development
(www.itd.or.th), Publish Date 13/02/2015.
Suttawet, C. (2009) The Middle Way Industrial Relations
Models for Thailand, a Research Report, granted by the Office of Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Labor, Thailand.
Weber, M. (1958). "The three types of legitimate rule". Berkeley Publications in Society and Institutions, 4 (1): 1-11. Translated
by Hans Gerth. [Appeared before in a German publication, Weber, M. (1922) Gesammelte Aufsaetze sur Wissenschaftslehre
(GAW) Tuebingen., See also in http://www.zeno.org/Soziologie/M/Weber,+Max/Schriften+zur+Wissenschaftslehre/Die+drei+reinen+Typen+der+legitimen+Herrschaft]

Downloads

Published

2018-01-21

How to Cite

Suttawet, C. (2018). The Studies of the ILO’s Industrial Relations Standards: A Reflection, and the Application Guidelines for Strengthening of the Industrial Relations Law Reform in Thailand, Asian and ASEAN Community Countries. Governance Journal, Kalasin University, 6(2), 25–60. https://doi.org/10.14456/gjl.2017.33

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย (Research Articles)