Evaluating the Outcomes of the Excellence Development Project for Thai Music at Wat Peng Pradittharam School, Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area Office 3

Main Article Content

Chawanwit Ketrat
Anu Charoenwongrayub
Phichamon Suriya-phan

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the outcomes of the Excellence Development Project for Thai Music at Wat Peng Pradittharam School, employing a causal relationship matrix framework across two levels: Long-term Outcomes and Direct Outcomes. This evaluative study focused on a target population selected through purposive sampling, consisting of 24 students, 24 parents, and 7 service recipients. The research instruments consisted of data recording forms, skills assessment forms, and questionnaires. Data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, and content analysis.


The research findings were as follows: 1) Long-term Outcomes: The project enabled students to leverage their musical skills to generate an average supplemental income of 225 THB per person. Furthermore, 66.66% of Grade 6 students successfully pursued further education through the Thai classical music excellence programs. For the school, it established a distinguished image as a conservator of Thai cultural heritage at the highest level, fostering a collaborative network of 13 agencies, organizing 14 community service activities, and securing 18 awards. Concerning parents and service recipients, they expressed the highest level of agreement concerning the project’s outcomes and operational quality. 2) Direct Outcomes: Regarding the students, it was found that all participants demonstrated proficiency in performing at least one Thai musical instrument and actively engaged in providing musical services to the community. Additionally, 45.83% of the students participated in formal competitions, reporting the highest level of agreement concerning their skill acquisition and positive attitudes. Regarding the community, the school provided Thai musical services a total of 14 times during the 2024 academic year. These findings serve as empirical evidence for enhancing project management and systematically promoting collaboration between the school and the community.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ketrat, C., Charoenwongrayub, A., & Suriya-phan, P. (2026). Evaluating the Outcomes of the Excellence Development Project for Thai Music at Wat Peng Pradittharam School, Surat Thani Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. Hatyai Academic Journal, 24(2), 236–256. retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/HatyaiAcademicJournal/article/view/285318
Section
Research Article

References

Aseltine, R. H., Jr., & DeMartino, R. (2004). An outcome evaluation of the SOS suicide prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), 446–451. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.3.446

Daorungroj, T., Ketkaew, P., Tannukul, C., & Wong-Aknit, S. (2018). An evaluation of a training project for internal education quality assessors at the curriculum level in Kasetsart University. Journal of Kasetsart Educational Review, 34(3), 171–180. [in Thai]

Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35–36.

Gotsi, M., & Wilson, A. M. (2001). Corporate reputation: Seeking a definition. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280110381189

Kanchanawasi, S. (2017). Program evaluation. Srinakharinwirot University Press. [in Thai]

Kellaghan, T., & Madaus, G. F. (2006). Outcomes of schooling: Studies in international evaluation. Springer.

Kerzner, H. (2006). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. A. (1995). Strategic marketing for educational institutions (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.

MacArthur, J. D. (1993). The logical framework: A tool for the management of project planning and evaluation (New Series Discussion Paper No. 42). Development and Project Planning Centre, University of Bradford.

Moldovan, L. (2016). Training outcome evaluation model. Procedia Technology, 22, 1184–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.166

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2023). Basic education development plan (2023–2027). https://www.bopp.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/แผนพัฒนาการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน-66-70-ของ-สพฐ.pdf [in Thai]

Prasit, P., Chaktrimongkhol, U., & Trakoonvorakun, K. (2023). An evaluation of teaching and learning of student development activities STEAM project for grade 4–6 students by using CIPP model: A case study of a demonstration school. Journal of Educational Measurement Educational and Psychological Test Bureau, 40(108), 202–212. [in Thai]

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2018). Evaluation: A systematic approach (8th ed.). Sage.

Saikaew, S. (2002). Logical framework project analysis. Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]

Srisard, B. (2005). Educational measurement and evaluation (5th ed.). Suwiriyasan. [in Thai]

Suksaen, S. (2002). Logical framework–based project writing. Uttaradit Rajabhat University. [in Thai]

Traithippayapong, T., Boonprakarn, K., & Kotcharat, J. (2021). Assessment of the outcomes of the Royal Thai Army music student program Royal Thai Army School of Music from graduates and graduate supervisors. Journal of Political Science Mahamakut Buddhist University, 1(2), 15–32. [in Thai]

Wijitsrikamon, K., Praneetwattakul, S., & Phasuk, S. (2023). Outcome and impact evaluation of large-scale research and innovation programs under TRSI of graduate studies and research development program in science and technology [Research report]. Kasetsart University. [in Thai]

Wongwiseskul, S., & Tangpharkphoom, N. (2013). Evaluation research on the project of Health Promotion Learning Center for pre-school age children and the elderly in a community. The Journal of Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Nakhonratchasima, 19(2), 31–45. [in Thai]