The Development of Coaching Model to Enhance the Creative Thinking for Undergraduate Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research was conducted to develop, test the efficiency and determine the effectiveness of the model of coaching to enhance the creative thinking. The sample group was consisted a total of the one hundred and forty-four students of “values and attributes of teachers” class. The sample group, used to for determine the effectiveness of the model of coaching with a total of thirty persons. The data was analyzed by determining percentage, mean and standard deviation. The pre-test and post-test learning outcomes were compared by a determining t-test for the dependent samples. The research findings can be summarized as follows: 1. the model of coaching to enhance the creative thinking is FEED Coaching Model consisting of two elements including 1. Coaching (First Connect, Explain, Explore and Drive Action) and 2. Creative thinking (Accept, Analyze, Ideate, Select, Implement and Evaluation) 2. According to the findings, the efficiency of the model of coaching to enhance the creative thinking was 84.77/85.37, which was higher than the standard criteria of 80/80. 3. The findings on the effectiveness of the model of coaching to enhance the creative thinking were as follows: 3.1) The student who studied with the model of coaching to enhance the creative thinking were found to be higher than the pre-test score with a statistical significance of .05 (p<.05) with post-test score. and 3.2) The student who studied with the model of coaching to enhance the creative thinking had a high level of satisfaction (X= 4.21)
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1.The articles published in the Journal of Faculty of Applied Arts are the copyright of the journal. The use of the contents, texts, opinions, pictures, tables or any parts of the articles to be published in any format for the commercial use must be officially allowed in a written form by the authorized person of the editorial team.
2.The opinion exists in each article is the author’s responsibility. The editorial team of the Journal of Faculty of Applied Arts (FAA lecturers, staff, and any personnel) will not take any responsibility on that. The author of each article is the only person who will take full responsibility for his or her own article.
References
ครูพณิชยกรรม.วารสารศิลปากรศึกษาศาสตร์วิจัย. 5(2): 134-150.
ธัญพร ชื่นกลิ่น และวัชรา เล่าเรียนดี. (2555). การพัฒนารูปแบบการโค้ชเพื่อพัฒนาสมรรถนะการจัดการเรียนรู้ของอาจารย์พยาบาลที่ส่งเสริมทักษะการคิดอย่างมีวิจารณญาณของนักศึกษาพยาบาล
ในสังกัดสถาบันพระบรมราชชนก กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. วารสารศิลปากรศึกษาศาสตร์วิจัย. 4(1): 112-129.
นิพนธ์ จิตต์ภักดี. (2553). การสอนแบบสร้างสรรค์. ประชากรศึกษา. 7(3): 19-21.
มารุต พัฒผล. (2558). รูปแบบการพัฒนาครูประถมด้านการโค้ชเพื่อการรู้คิด. Veridian E-Journal. 8(2): 593-612.
สุวิมล ติรกานันท์. (2557). ระเบียบวิธีการวิจัยทางสังคมศาสตร์. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย
สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560-2579. กรุงเพทมหานคร: พริกหวานกราฟฟิค
Bennie, Andrew.; & O’Connor, Donna. (2011). An Effective Coaching Model: The Perception and strategies of professional team sport coach and players in Australia.
International Journal of Sport and Health Science. 9(2): 98-104.
Divito, Altred. (1971). Recognized Assessing Creativity Developing Teacher Competencies. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice-Hall Inc.
Hodge, Alison. (2016). The value of coaching supervision as a development process: Contribution to continued professional and personal wellbeing for executive
Coaches. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring. 12(2): 87-106.
Linder-Pelz, S. (2014). Steps towards the benchmarking of coaches' skills. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring. 12(1): 47-62
McComb, C. (2013). Managing the Internal Labour Market in a Manufacturing Company: Explaining
Coaching’s Perceived Ineffectiveness. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring. 11(1): 1-20.
Osborn, M. (1996). “Social class, educational opportunity and equal entitlement: dilemmas of schooling in England and France,” paper presented at the America
Education Research Association Annual Conference, New York.
Rossmann, M. G. (1996). “Viral cell recognition and entry.” Curr. Sci, 71 : 193-204.